Hi,
The second query is equivalent to:
> {
> "query": "*:*",
> "limit": 0,
> "filter": [
>"{!parent which=kind_s:edition}condition_s:0",
>"price_i:[* TO 75]"
> ]
> }
HTH,
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Tra
Hi All,
I am new in implementing solr LTR . so facing few challenges
Broadly we have 3 kind of features
a) Based on query
b) based on document
*c) Based on query-document from click ,cart and order from tracker data.*
So my question here is how to store c) type of features
- Old querie
Emir, no
пт, 26 окт. 2018 г. в 10:17, Emir Arnautović :
> Hi,
> The second query is equivalent to:
> > {
> > "query": "*:*",
> > "limit": 0,
> > "filter": [
> >"{!parent which=kind_s:edition}condition_s:0",
> >"price_i:[* TO 75]"
> > ]
> > }
>
>
> HTH,
> Emir
> --
> Monitoring - L
Hi Tim,
It is msg files and I added tika-app-1.14.jar to the build path - and now it
works 😊 But how do I get it to read the attachments as well?
-Original Message-
From: Tim Allison
Sent: 25. oktober 2018 21:57
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reading data using Tika to Sol
Hi,
Just to confirm, are you asking about the following?
For a particular query, you have a list of documents, and for each
document, you have data
on the number of times the document was clicked on, added to a cart, and
ordered, and you
would like to use this data for features. Is this correct?
*Thanks for relpy . Please find my answers below inline.*
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 2:41 PM Kamuela Lau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to confirm, are you asking about the following?
>
> For a particular query, you have a list of documents, and for each
> document, you have data
> on the number of times t
Hi again,
Never mind, I got manage to get the content of the msg-files as well using the
following link as inspiration: https://wiki.apache.org/tika/RecursiveMetadata
But thanks again for all your help!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ)
Sent: 26. oktober 2018 10:14
To:
IIRC, somewhere btwn 1.14 and now (1.19.1), we changed the default behavior
for the AutoDetectParser from skip attachments to include attachments.
So, two options: 1) upgrade to 1.19.1 and use the AutoDetectParser or 2)
pass an AutoDetectParser via the ParseContext to be used for attachments.
If
Ha...emails passed in the ether.
As you saw, we added the RecursiveParserWrapper a while back into Tika so
no need to re-invent that wheel. That’s my preferred method/format because
it maintains metadata from attachments and lets you know about exceptions
in embedded files. The legacy method conc
Hi Tim,
Thanks again, I will update Tika and try it again.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Allison
Sent: 26. oktober 2018 12:53
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reading data using Tika to Solr
Ha...emails passed in the ether.
As you saw, we added the RecursiveParserWrapper a w
This two queries are not similar. If you have parent with two children -
"{condition_s:0, price_i: 100}" and "{condition_s:1, price_i: 10}", it
will be matched by first query, it won't be matched by second.
26.10.2018, 09:50, "Владислав Властовский" :
> Hi, I use 7.5.0 Solr
>
> Why
Andrey, ok
How can I tag the filter then?
I send:
{
"query": "*:*",
"limit": 1000,
"filter": [
"{!parent which=kind_s:edition}condition_s:0 AND {!tag=price}price_i:[*
TO 75]"
]
}
I got:
{
"error": {
"metadata": [
"error-class",
"org.apache.solr.common.SolrExcept
Hi,
I would like to have more understanding of the lifecycle for IndexSearcher in
Solr, I understand that IndexSearcher for Lucene would recommended that “For
performance reasons, if your index is unchanging, you should share a single
IndexSearcher instance across multiple searches instead of c
Hi again,
Now I moved the OCR part to Tika, but I still can't make it work with Danish.
It works when using default language settings and it seems like Tika is missing
Danish dictionary.
My java code looks like this:
{
File file = new File(pathfilename);
Metadata meta
There supposed to be support of children "filters" attribute in latest
releases. Try it out.
Link
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/other-parsers.html#filtering-and-tagging-2
26.10.2018, 16:34, "Владислав Властовский" :
> Andrey, ok
>
> How can I tag the filter then?
>
> I send:
> {
>
Followup:
I had a theory that Nicky tested, and I think what was observed confirms the
theory.
