Hi Chaula,
Omitnorms are basically used for index time boost & field length
normalization saying that I meant when you do omitNorms=true for any field
it stops storing additional stats regarding terms , length , boosts etc for
that field and hence drastically reduces the size of index.
It infact i
Hi,
I am in the middle of the similar use case as provided , we have three
different fields on UI for searchany, searchall and searchexcept
respectively for OR,AND and NOT query , I need to know how do I make them
work along with Edismax.
We can expect any/all of the fields to have free text.
Any
Hi,
I figured out when this issue happens, by observing the patterns with a
small set of data.
SPLITSHARD issues a soft-commit (with some of the files still not fully
written to disk). If I restart SOLR without issuing an explicit ,
the index directory is not fully written and the process is kill
I forgot to include the users list in my response below:
---
Interesting. I've been meaning to test the classifier in a similar way but
haven't had the time.
Basically what you did is created two classes:
1) A positive class
2) A very noisy negative class of "other stuff"
It was unc
Hi Rick. The use case is we use payloads to determine if a particular user
can or can't see a field, as of right now we have the query piece working
so that fields the user can't see don't contribute to the score but we
wanted to use a custom stored field visitor as well so that we can remove
fiel
Hi,
I have 90.000.000 documents in Solr and I need to compare "title" of
this document and get all documents with more than 80% similarity. PHP
have "similar_text" but it's not so smart inserting 90m documents in the
array...
Can I do some query in Solr which will give me the more the 80% si
If you already have the title of the document, then you could run that title as
a new query against the whole index and exclude the source document from the
results as a filter.
You could use the DisMax query parser:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+DisMax+Query+Parser
And
Yes, that is roughly how MLT works as well. You can also do a full OR-search on
the terms using LuceneQParser.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Junte Zhang
> Sent: Friday 25th August 2017 18:38
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Search by similarity?
>
> If you alread
On 8/24/2017 4:59 AM, Angel Todorov wrote:
> I also tested, of course, by setting a value of 0, expecting that it would
> work in the way I expect it to , but unfortunately - it doesn't. Nothing is
> committed in that case.
Settings of zero turn that part of the automatic commit off. That's a
way
Hi,
I am getting this error. i have deleted the file and restarted the server,
but this error doesn't go away.
What should I do to fix it?
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error opening new searcher
at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.(SolrCore.java:977)
at org.apa
Ok, after looking at the logs for some more time, i found that there are
more than one threads trying to load the core at startup time. This doesn't
make sense to me, is it configurable? Is there any reason why this is even
an option?
Aug 25, 2017 12:04:37 PM INFO (main) [ ] o.e.j.s.Server
jet
In that case you probably have two different cores pointing to the
_same_ data directory. Examine your core.properties files and see if
any dataDir variables are set
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:12 PM, Nawab Zada Asad Iqbal wrote:
> Ok, after looking at the logs for some more time,
You might find this useful:
https://lucidworks.com/2013/08/23/understanding-transaction-logs-softcommit-and-commit-in-sorlcloud/
bq: So I can never have soft auto commit after each update ? This
sounds like a bug to me.
No, rather a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between an
ACID
You need to enable docValues on the field (and completely reindex).
The standard inverted index structure is great for answering "for term
X in field Y, what docs does it appear in?". It's rotten for the
"uninverted" case: "For doc X, what is the value of field Y?". This
latter question is the one
Odd. The way core discovery works, it starts at SOLR_HOME and
recursively descends the directories. Whenever the recursion finds a
"core.properties" file it says "Aha, this must be a core". From there
it assumes the data directory is immediately below where it found the
core.properties file in the
You classpath is not correct. Unless it's a typo,
:"C:solr/server/solr-webapp/webapp/WEB-INF/lib/lucene-misc-6.5.1.jar"
is wrong, it should be:
"C:/solr/server/solr-webapp/webapp/WEB-INF/lib/lucene-misc-6.5.1.jar",
note the slash before "solr".
If that's not just a typo you need to look further as
Thanks Erik
I expected that but it is really not the case . I have only one core per
solr installation . Though i run 3 solr processes on each host.
If you see the thread names they are :coreLoadExecutor and qtp761960786-31
. If it was the case of two core pointing to one index (though it does not
Hi Erick,
Thanks for your reply.
I have check, it was not due to the typo. The same error occurs even with
the slash.
Regards,
Edwin
On 26 August 2017 at 05:16, Erick Erickson wrote:
> You classpath is not correct. Unless it's a typo,
> :"C:solr/server/solr-webapp/webapp/WEB-INF/lib/lucene-mis
Hi,
Isn't the Windows classpath separator a semi-colon? Like this:
cene-core-6.5.1.jar"*;*"C:solr/serve
Just saying.
Regards.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi Erick,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> I have check, it was not due to the typo. The same error occurs even
Hi,
In our set up there are two solr clouds:
Cloud A: production cloud serves both writes and reads
Cloud B: back up cloud serves only writes
Cloud A and B have the same shard configuration.
Write requests are sent to both cloud A and B. In certain circumstances
when Cloud A's update lags be
Hi Erick,
I spent some more time on this and found that if I modify 'core.properties'
to contain the following values (my core.propreties file is empty otherwise
and only being used for shard discovery), then the solr server works fine.
loadOnStartup=false
transient=false
The fact is that shards
21 matches
Mail list logo
