We are doing hourly data import to our index, per day one or two requests
are getting failed with the message "A command is still running...".
1. Does it mean, the data import not happened for the last hour?
2. If you look at the "Full Dump Started" time has an older data, in the
below log all mos
Hello All,
I want to size the RAM for my Solr cloud instance. The thumb rule is your
total RAM size should be = (JVM size + index size)
Now I have a simple question, How do I know my index size? A simple method,
perhaps from the Solr cloud admin UI or an API?
My assumption so far is the total se
Hi Mikhail,
Here is the code, where basically we are trying to retrieve the value of facet
counts, that sometimes returned as Integer and sometime as Long,
where we've got the ClassCast exception, until the W/A of Numeric casting was
applied.
if (resList != null) {
List terms = n
Hello,
I'm trying to upgrade to solr 8.4.1 and facing below error while start up and
my cores are not being listed in solr admin screen. I need your help.
2020-02-03 12:12:35.622 ERROR (coreContainerWorkExecutor-2-thread-1) [ ]
o.a.s.c.CoreContainer Error waiting for SolrCore to be loaded on
I’ve always had trouble with that advice, that RAM size should be JVM + index
size. I’ve seen 300G indexes (as measured by the size of the data/index
directory) run in 128G of memory.
Here’s the long form:
https://lucidworks.com/post/sizing-hardware-in-the-abstract-why-we-dont-have-a-definitiv
Hi Shawn/Erick,
This information has been very helpful. Thank you.
So I did some more investigation into our ETL process and I verified that
with the exception of the text I sent above they are all obviously invalid
dates. For example, one field value had 00 for a day so would guess that
field ha
I don’t quite know how TolerantUpdateProcessor works with importing CSV
files, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445. That is about
sending batches of docs to Solr and frankly I don’t know what path your
process will take. It’s worth a try though.
Otherwise, I typically go with SolrJ
Hello,
Looking to see how others accomplished this goal. We have a 3 Tier
architecture, Solr is down deep in T3 far from the end user. How do you make
Auto-Suggest calls from the Internet Browser through the Tiers down to Solr in
T3? We essentially created steps down each tier, but I'm
HI Mikhail/ All
Do we have any alternative of ChildDocTransformerFactory i.e. fl=id,[child
parentFilter=doc_type:book childFilter=doc_type:chapter limit=100]
I am facing high performance impact because of this . Any suggestions?
Thanks
Regards
Kumar Gaurav
What he said.
But if you must have a number, assume that the index will be as big as your
(text) data. It might be 2X bigger or 2X smaller. Or 3X or 4X, but that is a
starting point. Once you start updating, the index might get as much as 2X
bigger before merges.
Do NOT try to get by with the
Yup, I find the right calculation to be as much ram as the server can take,
and as much SSD space as it will hold, when you run out, buy another server
and repeat. machines/ram/SSD's are cheap. just get as much as you can.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 11:59 AM Walter Underwood
wrote:
> What he said.
This is a bit of a guess - I haven't used this functionality before.
But to a novice the "tag" Rule Condition for "Rule Based Replica
Placement" sounds similar to the requirements you mentioned above.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_3/rule-based-replica-placement.html#rule-conditions
Good
We are using Solr's kerberos authentication plugin and we are trying to
implement field-level filtering based on the authenticated user and
DocTransformer class:
public class FieldAclTransformerFactory extends TransformerFactory {
@Override
public DocTransformer create(String field
We are using Solr's kerberos authentication plugin and we are trying to
implement field-level filtering based on the authenticated user and
DocTransformer class:
public class FieldAclTransformerFactory extends TransformerFactory {
@Override
public DocTransformer create(String field
Any thoughts on this?. We are continuously publishing and have disabled
schemaless mode.
Thanks,
Rajeswari
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:18 AM Rajeswari Natarajan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Getting below exception. We have solrcloud 7.6 installed and have
> commented off the below in solrconfig.xml
>
>
>
>
Hello,
I am working with Solr 7.2.1 and had a question regarding the performance
of wildcard searches.
q=*:*
vs
q=id:*
vs
q=id:[* TO *]
Can someone please rank them in the order of performance with the
underlying reason?
Thanks,
Rahul
On 2/3/2020 5:16 AM, Srinivas Kashyap wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade to solr 8.4.1 and facing below error while start up and
my cores are not being listed in solr admin screen. I need your help.
Caused by: java.nio.channels.OverlappingFileLockException
at sun.nio.ch.SharedFil
On 2/3/2020 12:06 PM, Rahul Goswami wrote:
I am working with Solr 7.2.1 and had a question regarding the performance
of wildcard searches.
q=*:*
vs
q=id:*
vs
q=id:[* TO *]
Can someone please rank them in the order of performance with the
underlying reason?
The only one of those that is an act
Hey all,
When our searcher refreshes on a soft-commit, we get a slight latency spike
(p99th response times can jump up to about 200ms from 100ms), however what we
see in the upstream clients using org.apache.solr.client.solrj SolrClient is a
big spike in connections outbound (70-80 per client, f
Hi All ,
Solr 8.2
Database structure .
Parent -> Children
Each child has parent referenceId
Query: Get Parent doc based on child query
Method 1: {!graph from=parentId to=parentId
traversalFilter='docType:parent' returnRoot=false}child.name:foo AND
child.type:name
Result : 1
Debug:
"rawquerystr
Hello,
Is there a way to block certain queries in solr? For eg a delete for *:* or
if there is a known query that causes problems, can these be blocked at the
solr server layer.
Hi,
Could anyone let me know if a real time get would return a cached, up to date
version of a document if we enabled documentCache?
Thanks
Karl
This e-mail is sent on behalf of Auto Trader Group Plc, Registered Office: 1
Tony Wilson Place, Manchester, Lancashire, M15 4FN (Registered in England
The documentCache shouldn’t matter at all. RTG should return the latest doc by
maintaining a pointer into the tlogs and returning that version.
> On Feb 3, 2020, at 6:43 PM, Karl Stoney
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Could anyone let me know if a real time get would return a cached, up to date
> version
Hi,
I want to use the Solr query elevation component. Let's say I want to
elevate "doc_id" when a user inputs the query "qwerty". I am able to get a
prototype to work by filling these values in elevate.xml and hitting the
Solr API with q="qwerty".
However, in our service, where I want to plug thi
What should we expect the query performance impacted by splitting one
collection into more shards?
We expect the query performance would degrade by splitting more shards since
the overhead of merging results from several shards.
However, the test result seems not as we expect. Any idea or exper
Hi Shawn,
I did delete the data folder of the core and also did in windows command: solr
stop -all. I see only one solr server is running in this machine which gets
started and stopped when I do so. To confirm, I even copied my folders to
another system and tried there but facing same issue.
I
On 2/3/2020 5:17 PM, ChienHua wrote:
What should we expect the query performance impacted by splitting one
collection into more shards?
We expect the query performance would degrade by splitting more shards since
the overhead of merging results from several shards.
However, the test result seem
Sorry for the interruption, This error was due to wrong context path mentioned
in solr-jetty-context.xml
And in jetty.xml it was referring /solr. So index was locked.
Thanks,
Srinivas
-Original Message-
From: Srinivas Kashyap
Sent: 04 February 2020 11:04
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.
Great stuff thank you Erick
On 04/02/2020, 00:17, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
The documentCache shouldn’t matter at all. RTG should return the latest doc
by maintaining a pointer into the tlogs and returning that version.
> On Feb 3, 2020, at 6:43 PM, Karl Stoney
wrote:
>
> Hi,
29 matches
Mail list logo
