Thanks guys.
*Don't mean to be a bother*, just want to confirm, I know it's doable to
search keywords, but what I want is * FileName(s) * that contains the
string. The answer is still a yes?
Thanks again.
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:20 PM Jörn Franke wrote:
> You can go much more than grep.
yes in that case your file name should be key field of each document you
added to the solr
On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 12:32, luckydog xf wrote:
> Thanks guys.
>
> *Don't mean to be a bother*, just want to confirm, I know it's doable to
> search keywords, but what I want is * FileName(s) * that co
In that case you'll have to duplicate that field:
id: $name_of_file
id_t: $name_of_file
The first field should be marked as "string", and set to be the key field.
Id-fields cannot be tokenized.
The second field is a derivative (you can just copy the contents, or use
copyField),
and should be se
Thank you all. Learn a lot from you guys.
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:54 PM Nicolas Franck
wrote:
> In that case you'll have to duplicate that field:
>
> id: $name_of_file
> id_t: $name_of_file
>
> The first field should be marked as "string", and set to be the key field.
> Id-fields cannot be tok
I didn't see any response so I wanted to check if my observation simply is not
relevant for other people or if I missed to provide any required details.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
Date: 05/09/2019 08:28 AM
Subject: Negative boost query (bq) with edismax for lower scores with Solr 8
I f
Hi,
I have enabled HTTPS on my SOLR server and it works fine over HTTPS for
interaction with SOLR via the browser such as for data queries and
management actions.
However, I now get an error when attempting to retrieve data from the SQL
server for Indexing. The JDBC connection string has the para
On 5/23/2019 5:45 AM, Paul wrote:
unable to find
valid certification path to requested target
This seems to be the root of your problem with the connection to SQL server.
If I have all the context right, Java is saying it can't validate the
certificate returned by the SQL server.
This page:
Thanks Erick,
Pretty stuck with the delete-by-query as it can be deleting a million docs.
I'll work through what you have said and also try to find the root cause of the
recovery.
Regards
Russell Taylor
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent:
We don’t see your attachments, the mail server pretty aggressively strips them.
You’ll have to put them somewhere shareable and post a link.
What exactly are you trying? SolrCloud? Stand-alone? What commands do you run
when you start Solr?
You might review:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMai
Thanks for the reply Shawn.
What I was asking is whether there is an option to exclude the comms to SQL
from SOLR managed encryption as the JDBC driver manages the connection and
SOLR is acting as the Client in this instance and is already using encrypted
comms via the connection string parameters
On 5/23/2019 9:56 AM, Paul wrote:
Thanks for the reply Shawn.
What I was asking is whether there is an option to exclude the comms to SQL
from SOLR managed encryption as the JDBC driver manages the connection and
SOLR is acting as the Client in this instance and is already using encrypted
comms
Please see if the zookeeper is installed before installing solrcloud , in case
you are not running embedded Zookeeper.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Rajeswari
From: Karthic Viswanathan
Reply-To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2019 at 10:37 PM
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org
And this is only a solutions for testing. For production you need to import the
certificate chain into your truststore
> Am 23.05.2019 um 18:06 schrieb Shawn Heisey :
>
>> On 5/23/2019 9:56 AM, Paul wrote:
>> Thanks for the reply Shawn.
>> What I was asking is whether there is an option to excl
Reindexing to alias is not always easy if it requires 2x resources. Just to
be clear the issues you mentioned are mostly around faceting because we
haven't seen any other search/retrieval issues. Or is that not accurate?
On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 5:12 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> 1> I strongly recom
You’ll have subtle, or not so subtle problems. String types are a single token,
so a document with “my dog has fleas” will not be returned when searching for
any of those 4 words. My definition there’s no position information in stored
with the string type, so no phrases will work against docs i
15 matches
Mail list logo
