Thank you everyone for the useful comments and observations.
I’ll start using atomic updates in the way they’re intended to and, if I
don’t get the performance we need, I’ll try with a custom
RequestUpdateProcessor.
On 17/09/2015 20:08, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
You could probably do this
If cpu is just 50% and adding a shard does increase indexing throughput
then check for disk bottleneck.
On Sep 17, 2015 18:19, "Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo" wrote:
> Thank you everyone for your reply.
>
> > How many CPUs on that machine? How many other requests using the server?
>
> A) There's 8 CPU on t
The ReRankQuery re-ranks the Top N documents of the main query based on a
query. Rather then the CustomScoreQuery you may want to look at ReRanking
by a Function Query using the FunctionQParserPlugin. This would allow you
to directly control the ReRankScore for the top N documents.
Writing your ow
I am running a 3 node zookeeper ensemble on 3 machines dedicated to
SolrCloud 5.2.x
Inside the Solr Admin-UI I can check "live nodes", but how can I check if
all three zookeeper nodes are up?
I am asking since node2 has 25% CPU usage by zookeeper while beeing idle
and I wonder what the cause is.
Have you tried zkServer.sh status?
This will tell you whether zookeeper is running or not and whether it's
acting as a leader or follower.
Sameer.
On Friday, September 18, 2015, Merlin Morgenstern <
merlin.morgenst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am running a 3 node zookeeper ensemble on 3 machines de
Greetings,
Using an Index-based spell-checker, I get some results, but not what I'm
looking for. Using a File-based checker, I never get any results, but
no errors either. I've trimmed down my configuration to only use one
spell-checker and named it "default", but still empty results on my t
Greetings!
I cannot seem to configure the spell-checker to return results in XML
instead of JSON. I tried programmatically, as in ...
params.set("wt", "xml");
solr.query(params);
... and I tried through the solrconfig.xml. My problem here is that it
is not exactly clear (because I've seen
Hi,
Thank you Sanders for your quick reply,
I ty now to follow the steps
2015-09-17 19:37 GMT+00:00 Sanders, Marshall (AT - Atlanta) <
marshall.sand...@autotrader.com>:
> So the issue is that when it's stated that solr runs on jetty 9 what it
> really means is that it runs on 5% of jetty9 and t
Is there a way I can issue a regular query with q and then apply
functionQuery only on the top n documents of the result from q ?
Applying functionQuery on all documents will be very expensive in my case.
I am not able to find a way to "rerank" only top N documents using Function
Query.
--aj
On F
The syntax would be something like this:
q=hello+world&rq={!rerank reRankQuery=$rqq
reRankDocs=100}&rqq={!func}myFunc()
I'm not sure if there is a test case demonstrating this but it should work.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Ajinkya Kale wrote:
Additionally you may want to use the four letter commands like stat et.c.
using nc or telnet
http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.3.3/zookeeperAdmin.html
Thanks,
Susheel
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Sameer Maggon
wrote:
> Have you tried zkServer.sh status?
>
> This will tell you whether zo
Thank Joel!
This is exactly what I was looking for. I did not realize rerank was
extensible to your own Function Query. This is good.
--aj
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:00 PM Joel Bernstein wrote:
> The syntax would be something like this:
>
> q=hello+world&rq={!rerank reRankQuery=$rqq
> reRankDoc
A query that works fine in Solr 4.9.1 doesn't work in 5.2.1 with the
same schema. The field that I am grouping on does not have docValues.
I get this exception:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: unexpected docvalues type SORTED_SET
for field 'ip' (expected=SORTED). Use UninvertingReader or index
Greetings,
Whenever I try to build my spellcheck index
(params.set("spellcheck.build", true); or put a check in the
spellcheck.build box in the web interface) I get the following
stacktrace. Removing the write.lock file does no good. The message
comes right back anyway. I read in a post th
What URL are you posting to? Why do you want to use JSON or XML from
SolrJ, which is best using javabin anyway?
Get it right via a URL first, then try to port it over to SolrJ. Then,
look in the Solr logs and you'll see the params that were passed over to
Solr - maybe you'll see what's getting set
Thank you very much Sameer, Erick and Upayavira. I got the solr cloud
working !!! Hurray !!
Cheers
Ravi Kiran Bhaskar
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> and replicationFactor is the number of copies of your data, not the
> number of servers marked 'replica'. So as has been sai
OK, I understand now! To view the results before going much farther, I
simply did a "System.err.println(queryresponse);" which printed the
results in a JSON-like format. Instead, I need to use the methods of
the queryresponse object to view my output. Apparently, the
queryreponse.toString()
Greetings!
Using the browser interface to run a query on my indexed data,
specifying "q=logtext:*" gives me all 9800+ documents indexed -- as
expected. But if I specify something like "q=logtext:Sunday", then I
get zero results even though ~1000 documents contain the word Sunday.
So I'm puz
What's the debug info (debug=true) for that query? Did you by chance change
field types or query parser?
> On Sep 18, 2015, at 19:53, Mark Fenbers wrote:
>
> Greetings!
>
> Using the browser interface to run a query on my indexed data, specifying
> "q=logtext:*" gives me all 9800+ documents
On 9/18/2015 5:53 PM, Mark Fenbers wrote:
> Using the browser interface to run a query on my indexed data,
> specifying "q=logtext:*" gives me all 9800+ documents indexed -- as
> expected. But if I specify something like "q=logtext:Sunday", then I
> get zero results even though ~1000 documents con
Xin Cai gmail.com> writes:
>
> hi Everyone
> I am a complete noob when it comes to Solr and when I try to follow the
> tutorial and run Solr I get the error message
>
> "Waiting to see Solr listening on port 8983 [-] Still not seeing Solr
> listening on 8983 after 30 seconds!"
>
> I did some
Is there a way to do something like
q=hello+world&rq={!rerank reRankQuery=$rqq
reRankDocs=100}&rqq=sort={!func}myFunc() desc ?
or even as simple as
1.
http://localhost:8983/solr/0/select?q=edgengram:abc&wt=json&indent=true&debugQuery=true&rq={!rerank
reRankQuery=$rqq reRankDocs=20}&rqq
On 9/18/2015 8:33 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
The "field:*" syntax is something you should not get in the habit of
using. It is a wildcard search. What this does under the covers is
looks up all the possible terms in that field across the entire index,
and constructs a Lucene query that actually i
bq: There is no fieldType defined in my solrconfig.xml, unless you are
referring to this line:
Well, that's because you should be looking in schema.xml ;).
This line from your stacktrace file is very suspicious:
logtext:Wednesday
It _looks_ like your logtext file is perhaps a "string" type
Thanks. Okay have done what you suggest, I.e. removed the overwrite=true
which should default to solr's default value. I've also tried a re-index
and left it to run for a few days; so far so good, nothing indicating
duplicates, so as you say, could just be a bug in my code.
Will continue to monito
25 matches
Mail list logo