TL;DR:
In previous versions, I think there was a bug where the presence of boolean
operators caused edismax to ignore the mm parameter, and only rely on the
boolean operator(s).
After that bug got
Hi everyone,
We have a SolrCloud setup with the following configuration:
* 4 nodes (3x128GB RAM Intel Xeon E5-1650v2, 1x64GB RAM Intel Xeon
E5-1650v2, 12 cores, with SSDs)
* One collection, 4 shards, each has only a single replica (so 4
replicas in total), using compositeId router
* Tot
Some ideas:
1> What version of Solr? Solr 7.3 completely re-wrote Leader Initiated
Recovery and 7.5 has other improvements for recovery, we're hoping
that the recovery situation is much improved.
2> In the 7x code line, there are TLOG and PULL replicas. As of 7.5,
you can set up so the queries ar
Thanks Erick,
1. We already use Solr 7.5, upgraded some of our nodes only recently to
see if this eliminates the difference in performance (it doesn't, but
I'll test and see if the situation with replicas syncing/recovery has
improved since then)
2. Yes, we only open searcher once every 30 m
Andrey, thx. You are an expert!
пт, 26 окт. 2018 г. в 18:40, Kydryavtsev Andrey :
> There supposed to be support of children "filters" attribute in latest
> releases. Try it out.
>
> Link
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_3/other-parsers.html#filtering-and-tagging-2
>
> 26.10.2018, 16:34,
The G1 collector should improve 95th percentile performance, because it limits
the length of pauses.
With the CMS/ParNew collector, I ran very large Eden spaces, 2 Gb out of an 8
Gb heap. Nearly all of the allocations in Solr have the lifetime of one
request, so you don’t want any of those allo
Tika relies on you to install tesseract and all the language libraries
you'll need.
If you can successfully call `tesseract testing/eurotext.png
testing/eurotext-dan -l dan`, Tika _should_ be able to specify "dan"
with your code above.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:49 AM Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ) wr
Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
> 5. Yes, docValues are enabled for the fields we sort on
> (except score which is an internal field); [...]
I am currently working on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8374
which speeds up DocValues-operations for indexes with many documents.
What "many" means
Would adding the docValues in the schema, but not reindexing, cause
errors? IE, only apply the doc values after the next reindex, but in the
meantime keep functioning as there were none until then?
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 2:15 PM Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
> > 5. Yes, docVa
David Hastings wrote:
> Would adding the docValues in the schema, but not reindexing, cause
> errors? IE, only apply the doc values after the next reindex, but in the
> meantime keep functioning as there were none until then?
As soon as you specify in the schema that a field has docValues=true,
Hi Tim,
You were right.
When I called `tesseract testing/eurotext.png testing/eurotext-dan -l dan`, I
got an error message so I downloaded "dan.traineddata" and added it to the
Tesseract-OCR/tessdata folder. Furthermore I added the 'TESSDATA_PREFIX'
variable to the path-variables pointing to "
Hi Martin,
Are you using it For image formats , I think you can try tess4j and use
give TESSDATA_PREFIX as the home for tessarct Configs.
I have tried it and it works pretty well in my local machine.
I have used java 8 and tesseact 3 for the same.
Regards,
Rohan Kasat
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 1
I have never done such a thing myself, but I think that dynamic field would
probably be the way to go.
I've not used it myself, but you might also be able to do what you want
with payloads:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_5/function-queries.html#payload-function
https://lucidworks.com/201
Sofiya:
I haven't said so before, but it's a great pleasure to work with
someone who's done a lot of homework before pinging the list. The only
unfortunate bit is that it usually means the simple "Oh, I can fix
that without thinking about it much" doesn't work ;)
2. I'll clarify a bit here. Any
Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
> Target query rate is up to 500 qps, maybe 300, and we need
> to keep response time at <200ms. But at the moment we only
> see very good search performance with up to 100 requests
> per second. Whenever it grows to about 200, average response
> time abruptly increases to 0.
On 10/26/2018 9:55 AM, Sofiya Strochyk wrote:
We have a SolrCloud setup with the following configuration:
I'm late to this party. You've gotten some good replies already. I
hope I can add something useful.
* 4 nodes (3x128GB RAM Intel Xeon E5-1650v2, 1x64GB RAM Intel Xeon
E5-1650v
31 matches
Mail list logo
