This is what I get when I run the code.
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error
from server at http://localhost:8983/solr/testing: Expected mime type
application/octet-stream but got text/html.
Error 401 require authentication
HTTP ERROR 401
Problem accessin
"You're telling Solr to return the highest scoring doc in each group.
However, you're asking to order the _groups_ in ascending score order
(i.e. the group with the lowest scoring doc first) of _any_ doc in
that group, not just the one(s) returned. These are two separate
things. "
This is quit
hi John, I am a bit confused here.
Let's focus on one field and one document.
Given this parsed phrase query :
manufacturer_split_syn:"vendor vendor"
and the document 1 :
D1
{"id":"1"
"manufacturer_split_syn" : "vendor"}
Are you expecting this to match ?
because it shouldn't ...
let's try to
Hi All,
I am facing this issue since very long, can you please provide your suggestion
on it ?
Regards,
Pratik Thaker
-Original Message-
From: Pratik Thaker [mailto:pratik.tha...@smartstreamrdu.com]
Sent: 09 February 2017 21:24
To: 'solr-user@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: DistributedU
Hi,
One of our 2 shard collections is rather small and gets all its entries
reindexed every 20 minutes orso. Now i just noticed maxDoc is ten times greater
than numDoc, the merger is never scheduled but settings are default. We just
overwrite the existing entries, all of them.
Here are the sta
Hi Markus,
maxDocs includes deletions :
Deleted Docs: 74026 + Num Docs: 8336 = Max Doc:82362
Cheers
-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search Consultant, R&D Software Engineer, Director
Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nab
Hello - i know it includes all those deleted/overwritten documents. But having
89,9 % deleted documens is quite unreasonable, so i would expect the
mergeScheduler to kick in at least once in a while. It doesn't with default
settings so i am curious what is wrong.
Our large regular search cluste
I am not completely sure that the potential benefit of merging less docs in
sharded pagination overcomes the additional time needed to apply the
filtering function query.
I would need to investigate more in details the frange internals.
Cheers
-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search C
you can view some of my analyses here that has caused me grief and
confusion: http://imgur.com/a/Fcht3
here is a debug output:
"rawquerystring":"\"ZIMMER:ZIMMER US\"",
"querystring":"\"ZIMMER:ZIMMER US\"",
"parsedquery":"(+DisjunctionMaxQuery((manufacturer_syn:\"zimmer
zimmer\" | manufact
@alessandro
Elastic-search has it:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/search-request-min-score.html
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 1:49 PM, alessandro.benedetti
wrote:
> I am not completely sure that the potential benefit of merging less docs in
> sharded pagination overcom
This may be incorrect, but I think that even if a merge happened and the disk
space is actually released, the deleted docs count will still be there.
What about your index size ? is the index 10 times bigger than expected ?
Cheers
-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search Consultant, R
Hello,
Is there any recommended way to achieve auto-suggestion in textboxes using
Solr?
I'm new to Solr, but right now I have achieved this functionality by using
an example I found online, doing this:
I added a copy field, which is of the following type:
Hello,
How can I enable Gzip compression for Solr 6.0 to save bandwidth between
the server and clients?
Thanks,
Mahmoud
On 4/12/2017 5:11 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> One of our 2 shard collections is rather small and gets all its entries
> reindexed every 20 minutes orso. Now i just noticed maxDoc is ten times
> greater than numDoc, the merger is never scheduled but settings are default.
> We just overwrite the ex
Hi,
I think you got an old post. I would have a look at the built-in
feature, first. These posts can help you to get a quick overview:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Suggester
http://alexbenedetti.blogspot.it/2015/07/solr-you-complete-me.html
https://lucidworks.com/2015/03/04/
John,
Double quotes is a sign of a phrase query (and round braces inside of
double quotes is a horrible to think about beast). Since the query is a
disjunction of phrases and the shingle it has no chance to match any of
indexed values from screenshots. Probably you need to flip
autoGeneratePhraseQ
We have a Solr cluster that still takes queries that join between cores (I
know, bad). We can't change that anytime soon however and I was hoping
there was a band-aid I could use in the mean time to make deployments of
new nodes cleaner.
When we want to add a new node to cluster we'll have a brief
Hi Mahmoud
I assume you are running Solr 'behind' a web application, so Solr is not
directly on the net.
The gzip compression is an Apache thing, and relates to your web application.
Connections to Solr are within your infrastructure, so you might not want to
gzip them. But maybe your setup i
On 4/10/2017 8:59 AM, David Kramer wrote:
> I’ve done quite a bit of searching on this. Pretty much every page I
> find says it’s a bad idea and won’t work well, but I’ve been asked to
> at least try it to reduce the number of completely unrelated results
> returned. We are not trying to normalize
Forgot to mention. We're using solr 5.5.2 in Solr cloud mode. Everything is
single sharded at the moment as the collections are still quite small.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Callum Lamb wrote:
> We have a Solr cluster that still takes queries that join between cores (I
> know, bad). We can
On 4/10/2017 3:47 AM, ankur.168 wrote:
> Hi All,I am trying to use solr with 2 cores interacting with 2 different
> databases, one core is executing full-import successfully where as when I am
> running for 2nd one it is throwing table or view not found exception. If I
> am using the query directly
No good ideas here with current Solr. I just raised SOLR-10484 for the
generic ability to take a replica out of action (including the
ADDREPLICA operation).
