Are you querying across multiple collections? In that case you have to add the
field to all those collections. You have not shown us your facet query.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 11. okt. 2019 kl. 22:37 skrev Joe Obernberger :
>
> Hi All, I've ad
Hi,
Did you find a solution to your performance problem?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 17. jun. 2019 kl. 17:17 skrev Andy Reek :
>
> Hi Solr team,
>
> we are using Solr in version 7.1 as search engine in our online shop (SAP
> Hybris). And as a t
> On 18 Oct 2019, at 00:25, Drew Kidder wrote:
> * I'm using the following command line to start a basic solr cloud instance
> as per the documentation: `bin/solr start -c -z zk1:2181,zk2:2181,zk3:2181`
I assume you’re just looking to run a single Solr node in a single container,
right?
Just
Hi,
There are two solutions as far as I know.
1. Use userDictionary attribute
This is common and safe way I think.
Add userDictionary attribute into your tokenizer configuration and define
userDictionary file as follows.
Tokenizer:
userDictionary(lang/userdict_ja.txt in above setting):
日本人,日本
I really don’t understand the question. The field has to be multiValued, but
there’s no other restriction. It’s all about whether a document you input has
the same field name specified more than once, i.e. is multiValued. That’s why
the example I gave has
sentence one
sentence two
sentenc
Hi Shubham,
In other words, *you specify a large positionIncrementGap to make sure that
your queries don't match across multiple values of a field*.
For example, for a query like title:"paper plate making machine", you don't
want it to match with doc having two values for title:"paper plate",
"ma
Hi Andy,
Have you run performance benchmarking for sometime and made sure that the
Solr Caching and GC doesn't impact the performance? I recommend that you
should rebuild the performance matrix after few warmups and requests. Have
you invalidated this?
On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 at 12:35, Jan Høydahl w
Solr Users,
Any suggestion or insights on the Solr behavior will help.
Regards
Ganesh
-Original Message-
From: Sethuraman, Ganesh
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 9:25 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr JVM Turning - 7.2.1
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of
Thank you all for your suggestions! I appreciate the fast turnaround.
My setup is using Amazon ECS for our solr cloud installation. Each ZK is in
its own container, using Route53 Service Discovery to provide the DNS name.
The ZK nodes can all talk to each other, and I can communicate to each one
o
On 10/18/2019 9:28 AM, Drew Kidder wrote:
I'm beginning to think that ZK is not setup correctly. I haven't uploaded
any configuration files to ZK yet; my understanding was that I could start
up a solr cloud node with no collections and upload the configuration from
there. I was under the impressi
Even if you do not have a dedicated zkRoot node you will need to provide / in
the connection.
Then, even if the zk nodes can connect with each other it does not mean they
form an ensemble. You need to adapt zoo.cfg of all nodes and add all nodes to
it. Additionally all will need a myid file wit
Hey all,
I am new to this group. I am working with a vendor to get Solr up and running
with AEM 6.4. Has anyone had any experience with this? I am wanting to use Solr
8.1, but I cannot find documentation that says they are compatible. Does anyone
know for sure?
Thanks in advance.
- Natalie
-
This could be because Zookeeper ensemble is not properly configured. Using
a very similar setup which consists of ZK cluster of three hosts and one
Solr Cloud node (all are containers), the system got running. Each ZK host
has ZOO_MY_ID and ZOO_SERVERS environment variables set before running ZK.
I
On 10/18/2019 11:10 AM, Natalie Hannigan wrote:
I am new to this group. I am working with a vendor to get Solr up and running
with AEM 6.4. Has anyone had any experience with this? I am wanting to use Solr
8.1, but I cannot find documentation that says they are compatible. Does anyone
know for
Hi Joel,
Do you see anything wrong in the config or data . I am using 7.6.
Thanks,
Rajeswari
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 8:36 AM Rajeswari Natarajan
wrote:
> My config is from
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/tree/branch_7_6/solr/solrj/src/test-files/solrj/solr/configsets/streaming/conf
Again, thank you all for the suggestions.
My ZK ensemble is talking to each other and the outside world:
solr@fe0ad5b40b42:/etc/default# echo srvr | nc zk1.zookeeper.internal 2181
Zookeeper version: 3.5.5-390fe37ea45dee01bf87dc1c042b5e3dcce88653, built on
05/03/2019 12:07 GMT
Latency min/avg/max:
The query that is created to me looks looked good but it returns no
results. Let's just do a basic query using the select handler:
product_s:product1
If this brings back zero results then we know we have a problem with the
data.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019
I believe we were debugging why graph results were not being returned in a
different thread. It looks like the same problem.
Is your Solr instance a straight install or have you moved config files
from an older version of Solr to a newer version of Solr.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.co
As an additional bit of information, here's the tcpdump of my startup of
solr in the docker container, after logging into the container and running
"bin/solr start -f -c" (which is the same CMD my Dockerfile executes):
root@91e3883fb675:/opt/solr-8.2.0# tcpdump -nvvv -i any -c 100 host
172.20.60.1
19 matches
Mail list logo
