Hello,
>From what I understand, the AnalyzingInfixSuggester is using a simple
Lucene query; so I was wondering, how then would this suggester have better
performance than using a simple Solr 'select' query on a regular Solr index
(with an asterisk placed at the start and end of the query string).
Thank you all very much for your answers. That definitely explains it.
All the best,
Johannes
> Am 13.04.2017 um 17:03 schrieb Erick Erickson :
>
> bq: Why is it possible then to alter replicationFactor via
> MODIFYCOLLECTION in the collections API
>
> Because MODIFYCOLLECTION just changes prope
Hi,
I have a schema like:
name,
department,
type
type is an optional field. Some documents don't have that field. Let's
assume I have these:
Doc 1:
name: test
type: research
Doc 2:
name: test
type: developer
Doc 3:
name: test
I want to search name: test and type:research if type field exists
+name:test +(type:research (*:* -type:[* TO *]))
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a schema like:
>
> name,
> department,
> type
>
> type is an optional field. Some documents don't have that field. Let's
> assume I have these:
>
> Doc 1:
> name: test
> type:
What about setting a default value for the field? That is probably
faster than negative search clauses?
Regards,
Alex.
http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and experienced
On 16 April 2017 at 23:58, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> +name:test +(type:research (*:* -type:[*
