Hello, Friend!
You absolutely need to commit to make delete visible. And even more, when
"softCommit" is issued in Lucene level, there is a flag which ignores
deletes for sake of performance.
06 янв. 2017 г. 10:55 пользователь "Dorian Hoxha"
написал:
Hello friends,
Based on what I've read, I th
I figured our problem with the filesystem, by default the root logger is
configured with the CONSOLE logger, which is NOT rotated and eventually
filled up the file system. That doesn't exonerate the CDCR logging problem
though. The thing writes a huge amount of junk to the logs, information
that lo
I occasionally see this error in our logs:
2017-01-05 20:48:46.664 ERROR (SolrConfigHandler-refreshconf)
[c:sial-catalog-material s:shard2 r:core_node2
x:sial-catalog-material_shard2_replica1] o.a.s.s.IndexSchema This
IndexSchema is not mutable.
None of our indexes are mutable, nor are we trying t
Hi Mikhail,
I've turned on DEBUG level logging, but I still only see the main request
logged, and no requests for the subqueries.
Could it be a version issue? We are running Solr 4.10.
Thanks,
-Peter
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 1:56 AM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Peter,
> Subquery should also log i
On 1/6/2017 8:21 AM, Webster Homer wrote:
> I figured our problem with the filesystem, by default the root logger
> is configured with the CONSOLE logger, which is NOT rotated and
> eventually filled up the file system. That doesn't exonerate the CDCR
> logging problem though. The thing writes a hu
I was seeing something like this, and it turned out to be a problem with
our autoCommit and autoSoftCommit settings. We had overly aggressive
settings that eventually started failing with errors around too many
warming searchers etc...
You can test this by doing a commit and seeing if the replicas
Which solrj version are you using and can you point which line exactly
throws the error?
Thnx
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 2:04 AM, gayathri...@tcs.com
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Im using solr 5.4.0 while running my code i get below eroor please suggest
> what has to be done
>
> public static void main(
Hello Shahi, would you clarify your requirement or issue from Solr
perspective. From the above its not clear what you are asking.
You use Solr for indexing some data which later you can search upon.
Keeping this in mind, can you elaborate what kind of data you are indexing
and what are you tryin
Hi,
I found the same thing listed here at :
http://googleweblight.com/?lite_url=http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32105513/solr-bad-return-type-error&ei=xQ0ZJDXt&lc=en-IN&s=1&m=940&host=www.google.co.in&ts=1483722084&sig=AF9NedkxZ3LIU1o5BOd8inhSmW5Q5azbHA
HttpSolrClient has a constructor that a
We recently had a problem where the solr transaction log became corrupted
during a data load. The collection was a CDCR source and we started seeing
problems on both source and target.
This happened while testing and was not in a production system. So we just
deleted both collections and recreated
If you just deleted the tlog files on the source, you'd likely miss
updates, right?
I can think of two ways to get source and target back in sync:
1> go ahead and delete the tlogs, then re-index from some point guaranteed
to have been propagated to the target _before_ the tlog went wonky.
2> rebu
On 1/6/2017 10:09 AM, Webster Homer wrote:
> This happened while testing and was not in a production system. So we
> just deleted both collections and recreated them after fixing the root
> cause. If this had been a production system that would not have been
> acceptable. What is the best way to re
Hi Jeffery,
I submitted a patch to the README of the learning to rank example folder,
trying to explain better how to produce a training set given a log with
interaction data.
Patch is available here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9929
And you can see the new version of the README
We've hit this issue again since solr defaults new fields to string type
which has docvalues. Changing those to be lowercase text does not remove
the docvalues and breaks faceting. Is there a way to remove docvalues for a
field w/o starting fresh?
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Yonik Seeley wro
I'm assuming you're using classic schema factory?
Do this error show up in the log correlated to your use of the
config API to configure CDCR? If so, please do three things:
1> raise a JIRA
2> paste the command you use to configure CDCR
3> paste in any more info from the ERROR in the log, especial
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8208 is resolved for 6.1.
I don't know why 4.10 didn't throw exception on referring to [subquery],
which is absent there.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Peter Matthew Eichman
wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> I've turned on DEBUG level logging, but I still only
Thanks, we will look into the feasibility of a Solr upgrade. If not, is
there anything in 4.10 that would allow us to do something similar, or
would we be stuck with denormalizing our data at index time?
-Peter
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/
After some more digging, I narrowed it down to filtering. Without any filters,
the MLT is back to it's normal performance (8ms average response time for our
case). The issue goes away with 6.0 upgrade.
The hot method is Lucene's DisiPriorityQueue downHeap(), which takes 5X more
calls in 5.5.2
Denormalising works on small numbers, but it hits ceil quite soon, because
it scales hard.
People did such snippet enrichment in apps for ages. There is nothing
special in it.
Probably someone can port it to 4.10 as a plugin.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 12:08 AM, Peter Matthew Eichman
wrote:
> Thanks
Hello!We are on Solr 5.4.1 and basic authentication is enabled.We are trying
to use shards to combine 2 Solr cores but getting a "401 Unauthorized" error
while querying from the admin UI. Basically internal connection errors out
with shards. Also tried using "shardcredentials" as mentioned here
htt
Hi,
can we use a psuedo-field in json.facet api ? is there any example like the
one below ?
json.facet={
my_histogram: {
type: terms,
field: new_field:my_function(my_solr_field, "return_as_integer")
}
}
Thanks,
Radhakrishnan D
ah. very nice Diego. Thanks.
On 1/6/2017 1:52 PM, Diego Ceccarelli (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) wrote:
Hi Jeffery,
I submitted a patch to the README of the learning to rank example folder,
trying to explain better how to produce a training set given a log with
interaction data.
Patch is available here:
Previously I have configured Solr 4.x deployments with both SSL (https) and
non-SSL (http) via Jetty configurations. I know the way to configure SSL in
Solr 5.2+ has changed. I followed these instructions and was able to
successfully configure a standalone Solr instance for SSL on port 8984:
ht
23 matches
Mail list logo
