Hello All,
I am trying to remove the double quotes from a field and that's why written
PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory, but it doesn't seem to be working.
I also tried to replace it on querying time, but the SOLR throwing error that
entity must be closed with >
select replace(t.name, '\"', '
Nope. In this case, it will respond terminatedEarly=false even if noone
request it.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:09 AM zhenyuan wei wrote:
> Yeah，got it~. So the QueryResult.segmentTerminatedEarly maybe a boolean,
> instead of Boolean, is better， right?
>
> Mikhail Khludnev 于2018年9月3日周一 下午1:36写道：
SG refers to Singaporeand the time is UTC +8.
That means I need to set the P_TradeShowOnlineEndDate date to UTC
instead of UTC +8 as a workaround to it.
On 31/8/2018 10:16 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 8/30/2018 7:26 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
Can the timezone of the NOW parameter in the |deleteByQuer
I mean, use terminatedEarly as basic boolean type, then no need to explicitly
assign it as Boolean.FALSE, because basic boolean's default value is false.
Mikhail Khludnev 于2018年9月3日周一 下午4:13写道：
> Nope. In this case, it will respond terminatedEarly=false even if noone
> request it.
>
> On Mon,
Hi, really nope :) Because as MK writes below, result.segmentTerminatedEarly is
used as a 3-state variable.
The only line that could be improved, is probably replacing "Boolean.FALSE" by
simply "false", but that is really a minor thing...
Regards
PB
Oh ~ I feel embarrassed to explaining it again, maybe my english not so
well~
my actually mean is: IF QueryResult.segmentTerminatedEarly is boolean
,not Boolean , declared in QueryResult.
public class QueryResult{
private boolean partialResults
* private Boolean segmentTerminatedE
On 31/08/2018 19:36, Doug Turnbull wrote:
Hello,
We're working on a Solr More Like This project (Solr 6.6.2), using the More
Like This searchComponent. What we note is in standalone Solr, when we
request MLT using the search component, we get every more like this
document fully formed with compl
On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 09:37 +0200, Bernd Fehling wrote:
> Yes, I tested many cases.
Erick is absolutely right about the challenge of finding "best" setups.
What we can do is gather observations, as you have done, and hope that
people with similar use cases finds them. With that in mind, have you
c
Hi,
we'd like to store the PID file for the Solr service in a directory
below the /run directory (CentOS 7.5).
I've set "SOLR_PID_DIR=/run/solr" in solr.in.sh. But if /run is mounted
as tmpfs, the directory /run/solr will not exist after boot and the pid
file cannot be stored in that directo
Hi
We have requirement to boost only first few records & rest of result should
be as per search.
e.g. if i have books of different genre & if user search for some book
(intrested in genere : comedy) then
we want to show say first 3 records of genre:comedy and rest of results
should be of diff gen
Yes thats right, there is no "best" setup at all, only one that
gives most advantage to your requirements.
And any setup has some disadvantages.
Currently I'm short in time and have to bring our Cloud to production
but a write-up is in the queue as already done with other developments.
https://ww
Hi,
The requirement is not 100% clear or logical. If user selects filter
type:comedy, it does not make sense to show anything else. You might have
“Other categories relavant results” and that can be done as a separate query.
It seems that you want to prefer comedy, but you have an issue with boo
I agree , the tow query solution is the simplest to implement and you have much
more control on the UI as well. It seems you want to have a “featured” set of
results above and separate from the organic results from the index.
You could choose to request only specific fields in the “featured” que
Sorry for not giving up on this issue:
is this "behavior" a feature or a bug?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Clemens Wyss DEV
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. August 2018 18:01
An: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Betreff: Solr suggestions: why are exact matches omitted
Given the following confi
Hello,
I hardly follow, but subj sounds like reranking.
http://people.apache.org/~mkhl/searchable-solr-guide-7-3/query-re-ranking.html#query-re-ranking
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:02 PM mama wrote:
> Hi
> We have requirement to boost only first few records & rest of result should
> be as per sear
I'm afraid only thorough debugging might answer.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:58 PM Clemens Wyss DEV
wrote:
> Sorry for not giving up on this issue:
> is this "behavior" a feature or a bug?
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Clemens Wyss DEV
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. August 2018 18:01
>
Hi ，
I am curious “How long does a query q=field1:2312 cost , which
exactly match only one document? ”， Of course we just discuss no
queryResultCache with match in this situation.
In fact my QTime is 150ms+， it is too long.
> I'm afraid only thorough debugging might answer
I'd say debugging is only required if everybody (not just me 😉) expects to get
"the exact match" in the spellcheck-response ... If it's nonsense to expect
"the exact match" in the spellcheck-respons, then it's a feature of
spellchecking
-Ur
Add debug=true and see where the time goes, in which components?
Highlighting is my culprit guess. Or faceting?
> On Sep 3, 2018, at 07:45, zhenyuan wei wrote:
>
> Hi ，
> I am curious “How long does a query q=field1:2312 cost , which
> exactly match only one document? ”， Of course we j
Hi
thanks for posting this, was getting same error and had same stored false
ID.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi
We have a timeseries expression with gap="+1DAY" and a sum(imps_l) to aggregate
sums of an integer for each bucket.
