Find attached the relevant part of the batch-update:
...
SolrClient solrClient = getSolrClient( coreName, true );
Collection batch = new ArrayList();
while ( elements.hasNext() )
{
IIndexableElement elem = elements.next();
SolrInputDocument doc = createSolrDocForElement( elem, provider, locale
Hello,
There was a discussion on this thread about exact match
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user%40lucene.apache.org/msg118115.html
they mention an example on this page
https://github.com/cominvent/exactmatch
Best regards,
Elisabeth
2016-02-19 18:01 GMT+01:00 Loïc Stéphan :
> Hello,
>
Well I got the numbers wrong, there are actually around 66000 fields on the
index. I have restructured the index and there are now around 1500 fiields.
This has resulted in the commit taking 34 seconds which is acceptable for my
usage however it is still significantly slower than the 4.10.2 comm
Hi
Did you get any Further with this?
I reproduced your situation with Solr 5.5.
Think the issue here is that when the SynonymFilter is created based on the
managed map, option “expand” is always set to “false”, while the default for
file-based synonym dictionary is “true”.
So with expand=fals
On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 11:48 +0530, Anil wrote:
> solr Documentation says docValues=true/false works for only few fields.
> will that work on Text field ?
No. It might at some point, but so far it is just a feature request:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8362
- Toke Eskildsen, State
q
Hi - we have quite some unit tests implementing AbstractFullDistribZkTestBase.
Since the upgrade to 5.4.1 we frequently see tests failing due to connection
reset problems. Is there an issue connected to this problem? Is there something
else i can do?
Thanks,
Markus
-Original message---
Hi,
we would like to display recent records on top.
two ways
1. boost by create time desc
2. sort create time by desc
i tried both, seems both looks good.
which one is better in terms of performance ?
i noticed, sort is good than boost in terms of performance.
Please correct me if I am wrong
Thank you.
it means to we need to create two fields of same content to support facet
and case insensitive , term search on a field. Agree?
Thanks again,.
Regards,
Anil
On 22 February 2016 at 16:07, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 11:48 +0530, Anil wrote:
> > solr Documentation s
Adam - how many documents you have in your index?
Thanks,
Susheel
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Adam Neal [Extranet]
wrote:
> Well I got the numbers wrong, there are actually around 66000 fields on
> the index. I have restructured the index and there are now around 1500
> fiields. This has r
Sorry, I see now you mentioned 56K docs which is pretty small.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Susheel Kumar
wrote:
> Adam - how many documents you have in your index?
>
> Thanks,
> Susheel
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Adam Neal [Extranet]
> wrote:
>
>> Well I got the numbers wrong, th
Yup, that's correct. Not talking massive amounts of data really. The commit
performance difference between 4.10.2 and 5.3.1 is huge in this case.
From: Susheel Kumar [susheel2...@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 February 2016 13:31
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subjec
> solrClient.add( documents ); // [2]
is of course:
solrClient.add( batch ); // [2]
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Clemens Wyss DEV [mailto:clemens...@mysign.ch]
Gesendet: Montag, 22. Februar 2016 09:55
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: AW: AW: OutOfMemory when batchupdating from S
Hi Anil,
Decision also depends on your usecase - if you are sure that there will
be no cases where documents matches are of different score or you don't
care about how well document match query (e.g. all queries will be
single term query) then sorting by time is way to go. But, if there is
cha
What are the types of the fields with the highest count? I assume
they are indexed. Are they stored, and do they have docValues?
-Yonik
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Adam Neal [Extranet] wrote:
> Well I got the numbers wrong, there are actually around 66000 fields on the
> index. I have r
On 2/22/2016 1:55 AM, Clemens Wyss DEV wrote:
> SolrClient solrClient = getSolrClient( coreName, true );
> Collection batch = new ArrayList();
> while ( elements.hasNext() )
> {
> IIndexableElement elem = elements.next();
> SolrInputDocument doc = createSolrDocForElement( elem, provider, locale
Highest count is fairly equal between string and text. They are not indexed but
stored and no docvalues used
From: Yonik Seeley [ysee...@gmail.com]
Sent: 22 February 2016 14:40
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Slow commits
What are the types o
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Adam Neal [Extranet] wrote:
> Highest count is fairly equal between string and text. They are not indexed
> but stored and no docvalues used
Ah, that's a big clue...
I wonder if it's related to stored fields compression. In Solr 5.5.
there is a way to tune comp
Is there an equivalent of the ESInputFormat (
https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch-hadoop/blob/03c056142a5ab7422b81bb1f519fd67a9581405f/mr/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/hadoop/mr/EsInputFormat.java)
in Solr or is there any work that is planned in this regard?
-Jamie
Thanks Emir
On Feb 22, 2016 7:31 PM, "Emir Arnautovic"
wrote:
> Hi Anil,
> Decision also depends on your usecase - if you are sure that there will be
> no cases where documents matches are of different score or you don't care
> about how well document match query (e.g. all queries will be single
I have also tried it with the fields just indexed and not stored, the
performance is the same so I doubt it is related to stored field compression.
I can file a JIRA, unfortunately I wont be able to provide example files for
this system but I will try and reproduce it with some test data and inc
Anil wrote:
> it means to we need to create two fields of same content to support
> facet and case insensitive , term search on a field. Agree?
As things are now, yes.
