Hi!
Thank you for your super fast answer.
I can provide more data, the question is which data :-)
These are the config parameters solr runs with:
https://gist.github.com/bjoernhaeuser/24e7080b9ff2a8785740 (taken from
the admin ui)
These are the log files:
https://gist.github.com/bjoernhaeuser/
Hi,
My problem is that I got a an old 3-year project without knowing whether it
worked
I passed the stage of understanding and I managed to make it work. At the
beginning I think about why 6 files
I'm in a new stage which is optimization.
I have 6-import data files and am currently forced to launch
So I can run a script containing a fixed time for each file. It is a
solution. is that good and only solution?
My solrConfig.xml file, I declare a data-import files for 6.
can i group in the same data-import?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Many-files-dataIm
Hello,
In context to the question I asked on Solr confluence (I have copied the
conversation at the end of this mail).
I have indexed various videos in solr which I have in my database. I want
to search for those video titles, but there can be duplicate video titles
as well (If the video is same
Looking at the code, this is not going to work without modifications to
Solr (or at least a custom component).
The atomic update code is closely embedded into the Solr
DistributedUpdateProcessor, which expands the atomic update into a full
document and then posts it to the shards.
You need to do
TermsQuery works by pulling the postings lists for each term and OR-ing them
together to create a bitset, which is very memory-efficient but means that you
don't know at doc collection time which term has actually matched.
For your case you probably want to create a SpanOrQuery, and then iterate
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 14:53 +0530, vishal raut wrote:
> I have indexed various videos in solr which I have in my database. I want
> to search for those video titles, but there can be duplicate video titles
> as well (If the video is same but source is different, this will have
> separate entry in s
Hi everyone,
I need to install a plugin to extract Location (Country/State/City) from free
text documents - any professional advice?!? Does OpenNLP really does the job?
Is it English only? US only? Or does it cover worldwide places names?
Could someone help me with this job - installation, conf
I wonder what would happen if the DistributedUpdateProcessorFactory is
manually added into the chain and the LangDetect definition is moved
AFTER it. As per
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor#Distributed_Updates
This would mean that the detection code would be executed on each
nod
Actually, you are right. It would be executed on every node if you put
LandDetect after a deliberately inserted
DistrubutedUpdateProcessorFactory entry.
Not optimal, but would work.
Upayavira
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> I wonder what would happen if the Distr
Hello, All,
I can't find the way to change uniqueKey in "managed-schema" environment!!!
my steps:
1. Solr 5.3.1
/opt/solr/bin/solr start
/opt/solr/bin/solr create -c my_mail
2. added a few fields:
curl -X POST -H 'Content-type:application/json' --data-binary '{
"add-field":{"name":"sentDate"
A possibility: Define 6 different request handlers, something
like:
/home/username/data-config-1.xml
/home/username/data-config-2.xml
And fire off 6 separate commands, one to each end point.
WARNING! I have not tried this personally, so it might be an "
The GC logs don't really show anything interesting, there would
be 15+ second GC pauses. The Zookeeper log isn't actually very
interesting. As far as OOM errors, I was thinking of _solr_ logs.
As to why the cluster doesn't self-heal, a couple of things:
1> Once you hit an OOM, all bets are off. T
solr-user，妳好
With repsect to querying, Dismax makes solr query syntax quite like Google's,
you type simple keywords, you can boost them, you can use +/- just like
Google's. Meaning they give users a lot of covenince and less boolean knowlege
to establish intended query string. Normal Lucene sea
On 2 November 2015 at 22:38, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> On 2 November 2015 at 11:30, Gora Mohanty wrote:
>> As per my last
>> follow-up, there is currently no way to have DIH automatically pick up
>> different data-config files without manually editing the DIH
>> configuration each time.
>
>
On 3 November 2015 at 21:25, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> On 3 November 2015 at 10:38, Gora Mohanty wrote:
>>> I missed previous discussions, but the DIH config file is given in a
>>> query parameter. So, if there is a bunch of them on a file system, one
>>> could probably do
>>> find . - name
On 3 November 2015 at 10:38, Gora Mohanty wrote:
>> I missed previous discussions, but the DIH config file is given in a
>> query parameter. So, if there is a bunch of them on a file system, one
>> could probably do
>> find . - name "*.dihconf" | xargs curl .
>
> Sorry, I might be missing some
Hi,
thank you for your answer.
1> No OOM hit, the log does not contain any hind of that. Also solr
wasn't restarted automatically. But the gc log has some pauses which
are longer than 15 seconds.
2> So, if we need to recover a system we need to stop ingesting data into it?
3> The JVMs currently
One another item to look into is to increase the zookeeper timeout in
solr.xml of Solr. This would help with timeout caused by long GC pauses.
On 11/3/15 9:12 AM, Björn Häuser wrote:
Hi,
thank you for your answer.
1> No OOM hit, the log does not contain any hind of that. Also solr
wasn't rest
Hello Oleksandr,
It seems there is no way ManagedIndexSchema doesn't even refer to
IndexSchema.uniqueKeyField.
You may only choose the proper (with uniqueKeyField) config set when
creating collection.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Oleksandr Yermolenko wrote:
> Hello, All,
>
> I can't find the
I think edismax query parser perfectly fits for your needs.
You can make edismax search for query words on multiple fields using the
"qf" parameter and you can also set the priority of those searched fields.
Edismax also auto generates phrase query for specified fields . ( look into
the "pf" and "
Tried but still didn't get correct result. I guess the reason is because I
use block join with the document. My current solution is to use a name
tagged to extract persons then put name field restriction before it. This
will not work with all situations though. Thanks for the reply.
On Tuesday, No
Hi,
I'm looking to compile the SolrJ for Solr 4.10.3 for running on Java 6.
(Due to choices beyond my control, we are on this older version of SolrJ and
Java 6.) I'm looking for any pointers on how I could do it?
I tried downloading the source from SVN (for Solr 4.10.3, not the latest
version). I
You're on your one if you try to do this. Solr 4.10 requires Java7. I
don't believe Solr will even compile under 1.6.
You may bet lucky and get SolrJ to compile, but whether it works or
not is chancy at best.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:13 PM, O. Olson wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm looking to com
I think it was around 4.7 that the Java7 requirement was introduced. You
may find trying 4.6 will get you what you are needing. I'd expect the
artifacts in the Maven repo should be compiled with Java6 from that
point backwards.
Upayavira
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015, at 10:33 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Y
Thank you Erick. I'm sorry I did not clarify this in my original message.
I'm compiling Solr (or SolrJ) under Java 7. I'm aware that it requires Java
7 to compile, and that's why I have not changed the "java.source" value in
the common-build.xml file. SolrJ compiles fine. My problem is that I wou
On 11/3/2015 3:33 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> You're on your one if you try to do this. Solr 4.10 requires Java7. I
> don't believe Solr will even compile under 1.6.
>
> You may bet lucky and get SolrJ to compile, but whether it works or
> not is chancy at best.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Nov 3,
Erick Erickson wrote
> Have you considered using SolrJ instead of DIH? I've seen
> situations where that can make a difference for things like
> caching small tables at the start of a run, see:
>
> searchhub.org/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
Nice write-up. I think we're going to move to that ev
Damm. I always thought cross compilation of Java worked (i.e. compile in one
version with the target of a previous version). I guess it worked in my code
because I did not use any of the new features.
Thank you very much Shawn. No, I'm not running SolrCloud, but I wanted to
use the new features
Hi Team,
I want to integrate spellcheck handler with default select handler.
Please guide me how can I achieve this.
I tried like
explicit
10
text
productname
default
on
true
5
true
30 matches
Mail list logo
