Hi,
In short: backup on a recovering index should fail.
We are using the backup command "http:// ...
/replication?command=backup&location=/tmp" against one server of the
cluster.
Most of the time there is no issue with this command.
But in some particular case, the server can be in
Hi all,
I'm searching for ideas on how to define schema and how to perform queries
in this use case: we have to index books, each book is split into chapters
and chapters are split into pages (pages represent original page cutting in
printed version). We should show the result grouped by books and
Here's one idea.
Index each chapter as a parent document and then have individual pages to
be the child documents.
That way for a match in any chapter, you also get the individual pages as
documents for presentation.
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, 17:26 Zaccheo Bagnati, wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm searching for
That's fine. But how could I get, for example, obtain a list of the pages
containing a match?
Il giorno mar 1 mar 2016 alle ore 13:01 Binoy Dalal
ha scritto:
> Here's one idea.
> Index each chapter as a parent document and then have individual pages to
> be the child documents.
> That way for a
Just in case someone uses ScriptTransformer in DIH extensively
and is thinking about going from Java7 to Java8, some behavior
has changed due to change from Mozilla Rhino (Java7) to
Oracle Nashorn (Java8).
Took me a while to figure out why my DIH chrashed after changing to Java8.
A good help is
Thanks a lot for following up on this and creating the patch!
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8737 to handle this
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
> > 22. feb. 2016 kl. 11
To start, what is the form of your input data - is it already divided into
chapters and pages? Or... are you starting with raw PDF files?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:56 AM, Zaccheo Bagnati wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm searching for ideas on how to define schema and how to perform quer
Original data is quite well structured: it comes in XML with chapters and
tags to mark the original page breaks on the paper version. In this way we
have the possibility to restructure it almost as we want before creating
SOLR index.
Il giorno mar 1 mar 2016 alle ore 14:04 Jack Krupansky <
jack.kr
Any reason not to use the simplest structure - each page is one Solr
document with a book field, a chapter field, and a page text field? You can
then use grouping to group results by book (title text) or even chapter
(title text and/or number). Maybe initially group by book and then if the
user sel
Thank you, Jack for your answer.
There are 2 reasons:
1. the requirement is to show in the result list both books and chapters
grouped, so I would have to execute the query grouping by book, retrieve
first, let's say, 10 books (sorted by relevance) and then for each book
repeat the query grouping b
Hi,
I have solr 5.4.1 and I'm trying to use Block Join Query Parser for search
in children and return the parent.
I want to apply highlight on children but it's return empty.
My q parameter: "q={!parent which="is_parent:true"} normal_text:(account)"
highlight parameters:
"hl=true&hl.fl=normal_text&
On 2/29/2016 9:14 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Shawn, not sure if it's the same case as yours, but I've hit NPEs upgrading
> to 5.5 too. In my case though, SolrJ talks to a proxy servlets before the
> request gets routed to Solr, and that servlet didn't handle binary content
> stream well.
>
> I had to
Regex is working Markus. i need to investigate this particular pattern.
Thanks for you responses.
On 29 February 2016 at 19:16, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hmm, if you have some stemming algorithm on that field, [a-z]+works is
> never going to work but [a-z]+work should. If the field contains Juniper
Just keep in mind the regex operates on tokenized and filtered tokens if you
use solr.TextField. But on verbatim input in case of StringField.
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Anil
> Sent: Tuesday 1st March 2016 16:28
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr regex documena
You could index both pages and chapters, with a type field.
You could index by chapter with the page number as a payload for each token.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Zaccheo Bagnati wrote:
>
> Thank you,
Hi,
From the top of my head - probably does not solve problem completely,
but may trigger brainstorming: Index chapters and include page break
tokens. Use highlighting to return matches and make sure fragment size
is large enough to get page break token. In such scenario you should use
slop fo
Ah ok, in my case even 5.4.1 didn't work with binary request writer, so
probably we don't face the same issue.
Shai
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016, 17:07 Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/29/2016 9:14 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> > Shawn, not sure if it's the same case as yours, but I've hit NPEs
> upgrading
> > to 5
The chapter seems like the optimal unit for initial searches - just combine
the page text with a line break between them or index as a multivalued
field and set the position increment gap to be 1 so that phrases work.
You could have a separate collection for pages, with each page as a Solr
documen
On 3/1/2016 9:30 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Ah ok, in my case even 5.4.1 didn't work with binary request writer, so
> probably we don't face the same issue.
If I set the writer to binary on 5.4.1, it fails too.
My intent when I wrote the program was to use the binary writer, but
apparently I didn't
Hi all,
I'm struggling to understand Solr scoring but can understand why I get
those results:
[image: Inline image 1]
(If don't see pic:
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=f570232aa3&view=fimg&th=153332681af9c93f&attid=0.1&disp=emb&realattid=ii_153332681af9c93f&attbid=ANGjdJ-af_Q3b_h02w_TyMU
Your screenshot doesn't seem to carry over. We don't have the permission to
access files in your personal gmail.
But I might suggest pasting your Solr URL into Splainer: http://splainer.io.
Its a tool we use to explain Solr results.
I might further suggest this handy book :-p
https://www.manning.
Hello,
A few weeks ago, I submitted a pull request to Solr in association with a JIRA
ticket, and it was eventually merged.
More recently, I had an almost-trivial change I wanted to share, but on GitHub,
my Solr fork appeared to have changed upstreams. Was the whole Solr repo moved
and regener
I am looking for a solr solution of this model: Product (common fields) ->SKU
(color, size) and STORE(store_name) <-(price)-> SKU
Listing contains only products but other facets (store names, colors) and
sorting (by min price) should work either.
I can have 3 types of docs: products, skus and re
Supposedly Late April, early May. But don't hold me to it until I see copy
edits :) Of course looks like now you can read at least the full ebook in
MEAP form.
-Doug
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:57 PM, shamik wrote:
> Doug, do we've a date for the hard copy launch?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in
Doug, do we've a date for the hard copy launch?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/understand-scoring-tp4260837p4260860.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Just summarizing my questions if the long mail is a little intimidating:
1. Is there a best practice/automated tool for overcoming problems in
cluster state coming from zookeeper disconnections?
2. Creating a collection via core admin is discouraged, is it true also for
core.properties discover
I’ve been running SolrCloud clusters in various versions for a few years here,
and I can only think of two or three cases that the ZK-stored cluster state was
broken in a way that I had to manually intervene by hand-editing the contents
of ZK. I think I’ve seen Solr fixes go by for those cases,
We have a huge backlog of stale wiki.apache.org pages which should really just
point to the refGuide.
I replaced the eDisMax and DisMax pages with a simple link to the ref guide,
since they do not provide any added value.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Thanks for reporting!
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 1. mar. 2016 kl. 13.31 skrev Bjørn Hjelle :
>
> Thanks a lot for following up on this and creating the patch!
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
>> Created https://issues.
Hi,
Yes, the GitHub repo changed when we switched from svn to git, and you did the
right thing. Please see
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/news.html#8-february-2016-apache-lucenesolr-development-moves-to-git
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 1. mar. 201
Here is an - untested - possible approach. I might be missing
something by combining these things in too many layers, but.
1) Have chapter as parent documents and pages as children within that.
Block index them together.
2) On pages, include page text (probably not stored) as one field.
Also i
31 matches
Mail list logo
