Hi all,
I have two joins and I need to link them using OR statement.
The first one is
> fq={!join fromIndex=master_Category_flip from=manufactureName_string
> to=nameString_string}visibility_string_mv:"Test_B2BUnit" AND
> itemtype_string:"Model"
which returns result A
The second one is
> fq=(
Hi team,
Currently I am using Solr 4.10 in tomcat. I have a one shard Solr
Cloud with 3 replicas. I set heap size to 15GB for each node. As I have big
data volume and large amount of query request. So always meet frequent full
GC issue. We have checked this and found that many memory was us
Hello,
I want to limit my facet data by using substring (only that contain
specified substring). My solr version is 4.8.0
e.g if doc with such type of string (field with such type of data is
multivalued and splited with "~")
India/maha/mumbai~India/gujarat/badoda
India/goa/xyz
India/raj/jaypu
Hello,
I want to limit my facet data by using substring (only that contain
specified substring). My solr version is 4.8.0
e.g if doc with such type of string (field with such type of data is
multivalued and splited with "~")
India/maha/mumbai~India/gujarat/badoda
India/goa/xyz
India/raj/jaypu
Hello,
I want to limit my facet data by using substring (only that contain
specified substring). My solr version is 4.8.0
e.g if doc with such type of string (field with such type of data is
multivalued and splited with "~")
India/maha/mumbai~India/gujarat/badoda
India/goa/xyz
India/raj/jaypu
What is the field type? Which Analyzers are configured?
How do you split at "~"? (You have to do it by yourself, or configure
some tokenizer for that.)
What do you get when you don't filter your facets?
What do you mean with "it is not working"? What is your result now?
-Michael
Am 15.09.2017 u
On 9/12/2017 7:21 AM, Nick Way wrote:
> Thank you very much Erik, Walter and Susheel.
>
> To be honest I didn't really understand the suggested routes (due to my
> limited knowledge) but managed to get things working by inserting my data
> with a double comma at the beginning eg:
>
> custom field "
On 9/11/2017 9:06 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
> We want to know about the indexing performance in the below mentioned
> scenarios, consider the total number of 10 string fields and total number
> of documents are 10 million.
>
> 1) indexed=true, stored=true
> 2) indexed=true, docValues=true
>
> Which on
bq: This means Solr may get update request during shutdown. I think
that is the reason we get CorruptIndexException.
This is unlikely, Solr should handle this quite well. More likely you
encountered some other issue, one possibility is that you had a disk
full situation and that was the root of y
Mike -
Thank you, this was very helpful. I've doing some research and
experimenting.
As currently configured solr is launched as a service. I looked at the
sol.in.sh file in /etc/default and we are running using a list of servers
for the zookeeper cluster.
so I think that is translated to -z zoo
Two things:
1> The query language does not implement pure boolean logic, although
you can get that behavior with careful parenthesizing, see:
https://lucidworks.com/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
2> add &debug=query to the url and see how things are actually parsed
to try to chase down why yo
Hello,
I have a single node Solr 6.4 server, with a Index of 100 Million documents.
The default "id" is the primary key of this index. Now, I would like to setup
an update process to insert new documents, and update existing documents based
on availability of value in another field (say Product
Hi Eric,
We are seeing the same issue on our production as well. Changing the
LockWriteTimeout to 5000 did not help. Please let me know if there are other
things we can try out to recover from this issue.
Thanks.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Pls note that we are using Solr 6.4.2.
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Not really. Do note that atomic updates require
1> all _original_ fields (i.e. fields that are _not_ destinations for
copyFields) have stored=true
2> no destination of a copyField has stored=true
3> compose the original document from stored fields and re-index the
doc. This latter just means that a
the field type=string
when I don't filter facets
my query without filter for facet is facet.field="all_data"
that time get o/p like this
India/maha/mumbai (2)
India/gujarat/badoda (1)
India/goa/xyz (1)
India/raj/jaypur (1)
1236/maha/890 (1)
India/maha/kolhapur (1)
India/maha
16 matches
Mail list logo
