Hello All,
I am trying to use sort parameter and phrase boosting together in search.
But, if I use the sort parameter, it seems like Phrase Boosting does not
work with it.
Thanks
Renuka Srishti
Renuka,
You have not told us nearly enough about your issue. What query? config?
cheers -- Rick
On 2017-09-08 05:42 AM, Renuka Srishti wrote:
Hello All,
I am trying to use sort parameter and phrase boosting together in search.
But, if I use the sort parameter, it seems like Phrase Boosting d
Thanks for the response, Erick. Unfortunately, no, these scores aren’t known
at index time: they’re specific to the user doing the search, and they can
change.
Cheers,
Eric
On 9/7/17, 7:58 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
I'd sidestep the problem ;)
Are these scores
1> known
We have several cloud collections, but this one is updated once a day with
a partial load, and once a week with a full load, followed by a delete
which is based upon an index_date field (timestamp of the solr record).
For this and related collections optimizing once per day is probably
acceptable.
On 9/7/2017 8:54 AM, Webster Homer wrote:
> I am not concerned about deleted documents. I am concerned that the same
> search gives different results after each search. The top document seems to
> cycle between 3 different documents
>
> I have an enhanced collections info api call that calls the co
Hello Everyone,
I am trying the new Solr 6.6 and using SolrPhpClient to create index having
info in an array.
$parts = array( '0' => array( 'id' => '0060248025', 'name' => 'Falling Up',
'author' => 'Shel Silverstein', 'inStock' => true, ), '1' => array( 'id' =>
'0679805273', 'name' => 'Oh, The
Thank you, Erick Erickson and Shawn Heisey for your excellent answers.
For some of our collections, it would seem that an occasional optimize
would be a good thing. However we have some collections that are updated
constantly
Would using the commit expungeDeletes help mitigate the issue?
I also c
Hi,
In solr cloud we want to track the last commit time on each node. The
information source is from the luke handler:
admin/luke?numTerms=0&wt=json, e.g.
- userData:
{
- commitTimeMSec: "1504895505447"
},
- lastModified: "2017-09-08T18:31:45.447Z"
I'm assuming the lastM
Here's Mike McCandless' blog on the topic:
https://www.elastic.co/blog/lucenes-handling-of-deleted-documents
The same options he mentions are available in Solr as both use Lucene
under the covers.
The long and short of it is that you can have a significant amount of
deleted documents in your ind
Sorting completely overrides scoring. By specifying a sort parameter
you're effectively telling Solr that you don't care about scoring,
order the docs by the sort criteria.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Rick Leir wrote:
> Renuka,
>
> You have not told us nearly enough about your issue. What que
Thanks Rick and Erick for your response.
Here is the situation where I want to use both sort and phrase boosting:
- I have designed a screen where results are showing in tabular form, in
each column I have applied sorting( using Solr sort parameter). There is
one keyword search box, in wh
11 matches
Mail list logo