Re: indexing data to solrcloud with "implicit" is not distributing across cluster.

Hi Erik, Thanks for your reply. I have no issues of using either Implicit or Composite routing but I want to insert the documents to a particular shard, so that when I want to query the data , I can hit a particular shard, which gives me the results in lesser time as it hits only particular shard.

Re: indexing data to solrcloud with "implicit" is not distributing across cluster.

I suspect that when you create your collections, somehow you're not doing it like you expect. The red flag is: I tried creating a collection with compositeId routing which created shard1,shard2,shard3 , but when I indexed , all the documents went to one shard only This simply shouldn't be happen

Is it possible to use limit and sort with BlockJoin Facet?

Hi, I am working on applying parent/child types to search using Solr, and wanted to inquire about two things. 1) BlockJoin Facet Currently, there are two cores. The first core (the item core) has 16 million documents, and the second core (the product core) has 3 million documents. The product co

Re: indexing data to solrcloud with "implicit" is not distributing across cluster.

As per my understanding, distrib=false will be added in select query to restrict the document selection to particular shard. But how should i route the documents to only particular shard, is still my need. Thanks Hemanth -- Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html

RE: help on implicit routing

I am trying here implicit routing and want to create a collection with 3 shards with names Active,Inactive and Terminated. I created a _route_ field in schema and copied my status field which contains Active or Inactive or Terminated. I used copyfield in schema.xml to copy from status to _route_.