Yeah that looks like the _source that elasticsearch has.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Michael Joyner wrote:
> Have a "store only" text field that contains a serialized (json?) of the
> master object for deserilization as part of the results parsing if you are
> wanting to save a DB lookup.
>
Hello searcherers,
Is there a solr/lucene "planet" like planet.postgresql.org ? If not, what
are some blogs/rss/feeds that I should follow to learn what's happening in
the solr/lucene worlds ?
Thank You
@Alex
Yes, that should also support more efficient serialization(binary) like
msgpack etc.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:33 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> HTTP 2 and whatever that Google's new protocol is are both into
> pipelining over the same connection (HTTP 1.1 too, but not as well).
> So,
I am not aware of any aggregator like that. And I looked, hard.
I, myself, publish a newsletter (Solr Start, in signature, every 2
weeks) that usually has a couple of links to cool Solr stuff I found.
Subscribing to newsletter also gives access to full archives...
To find the links, I have a bunc
Thanks Alex, some kind of weekly newsletter would be great (examples I
subscribe to are db weekly, postgresql weekly, redis weekly).
If it makes sense, to make it weekly, add some sponsor(targeted) to it, and
it should be nicer. Maybe even include es,lucene if there's not enough
content or there's
I tried weekly. I did not have personal bandwidth for that. It
actually takes quite a lot of time to do the newsletter, especially
since I also try to update the website (a separate messy/hacky story).
And since English is not my first language and writing short copy is
harder than a long one :-)
Hi Erick,
I gave this a try.
These are my results. There is a record with "John D. Smith", and another named
"John Doe".
1.] {!complexphrase inOrder=true}name:"John D.*" ... does not fetch any
results.
2.] {!complexphrase inOrder=true}name:"John D*" ... fetches both results.
Second observ
Please let me know about your conclusion ?
i am also in same confusion.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Dorian Hoxha
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that there is a new release on every lucene release. Do you always
> use the latest version since it may have bugs (ex most cassandra
> productions are ol
Hi,
I have a simple query that should intersect with dateRange1 and NOT be
contained within dateRange2. I have tried the following options:
WORKS:
+{!field f=dateRange1 op=Intersects v='[2016-11-22T12:01:00Z TO
2016-11-22T13:59:00Z]'} +(*:* -{!field f=dateRange2 op=Contains
v='[2016-11-22T12:01
I migrated an application from Solr 4 to Solr 6. solrconfig.xml and
schema.xml are sensibly the same. The JVM params are also pretty much
similar. The indicces have each about 2 million documents. No particular
tuning was done to Solr 6 beyond the default settings. Solr 4 is running in
Tomcat 7.
I am not sure but I heard this in one of discussions, that you cant migrate
directly from solr 4 to solr 6. It has to be incremental like solr 4 to solr 5
and then to solr 6. I might be wrong but is worth trying.
Regards,
Prateek Jain
-Original Message-
From: Max Bridgewater [mailto:
It depends highly on what your requests look like, and which ones are slower.
If you're request mix is heterogeneous, find the types of requests
that seem to have the largest slowdown and let us know what they look
like.
-Yonik
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Max Bridgewater
wrote:
> I migrate
_How_ does it "not work"? You haven't told us what you expect .vs.
what you get back.
Plus a sample doc that that violates your expectations (just the
dateRange field) would
also help.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Sandeep Khanzode
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a simple query that should
bq: This seems like it might even be a good approach for creating
additional cores primarily for the purpose of caching
I think you're making it too complex, especially for such a small data set ;)
1> All the data is memory mapped anyway, so what's not in the JVM will
be in the OS's
memory eventu
any help here?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Wonderful Little Things <
amantandon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to do the sorting on multiple fields using the JSON-facet API, so
> is this available? And if it is, then what would be the syntax?
>
> Thanks,
> Am
You said "I can't compile" but then showed us the line for
_running_ Solr so I'm
really confused what your problem is. So:
1> can you compile? IOW, if you execute "ant server dest" from the
/solr
directory, does it run to completion? You should see "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" after a
few minutes indica
With those settings, you never commit the documents on the target,
thus they are never searchable on the target.
No, I do _not_ recommend you issue a manual commit on the target,
that was just a manual test to see if your issue was about commits. I'd
just either set openSearcher to true in the se
The autocommit settings on leaders and replicas
can be slightly offset in terms of wall clock time so
docs that have been committed on one node may
not have been committed on the other. Your comment
that you can optimize and fix this is evidence that this
is what you're seeing.
to test this:
1> st
Hello all,
It seems I can't find a "getFacets" method for SolrJ when handling a
query response from a json.facet call.