- Toke Eskildsen
Hi Shawn,
important note ahead: I appreciate your help very much!
> it's too proprietary for public eyes
That's not the reason for not posting all the code. I just tried to extract the
"relevant parts" in order to prevent not seeing the forest for the trees.
And yes " addMultipleDocuments" ends
I am getting no live node exception i dont know why
In my schema define ro field such as
...
{
"responseHeader":{
"status":500,
"QTime":9,
"params":{
"q":"_id:(1 3 2)",
"indent":"true",
"fl":"ro",
"group.ngroups":"true",
Hi folks,
We use SOLR 5.2.1. We have ebooks stored in SOLR. The majority of the
fields do not change at all like content, author, publisher Only the
price field changes frequently.
We let the customers to make full text search so we indexed the content
filed. Due to the frequency of the price
Hi,
As a pure C user, without wishing to use Java, what's my best approach
for managing the SolrCloud environment?
I operate a FastCGI environment, so I have the persistence to cache the
state of the "cloud".
So far I see good utilisation of the collections API being my best bet?
Any other
Hi all,
I'm extracting some text from pdf. As result, some important words end with
spaces between characters. I know they are words but, don't know how to
make Solr detect and index them.
For example, I could have the word "Subtitle" that I want to detect,
written like "S u b t i t l e". If I woul
On 2/22/2016 1:40 PM, Robert Brown wrote:
> As a pure C user, without wishing to use Java, what's my best approach
> for managing the SolrCloud environment?
The most responsive client you would be able to write would use the C
binding for zookeeper, to keep track of clusterstate like
CloudSolrClie
Hey all,
I am using openstack sahara to launch a CDH 5.3 cluster. The
cluster has an internal network and each node has a floating IP attached to
it. Essentially it is sitting behind a router.
Here is my problem any http requests that coming from outside the internal
network it takes abo
Are you sure all your solr servers are up and listening?
If you're using zookeeper, check if zookeeper has your nodes listed in the
cluster state.
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, 00:45 Mugeesh Husain wrote:
> I am getting no live node exception i dont know why
>
> In my schema define ro field such as
>
>
Is there some set pattern to how these words occur or do they occur
randomly in the text, i.e., somewhere it'll be "subtitle" and somewhere "s
u b t i t l e"?
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, 05:01 Francisco Andrés Fernández
wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm extracting some text from pdf. As result, some important wor
This happens for fonts where Tika does not have font metrics. Open the document
in Adobe Reader, then use document info to find the list of fonts.
Then post this question to the Tika list.
Fix it in Tika, don’t patch it in Solr.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wund
Dear All,
Please help to provide input to design requirement sent in previous mail.
is there any way to search past months archive "lucene-solr-user mailing
list archives"?
is it possible to achieve below solution to merge result from Solr and
mysql? How to search if one field exist in solr and
I downloaded the latest version of SOLR (5.5.0) and also installed zookeeper
on port 2181,2182,2183 and its running fine.
Now when I try to start the SOLR instance using the below command its just
showing help content rather than executing the command.
bin/solr start -e cloud -z localhost:2181,l
Hi,
solr servers are up and listening. and i also check zookeeper
clustersterstate.json as below
get /clusterstate.json
{}
cZxid = 0x10013
ctime = Fri Jan 15 01:40:37 IST 2016
mZxid = 0x11799
mtime = Fri Feb 19 18:59:37 IST 2016
pZxid = 0x10013
cversion = 0
dataVersion = 58
aclVersion
Ok when I run the below command it looks like its ignoring the double quotes.
solr start -c -z "localhost:2181,localhost:2182,localhost:2183" -e cloud
This interactive session will help you launch a SolrCloud cluster on your
local
workstation.
To begin, how many Solr nodes would you like to run
In the cloud section in the admin console, do you see all your shards in a
live state?
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, 10:25 Mugeesh Husain wrote:
> Hi,
> solr servers are up and listening. and i also check zookeeper
> clustersterstate.json as below
>
> get /clusterstate.json
> {}
> cZxid = 0x10013
>
Hi,
I am on solr 4.8.1 and running master-slave setup with lots of cores (>3K).
Internally I maintain an instance of HTTPSolrServer for each core that is
reused for querying the respective cores. A request is received by an
intermediary tomcat and forwarded to another tomcat running Solr.
Over th
Environment: Centos 6
Solr version: 5.2.1
Java Version: 7
Adding rules to collection creation did not work because solr does not return
the correct value for freedisk
Example:
http://server2:18983/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE&rule=replica:*,shard:*,freedisk:%3E24&name=search_create_tes
Hi,
We have a use case where we want to influence the score of the documents based
on the document type, and I am a bit unsure what is the best way to achieve
this. In essence we have about 100.000 documents, of about 15 different
document types. And we more or less want to tweak the score diff
Hi,
We are using Solr 4.6.1 in our application and have written some custom
plugins/components at many places. We are facing a issue and needed your
views for debugging the same.
Issue: After application starts up, after sometime, we see multiple
searchers
opened for the same core ( we have seen
I side with Toke on this. Enterprise bare metal machines often have
hundreds of gigs of memory and tens of CPU cores -- you would have to fit
multiple instances in a machine to make use of them to circumvent huge
heaps.
If this is not a common case now, it could well be in the future the way
hardw
42 matches
Mail list logo
