Hi,
I'd like to build a UI plugin for solr, I can see all the ui related assets
in `/server/solr-webapp` but is there a way to add UI plugins without
modifying the ui assets under `/server/solr-webapp`?
by plugin, I mean some way I can add a some form of UI to the admin UI, and
even better, make
q={!parent which=type_s:parent}+type_s:child
-time_tdt:[2018-08-01T16:00:00Z TO 2018-08-04T15:59:59Z]
or
q={!parent which=type_s:parent v=$cq}&cq=+type_s:child
-time_tdt:[2018-08-01T16:00:00Z TO 2018-08-04T15:59:59Z]
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:13 PM Novin Novin wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I was try to
Hi Ahmed,
I am not aware of some extension point in UI, but you can maybe use some
combination of request handler and velocity response writer to get what you
want, but you will not have some link in UI.
Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Cons
On 8/21/2018 7:11 PM, Ahmed Musallam wrote:
I'd like to build a UI plugin for solr, I can see all the ui related assets
in `/server/solr-webapp` but is there a way to add UI plugins without
modifying the ui assets under `/server/solr-webapp`?
by plugin, I mean some way I can add a some form of U
Thank you all :) We have made the necessary changes to mitigate this issue
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 6:01 AM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/20/2018 9:55 PM, Ash Ramesh wrote:
> > We ran a bunch of deep paginated queries (offset of 1,000,000) with a
> > filter query. We set the timeout to 5 seconds and
Can someone advise me how to solve this issue, please?
Thank you so much!
--Michael
From: Michael Hu (CMBU)
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 1:22 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Mohsin Beg
Subject: Re: Solr core corrupted for version 7.4.0, please help!
Hi again,
Specs: 7.3.1 | 8 Shards | Solr Cloud
I was wondering how the timeAllowed parameter works when you architect your
cluster in a sharded and distributed manner. This is the curl command and
the timing
Query:
http://localhost:9983/solr/media/select?fq=someField:someRedactedValue&q=*:*&qq=*
timeAllowed is not a realtime (as well as java per se). There is only a few
places which it can break.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 4:09 PM Ash Ramesh wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Specs: 7.3.1 | 8 Shards | Solr Cloud
>
> I was wondering how the timeAllowed parameter works when you architect your
> cluster
Just to confirm. Are these cores write to the different data dirs?
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 4:08 PM Michael Hu (CMBU) wrote:
> Can someone advise me how to solve this issue, please?
>
>
> Thank you so much!
>
>
> --Michael
>
>
>
> From: Michael Hu (CMBU)
> Sent: F
Thanks you very much guys for help.
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 at 10:02 Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> q={!parent which=type_s:parent}+type_s:child
> -time_tdt:[2018-08-01T16:00:00Z TO 2018-08-04T15:59:59Z]
> or
> q={!parent which=type_s:parent v=$cq}&cq=+type_s:child
> -time_tdt:[2018-08-01T16:00:00Z TO 20
Hi,
We also have the same situation where we need to sort and group.sort
conflict each other can anyone find any solution on this. We also post
the query on stack overflow
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51843803/how-to-sort-on-sorted-group-documents-in-solr
--
Regards
Prashant Mankar
A
Hello again! I found a thread which seems relevant. It looks like someone
else found this occurred as well, but did not follow up with repro steps.
But I did! :)
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/TransactionLog-doesn-t-know-how-to-serialize-class-java-util-UUID-try-implementing-ObjectResolver-td4
On 8/16/2018 7:14 PM, Michael Hu (CMBU) wrote:
Environment:
* solr 7.4.1
* all cores are vanilla cores with "loadOnStartUp" set to false, and
"transient" set to true
* we have about 75 cores with "transientCacheSize" set to 32
Issue: we have core corruption from time to time (2-
It should not be required that your transient core size is greater
than or equal to the number of simultaneous updates.
Theoretically, it works like this:
- A request comes in and a reference-counted core is opened to serve
it. That may require loading the core.
- If another request comes in that
Hello!
I am doing wildcard queries to satisfy our search type ahead requirement for
both single and mutli word (phrases) queries.
I just noticed this error in the logs.
