Comparing memory consumption (real, not virtual) of quiesent Solr
v8.0 and prior with Solr v8.1.0 reveals the older versions use about
1.6GB on my systems but v8.1.0 uses 4.5 to 5+GB. Systems used are SUSE
Linux, with Oracle JDK v1.8 and openjdk v10. This is a major memory
consumption issue
On 5/25/2019 9:40 AM, Joe Doupnik wrote:
Comparing memory consumption (real, not virtual) of quiesent Solr
v8.0 and prior with Solr v8.1.0 reveals the older versions use about
1.6GB on my systems but v8.1.0 uses 4.5 to 5+GB. Systems used are SUSE
Linux, with Oracle JDK v1.8 and openjdk v10
On 26/05/2019 19:08, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 5/25/2019 9:40 AM, Joe Doupnik wrote:
Comparing memory consumption (real, not virtual) of quiesent
Solr v8.0 and prior with Solr v8.1.0 reveals the older versions use
about 1.6GB on my systems but v8.1.0 uses 4.5 to 5+GB. Systems used
are SUSE L
Different garbage collector configuration? It does not mean that Solr uses more
memory if it is occupied - it could also mean that the JVM just kept it
reserved for future memory needs.
> Am 25.05.2019 um 17:40 schrieb Joe Doupnik :
>
> Comparing memory consumption (real, not virtual) of q
On 26/05/2019 19:15, Joe Doupnik wrote:
On 26/05/2019 19:08, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 5/25/2019 9:40 AM, Joe Doupnik wrote:
Comparing memory consumption (real, not virtual) of quiesent
Solr v8.0 and prior with Solr v8.1.0 reveals the older versions use
about 1.6GB on my systems but v8.1.0 u
I think this is also a very risky memory strategy. What happens if you Index
and query at the same time etc. maybe it is more worth to provide as much
memory as for concurrent operations are needed. This includes JVM memory but
also the disk caches.
> Am 26.05.2019 um 20:38 schrieb Joe Doupnik
On 26/05/2019 19:38, Jörn Franke wrote:
Different garbage collector configuration? It does not mean that Solr uses more
memory if it is occupied - it could also mean that the JVM just kept it
reserved for future memory needs.
Am 25.05.2019 um 17:40 schrieb Joe Doupnik :
Comparing memory
I do queries while indexing, have done so for a long time, without
difficulty nor memory usage spikes from dual use. The system has been
designed to support that.
Again, one may look at the numbers using "top" or similar. Try Solr
v8.0 and 8.1 to see the difference which I experience her
On 5/26/2019 12:52 PM, Joe Doupnik wrote:
I do queries while indexing, have done so for a long time, without
difficulty nor memory usage spikes from dual use. The system has been
designed to support that.
Again, one may look at the numbers using "top" or similar. Try Solr
v8.0 and 8.1
I'm not sure this issue applies in this situation but it's worth taking a
look at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12833?focusedCommentId=16807868&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16807868
Although the memory issue in the ticket involves d
10 matches
Mail list logo