Now, some day buckets do not contain any documents at all, and instead of
returning a tuple with value 0, it returns
a tuple with no entry at all for the sum, see the bucket for
Only a termQuery q=field1:2312, No other conditions.
I try debug now, but can not find out what is the main cost.
Debug=timing output like :
{
"responseHeader":{
"zkConnected":true,
"status":0,
"QTime":157,
"params":{
"q":"v00_s:15de21c670ae7c3f6f3f1f37029303c9",
"de
Only a termQuery q=field1:2312, No other conditions.
I try debug now, but can not find out what is the main cost.
Debug=timing output like :
{
"responseHeader":{
"zkConnected":true,
"status":0,
"QTime":157,
"params":{
"q":"v00_s:15de21c670ae7c3f6f3f1f37029303c9",
"de
On 9/3/2018 1:51 AM, Gopesh Sharma wrote:
I am trying to remove the double quotes from a field and that's why written
PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory, but it doesn't seem to be working.
When you say it's not working, how precisely are you checking? If
you're looking at the field value in sea
Thanks Charlie, those are helpful.
I think at this point we will attach a debugger and see what shakes out.
Perhaps it's one of these cases you list. Perhaps we're missing something.
We'll report back.
-Doug
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:23 AM Charlie Hull wrote:
> On 31/08/2018 19:36, Doug Turnbul
I need to create a contextual Synonym Filter:
I need that the Synonym Filter load different synonym configuration based on
the fq query parameter.
I've already modified the SynonymGraphFilterFactory to load from DB (this is
another requirement) but I can't understand how to make the fq paramete
Hi Luca,
I believe this is not an easy task to do passing through Solr/Lucene
internals; did you try to use what Solr offers out of the box?
For example, you could define several fields associated where each
corresponding field type uses a different synonym set. So you would have
* F1 -> FT1
Hi,
I am in the process of setting up Solr LTR in Solr 7.4.0. Understand that
there are different types of model like Linear Model, Multiple Additive
Trees Model and Neural Network Model.
Any one has information on which model is the most suitable to be use for
the best performance for dealing wi
My guess is that you're searching un-warmed instances of Solr and are
seeing the time it takes to read the index structures into memory the
first time. What happens if you turn off indexing and query a number
of values (not the same one or you'll hit the queryResultCache).
So your first query woul
Hello,
we recently upgraded our solrcloud (5 nodes, 25 collections, 1 shard each, 4
replicas each) from 6.6.0 to 7.3.0 and shortly after to 7.4.0. We are running
Zookeeper 4.1.13.
Since the upgrade to 7.3.0 and also 7.4.0 we encountering heap space
exhaustion. After obtaining a heap dump it lo
I would expect at least 1 IndexSearcher per replica, how many total
replicas hosted in your JVM?
Plus, if you're actively indexing, there may temporarily be 2
IndexSearchers open while the new searcher warms.
And there may be quite a few caches, at least queryResultCache and
filterCache and docum
Hi Erick,
thank you for your answer.
Unfortunately I do not have a heap dump from 6.6.
> On 3. Sep 2018, at 20:48, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> I would expect at least 1 IndexSearcher per replica, how many total
> replicas hosted in your JVM?
27 replicas per JVM.
>
> Plus, if you're actively
Hello,
Getting an OOM plus the fact you are having a lot of IndexSearcher instances
rings a familiar bell. One of our collections has the same issue [1] when we
attempted an upgrade 7.2.1 > 7.3.0. I managed to rule out all our custom Solr
code but had to keep our Lucene filters in the schema, t
Reducing to 10 won't be definitive, but if the problem gets better
it'll be a clue.
How are you committing? Is it just based on the solrconfig settings or
do you have any clients submitting commit commands?
One fat clue would be if, in your solr logs, you were getting any
warnings about "too many
Hi Markus,
this reads exactly like what we have. Where you able to figure out anything?
Currently thinking about rollbacking to 7.2.1.
> On 3. Sep 2018, at 21:54, Markus Jelsma wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Getting an OOM plus the fact you are having a lot of IndexSearcher instances
> rings a fam
Hi,
> On 3. Sep 2018, at 22:18, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> Reducing to 10 won't be definitive, but if the problem gets better
> it'll be a clue.
>
> How are you committing? Is it just based on the solrconfig settings or
> do you have any clients submitting commit commands?
Only through the aut
Hello Björn,
Take great care, 7.2.1 cannot read an index written by 7.4.0, so you cannot
roll back but need to reindex!
Andrey Kudryavtsev made a good suggestion in the thread on how to find the
culprit, but it will be a tedious task. I have not yet had the time or courage
to venture there.
Thanks, Shawn. That helps with the meaning of the "solr" format.
Our needs are pretty basic. We have some upstream processes that crawl
the data and generate a JSON feed that works with the default post
command. So far this works well and keeps things simple.
Thanks!
...scott
On 9/1/18 9:26
Hi ,
Currently I have integrated solr into my project, but I meet with some
problems.
our project is a archives management system and different user have access to
different documents, therefor, we have two way to filter the permissions.
1. we can get all the documents from solr which match t
39 matches
Mail list logo