2018-08-22 16:36:48.433 INFO (qtp1654589030-18) [ x:suggestions]
o.a.s.c.S.Request [suggestions] webapp=/solr path=/select
having an issue where if i use edismax and search:
(creator:(Michael Carrier))
it goes to the default operator of AND so gets results where creator has
both those words in it.
however when a boolean is present:
*((pharmacy)) AND (creator:(Michael Carrier))*
*it seems to revert to OR and do a *
StrFields are, by definition, unanalyzed. They cannot have position
information because they are always one token. Searching for a phrase
on a single token makes no sense. The error message is a little odd,
but accurate.
You'll have to re-index as a text-based field if you want this kind of
functi
Hi Rohan,
Welcome!
To add just a bit to the good advice from Erick and Alex:
If you want a smaller issue to familiarize yourself with our
development workflow, the "newdev" label is a good place to start (as
the wiki page referenced above points out). But I would also suggest
taking a look at i
Perhaps my memory fails me, I remember setting it as a text field and it not
working. In any case, I have set it up as follows and things are working well.
Thanks Erick!
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 2
> The problem here is that you may have M requests queued up for the _same_
core, each with a new update request.
With transientCacheSize ==1, as soon as the update request for Core B is
received, Core B encounters data corruption not Core A. Both Core A and Core
B are receiving update requets.
Sorry I didn't understand your answer. Could you break that down a bit
further. Thank you :)
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 11:53 PM Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> timeAllowed is not a realtime (as well as java per se). There is only a few
> places which it can break.
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 4:09 PM As
For those of you who are developing applications with solr and are using
solrcloud in production: what are you doing locally? Cloud seems
unnecessary locally besides testing strictly for cloud specific use cases
or configurations. Am I totally off basis there? We are considering keeping
a “standard
Why not just revert to everything SolrCloud? The advantages you will have
is that you or your other team members are using the same APIs, parameters,
experience, etc. that they will be using when they go from one environment
to another. It would be less confusion to explain to someone why you are
d
We use Solr Cloud where we need sharding or near real time updates.
For non-sharded collections that are updated daily, we use master-slave.
There are some scaling and management advantages to the loose
coupling in a master slave cluster. Just clone a slave instance and
fire it up. Also, load be
I do quite a bit of "correctness" testing on a local stand-alone Solr,
as Walter says, that's often easier to debug, especially when working
through creating the proper analysis chains, do queries do what I
expect and the like.
That said, I'd never jump straight to SolrCloud implementations
withou
Then until you can try to fix the code, you need to increase your
transient cache size.
Having 100+ cores on a Solr node and a transient cache size of 1 to
"so jvm heap and os filecache is aligned to a manageable number of
open cores we can serve" implies that you are trying to compensate
for an
Oh, there are a number of reasons a text-based field wouldn't work,
omitPosition=true would be one ;).
Glad to hear it's working though.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Hanjan, Harinder
wrote:
> Perhaps my memory fails me, I remember setting it as a text field and it not
> workin
> Having 100+ cores on a Solr node and a transient cache size of 1
The original post clarified the current state. "we have about 75 cores with
"transientCacheSize" set to 32". If transientCacheSize is increased to match
current cores, we'll differ the issue. It's going to hit 100's cores per
sol
Hi Jan and Shawn,
So far I am still getting the error from the workaround and quick fix
methods.
Not sure if it is good to continue to use the files from Solr 7.3.1 while
waiting for the release of Solr 7.5.0?
Regards.
Edwin
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 at 11:21, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Ok noted.
On 8/22/2018 7:09 PM, mmb1234 wrote:
The original post clarified the current state. "we have about 75 cores with
"transientCacheSize" set to 32". If transientCacheSize is increased to match
current cores, we'll differ the issue. It's going to hit 100's cores per
solr instance shortly.
Majority o
On 8/22/2018 8:31 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
Hi Jan and Shawn,
So far I am still getting the error from the workaround and quick fix
methods.
Not sure if it is good to continue to use the files from Solr 7.3.1 while
waiting for the release of Solr 7.5.0?
You could check out the source code
Can someone please look into the following -
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51978351/solr-custom-similarity-using-a-field-from-the-indexed-document
Thanks!
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
32 matches
Mail list logo
