Hi,
I will create a query multiple collections in solr where query in mysql
like this
"SELECT colection1.field_colection1 FROM colection1 WHERE
colection1.field_colection1 NOT IN (SELECT colection2.field_colection2
FROM colection2);".
But I find it difficult for create that query. Please h
Hello,
We are migrating from solr 4.10.1 to solr 5.5.2, and it seems that the mm
parameter is not working the same anymore.
In fact, as soon as there is a word not in the index in the query, no
matter what mm value I send, I get no answer as if my query is a pure AND
query.
Does anyone have a cl
Hi,
SOLR-7036 introduced a new faster method for group.facet, which uses
UnInvertedField.
It was patched for version 4.x.
Over the last week, my colleague uploaded a new patch that work against the
trunk.
We would really appreciate if anyone could take a look at it and give us
some feedback about
oh sorry wrote too fast. had to change the defaultOperator to OR.
Elisabeth
2016-07-27 10:11 GMT+02:00 elisabeth benoit :
>
> Hello,
>
> We are migrating from solr 4.10.1 to solr 5.5.2, and it seems that the mm
> parameter is not working the same anymore.
>
> In fact, as soon as there is a word
Hi Ryan,
can you explain this ?
" I'd like the search request to search multiple
fields, but only elevate if the query is found in one of the fields."
You mean, that you want to apply the elevation component only if the user
selected a particular field in the query ?
If i remember well, you have t
There are some examples on the web for this:
http://yonik.com/solr/query-syntax/
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/634765/using-or-and-not-in-solr-query
If you are using .NET, maybe also try SolrNet.
Maybe those help.
-Original Message-
From: Hardika Catur S [mailto:hardika.sa...@sol
When i search for "plato" it return me all records with
"plato,platos,plato's"
When i search for "platos" it return me all records with "platos,plato's"
When i search for "plato's" it return me all records with "platos,plato's"
Please suggest me how to configure schema.xml .Below is my "text" sett
After enhancing the server with SSDs I'm trying to speed up indexing.
The server has 16 CPUs and more than 100G RAM.
JAVA (1.8.0_92) has 24G.
SOLR is 4.10.4.
Plain XML data to load is 218G with about 96M records.
This will result in a single index of 299G.
I tried with 4, 8, 12 and 16 concurrent
I'd _strongly_ recommend you become familiar with the
admin>>(your core)>>analysis page. It tells you exactly
what each filter does to your input and makes it much
simpler to answer questions like this. Hover over each
of the gray letter pairs (e.g. "SF" will be gray, hover over
it and you'll see t
I'd actually recommend you move to a SolrJ solution
or similar. Currently, you're putting a load on the Solr
servers (especially if you're also using Tika) in addition
to all indexing etc.
Here's a sample:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
Dodging the question I know, bu
The REBALANCELEADERS stuff was put in to deal with 100s of leaders
winding up on a single machine in a case where extremely high
throughput was required. Until you get into pretty high scale the
additional "work" on a leader is minimal. So unless your CPU usage is
consistently significantly higher
So writing some SolrJ doing the same job as the DIH script
and using that concurrent will solve my problem?
I'm not using Tika.
I don't think that DIH is my problem, even if it is not the best solution right
now.
Nevertheless, you are right SolrJ has higher performance, but what
if I have the sam
I have a document with multiple different children. Below is the structure:
1
true
11
false
22
6
12
false
11
7276
13
false
100419
14
false
245
2
true
Well, at least it'll be easier to debug in my experience. Simple example.
At some point you'll call CloudSolrClient.add(doc list). Comment just that
out and you'll be able to isolate whether the issue is querying the be or
sending to Solr.
Then CloudSolrClient (assuming SolrCloud) has efficiencies
I have a document with multiple different children. Below is the structure:
1
true
11
false
22
6
12
false
11
7276
13
false
100419
14
false
245
2
true
Sorry for the double post.
If there is a problem in single index then it might also be in CloudSolr.
As far as I could figure out from INFOSTREAM, documents are added to segments
and terms are "collected". Duplicate term are "deleted" (or whatever).
These deletes (or whatever) are not concurrent.
I have a lines like:
BD 0 [W
On 7/26/2016 5:30 PM, Nirav Patel wrote:
> OK, I can see '/configs' directory in Solr UI and under that I can see
> configuration fo my 'test' collection. BUt this all seemed to be
> disjointed information. Doc is definitely not clear. And what that
> Tree represent anyway where;s information for t
I tried using post tool with following parameters. Looks like its not
uploading files if it doesn't have known extension.
./bin/post -c mycol1 -params "separator=%09" -type text/tsv -filetypes tsv
/dev/datascience/pod1/population/baseline/
/usr/java/jdk1.8.0_102//bin/java -classpath
/home/xact
Hi All,
We have a SolrCloud cluster with 3 Virtual Machines, assigning 4GB to the Java
Heap.
Recently we added a number of collections to the machine going from around 80
collections (each with 3 shards x 3 replicas) to 150 collections
We've hit Heap errors.
That wasn't the surprise, the surpr
Got it. That make sense.
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 7/26/2016 5:30 PM, Nirav Patel wrote:
> > OK, I can see '/configs' directory in Solr UI and under that I can see
> > configuration fo my 'test' collection. BUt this all seemed to be
> > disjointed informat
Hi All,
I am upgrading from solr 4 to 6.
In solr 4 I have a schema.xml that is under version control.
But solr 6 has the notion of a managed schema that could be modified via a
solr api call.
This seems great and flexible, but my assumption is that in this case
zookeeper becomes the authoritative
Using classic schema is perfectly acceptable/reasonable, you can
continue to do so freely (you'll have to change to
ClassicSchemaFactory though).
Also, you can freely edit managed-schema just as you did schema.xml.
The "trick" here is that you have to take some care _not_ to issue
commands that mo
I'm looking to create a merge strategy for a custom QParserPlugin I have. The
plugin works fine on collections with one shard. I was very surprised to see
it throw an exception when I ran it against a sharded collection. So my
question is a bit of a shot in the dark. I'll first note that the
Collap
Hi,
I am using suggester component in SOLR 5.5.1 and sort the matching
suggestion based on a custom field (lookupCount) field. The below
configuration seems to work fine but its returning the matching term even if
the weight is set to 0. Is there a way to restrict returning the matching
term based
The finish() method operates on the search node, not the aggregator node.
So whether it's distributed shouldn't effect how it runs. If you can post
your code I might be able to see the issue.
As far using a MergeStrategy, I would suggest creating a streaming
expression that handles the merge. This
Thank you very much Erick, I appreciate your feed back.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Using classic schema is perfectly acceptable/reasonable, you can
> continue to do so freely (you'll have to change to
> ClassicSchemaFactory though).
>
> Also, you can freely edit man
I believe the extensions are used for type guessing normally.
You could try explicitly specify files if they are in one directory
and you only have non-extension files. Or you could do a find|grep
-v|xargs -n command sequence to find whatever you need and feed it to
the post script.
Regards,
A
Erick - the UI you mention -- something that exists or something that has
to be built? (I'm upgrading to version 6 as well and this question is one
I'll have to deal with...)
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Rachid Bouacheria
wrote:
> Thank you very much Erick, I appreciate your feed back.
>
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