Your understanding is correct, Solr will route requests to active
replicas. Is it possible that you can load the "from" core first
_then_ add
Well, just because ES has it doesn't mean it's A Good Thing. IMO, it's
just a "feel good" kind of thing for people who don't really
understand scoring.
>From that page: "Note, most times, this does not make much sense, but
is provided for advanced use cases."
I've written enough weasel-worded cav
Yes, this is very strange. My bet: you have something
custom, a setting, indexing code, whatever that
is getting in the way.
Second possibility (really stretching here): your
merge settings are set to 10 segments having to exist
before merging and somehow not all the docs in the
segments are repla
Alessandro:
I should have been explicit that I'm hypothesizing somewhat here, so
believe me at your own risk ;)
bq: So it means that group sorting is independent of the group head sorting
that's my hypothesis, but it's _not_ based on knowing the code.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:05 A
The release candidate for POI was just cut...unfortunately, I think after Nick
Burch fixed the 'PolylineTo' issue...thank you, btw, for opening that!
That'll be done within a week unless there are surprises. Once that's out, I
have to update a few things, but I'd think we'd have a candidate for
We can do that in most cases and that's what we've been doing up until now
to prevent failed requests.
All the more incentive to get rid of those joins then I guess!
Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> No good ideas here with current Solr. I just raised SOLR-10484
Hi,
I am still quite new to Solr. I have the following setup:
A SolrCloud setup with
38 nodes,
maxShardsPerNode=2,
implicit routing with routing field,
and replication factor=2.
Now, I want to add replica. This works fine by first increasing the
maxShardsPerNode to a higher number and then a
Does the KeywordTokenizer make each value into a unitary string or does it take
the whole list of values and make that a single string?
I really hope it is the former. I can’t find this in the docs (including
JavaDocs).
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.or
Hi Wunder,
I think it's the first option: if you have 3 values then the analyzer
chain is executed three times.
Andrea
On 12/04/17 18:45, Walter Underwood wrote:
Does the KeywordTokenizer make each value into a unitary string or does it take
the whole list of values and make that a single st
really <3>. replicationFactor is used to set up your collection
initially, you have to be able to change your topology afterwards so
it's ignored thereafter.
Once your replica is added, it's automatically made use of by the collection.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Johannes Knaus wrote:
> Hi,
Hello,
I am using S3 as the primary store for data directory of core. To achieve
this, I have the following in Solrconfig.xml:
**
* s3a://amar-hdfs/solr*
* /usr/local/Cellar/hadoop/2.7.3/libexec/etc/hadoop*
* true*
* 4*
* true*
* 16384*
* true*
* true*
* 16*
* 192*
* *
When I acces
Thanks for your response Shawn and Wunder.
Hi Shawn,
Here is the system config:
Total system memory = 512 GB
each server handles two 500 MB cores
Number of solr docs per 500 MB core = 200 MM
The average heap usage is around 4-6 GB. When the read starts using the
Cursor approach, the heap usage
The idea is to not return poorly matching results, not to limit the number of
results returned. One query may have hundreds of excellent matches and another
query may have 7. So cutting off by the number of results is trivial but not
useful.
Again, we are not doing this for performance reasons
Hi David,
A function query named "query" returns the score for the given subquery.
Combined with frange query parser this is possible. I tried it in the past.I am
searching the original post. I think it was Yonik's post.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Function+Queries
Ahmet
Fine. It can’t be done. If it was easy, Solr/Lucene would already have the
feature, right?
Solr is a vector-space engine. Some early engines (Verity VDK) were
probabilistic engines. Those do give an absolute estimate of the relevance of
each hit. Unfortunately, the relevance of results is just
Hi Amarnath,
From this log snippet:
"
2017-04-12 17:53:44.900 INFO
(searcherExecutor-12-thread-1-processing-x:amar1) [ x:amar1]
o.a.s.c.SolrCore [amar1] Registered new searcher Searcher@3f61e7f2[amar1]
main{ExitableDirectoryReader(UninvertingDirectoryReader(Uninverting(_16(6.4.2):c97790)
Uninv
Hi,
I cannot find it. However it should be something like
q=hello&fq={!frange l=0.5}query($q)
Ahmet
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017, 10:07:54 PM GMT+3, Ahmet Arslan
wrote:
Hi David,
A function query named "query" returns the score for the given subquery.
Combined with frange query parser this is
And what is the rows parameter?