I see that I can get a top level opaque object via "Object obj =
response.getResponse().get("facets");"
Is there any code in SolrJ to parse this out as an easy to use navig
Hi All,
We're running a fairly non-standard solr configuration. We ingest into named
shards in master cores and then replicate out to slaves running solr cloud. So
in effect we are using solrcloud only to manage the config files and more
importantly to look after the cluster state. Our corpu
Thanks a lot Eric..:-)
On 21 Nov 2016 20:09, "Erick Erickson [via Lucene]" <
ml-node+s472066n4306659...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> In a word, "no". Resending the same document will
>
> 1> delete the old version (based on ID)
> 2> index the document just sent.
>
> When a document comes in, Solr can't
This sounds a lot like:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9706
Could you attach your patch to that issue if you think it's the same?
And please copy/paste your e-mail in a comment if you would, you've
obviously done more research on the cause than I did and that'd save
some work wheneve
Hi,
I'm looking for some suggestions on enabling search terms to include
facet fields as well. In my use case, we've a bunch of product and
corresponding release fields which are explicitly used as facets. But what
we are observing is that end users tend to use the product name as part of
the se
Thank you again Erick. Added autoSoftCommit settings in target solrconfig and
it works now.
As CDCR does not auto-commit on the target upon replication, is there a
specific reason for this?
Thanks,
Gayatri
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr6-CDCR-indexing
Thanks for your response Erick.
Yes this looks like the issue we're seeing. I'll paste in the relevant parts
of my email to the issue. The scenario you're describing is a little different
to ours, so I don't think the naïve patch we have necessarily suits. I'll do a
bit more research and see
Well, it would be awkard to get right. At what point
should a commit be sent? When the queue was
empty? That could be after every document
when incoming docs were slow. And what about the
other shards? CDCR doesn't really know when _all_
the docs in _all_ the shards have been sent. On the
autocommi
This looks similar to what was discussed by Ted Sullivan at:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/author/tedsullivan/ (AutoFilter)
There is a repository somewhere linked from an article as well. I'd
start from the beginning, as articles get increasingly more esoteric
towards the end :-)
Regards,
Alex.
On 11/17/2016 12:25 AM, Dorian Hoxha wrote:
> I see that there is a new release on every lucene release. Do you
> always use the latest version since it may have bugs (ex most
> cassandra productions are old compared to latest `stable` version
> because they're not stable). How much behind do you u
Thanks for the pointer Alex . I'll go through all four articles, thanksgiving
will be fun :-)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-include-facet-fields-in-keyword-search-tp4306967p4307020.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all,
Here's my situation:
In cloud mode.
1. I created a collection called "test" and then modified the
managed-schemaI got an error as shown in picture 2.
2. To get enough error message, I checked solr logs and get message
shown in picture 3.
3. If I corrected the managed-sche
Sorry, wrong message.
To correct.
In cloud mode.
1. I created a collection called "test" and then modified the
managed-schemaI, write something wrong, for example
"id", then reload collection would failed.
2. Then I drop the collection "test" and delete configs form zookeeper.
It w
Have you run IndexUpgrader?
Index Format Changes
Solr 6 has no support for reading Lucene/Solr 4.x and earlier indexes. Be
sure to run the Lucene IndexUpgrader included with Solr 5.5 if you might
still have old 4x formatted segments in your index. Alternatively: fully
optimize your index with So
Hi All,
I am struggling to get the difference of 2 days and return the matching
documents.
I got the below function query to work, however I am unable to pass a
fieldname for *u *in frange function.
{!frange l=0 u=86400}ms(NOW,StartDate__d)
What I really want to do is compare the start dat
Gurus,
I am new to Solr, I have a requirement to index entire pdf/word documents
using Solr Tika. Which was successful and able to get the search results
displayed. Now I need to fine tune the results or adjust index so the
negative statements should be filtered out the results like my input text
How do you _know_ it is not 'apparent' ? Is it because it is preceded by
the keyword 'no'? Just that keyword? At what maximum distance?
Regards,
Alex
On 23 Nov 2016 2:59 PM, "Hem Naidu"
wrote:
> Gurus,
>
> I am new to Solr, I have a requirement to index entire pdf/word documents
> using Solr
I wouldn't do it this way, it's far more complex than you need. Try
fq=Startdate__D:[NOW/DAY-7DAYS TO NOW/DAY+1DAY].
Why the weird NOW/DAY+1DAY? Well, that makes fq clauses far
more likely to be reused, see:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/2012/02/23/date-math-now-and-filter-queries/
Best,
Erick
On
The mail server is pretty heavy-handed at deleting attachments, none of your
(presumably) screenshots came through.
You also haven't told us what version of Solr you're using.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Jerome Yang wrote:
> Sorry, wrong message.
> To correct.
>
> In cloud mode
37 matches
Mail list logo