12 апр. 2017 г. 21:32 пользователь "Chetas Joshi"
написал:
> Thanks for your response Shawn and Wunder.
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Here is the system config:
>
> Total system memory = 512 GB
> each server handles two 500 MB cores
> Number of solr docs per 500 MB core = 200
I am running a query that returns 10 MM docs in total and the number of
rows per page is 100K.
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> And what is the rows parameter?
>
> 12 апр. 2017 г. 21:32 пользователь "Chetas Joshi"
> написал:
>
> > Thanks for your response Shawn and Wu
Is it possible to create a core on a master SOLR server and have it
automatically replicated to a new slave core? We're running SOLR 6.2 at the
moment, and manually creating the core on the master, and then the slave. Once
we feed the master we're good to go. My manager approached me with a ch
David I think it can be done, but a score has no real *meaning* to your
domain other than the one you engineer into it. There's no 1-100 scale that
guarantees at 100 that your users will love the results.
Solr isn't really a turn key solution. It requires you to understand more
deeply what relevan
On 4/12/2017 2:05 PM, Pouliot, Scott wrote:
> Is it possible to create a core on a master SOLR server and have it
> automatically replicated to a new slave core? We're running SOLR 6.2 at the
> moment, and manually creating the core on the master, and then the slave.
> Once we feed the master
Yeah...I need to get SOLR Cloud up and running. For some reason, I have yet to
succeed with it using an external Zookeeper for some reason. Ugghhh
Thanks for the confirmation!
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 4:19 PM
To
Oh my. Returning 100K rows per request is usually poor practice.
One hopes these are very tiny docs.
But this may well be an "XY" problem. What kinds of information
are you returning in your docs and could they all be docValues
types? In which case you would be waaay far ahead by using
the various
I don't understand the first option, what is each value? Keyword tokenizer
emits single token, analogous to string type.
On Wednesday, April 12, 2017, 7:45:52 PM GMT+3, Walter Underwood
wrote:
Does the KeywordTokenizer make each value into a unitary string or does it take
the whole list of v
Thank you! That worked.
From: Ahmet Arslan
Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 at 3:15 PM
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" , David Kramer
Subject: Re: Filtering results by minimum relevancy score
Hi,
I cannot find it. However it should be something like
q=hello&fq={!frange l=0.5}query($q)
Ah
Thanks!!I appreciate for your quick reply.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Japanese-character-is-garbled-when-using-TikaEntityProcessor-tp4329217p4329657.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I am getting back 100K results per page.
The fields have docValues enabled and I am getting sorted results based on
"id" and 2 more fields (String: 32 Bytes and Long: 8 Bytes).
I have a solr Cloud of 80 nodes. There will be one shard that will get top
100K docs from each shard and apply merge sort
Hi,
I'm using Solr 6.4.0. The schema was created on 6.4.0 and I indexed several
hundred thousand documents and everything was fine.
Now I added one field to the schema:
I suddenly start getting this error for certain queries ( not all queries
and even for queries that have nothing to do with t
On 4/12/2017 5:19 PM, Chetas Joshi wrote:
> I am getting back 100K results per page.
> The fields have docValues enabled and I am getting sorted results based on
> "id" and 2 more fields (String: 32 Bytes and Long: 8 Bytes).
>
> I have a solr Cloud of 80 nodes. There will be one shard that will ge
Hi Walter,
May I ask a tangential question? I'm curious the following line you wrote:
> Solr is a vector-space engine. Some early engines (Verity VDK) were probabilistic engines. Those
do give an absolute estimate of the relevance of each hit. Unfortunately, the relevance of results
is just no
On 4/12/2017 8:04 PM, Prashant Saraswat wrote:
> I'm using Solr 6.4.0. The schema was created on 6.4.0 and I indexed several
> hundred thousand documents and everything was fine.
>
> Now I added one field to the schema:
>
> stored="true" required="false"/>
>
> I suddenly start getting this error f
Hi Shawn,
The listing_lastmodified field was not changed. I only added a new field. I
have removed the field, but I still get the error.
Thanks
Prashant
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/12/2017 8:04 PM, Prashant Saraswat wrote:
> > I'm using Solr 6.4.0. The schema w
You're missing the point of my comment. Since they already are
docValues, you can use the /export functionality to get the results
back as a _stream_ and avoid all of the overhead of the aggregator
node doing a merge sort and all of that.
You'll have to do this from SolrJ, but see CloudSolrStream.
Thanks Rick,
I already running Solr on my infrastructure and behind a web application.
The web application is working as a proxy before Solr, so I think I can
compress the content on Solr end. But I have made it on the proxy now.
Thanks again,
Mahmoud
> On Apr 12, 2017, at 4:31 PM, Rick Leir
So I have a field named "key" that uses KeywordTokenizer and has
multiValued="true" set. A doc like
val one
yet another value
third
My field will have exactly three indexed tokens
val one
yet another value
third
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> I don't
57 matches
Mail list logo
