To be strict about it, I'd say that TrieDateFields CANNOT be null, but
they CAN be excluded from the document.
You could then check whether or not a value exists for this field.
Upayavira
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015, at 02:55 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> TrieDateFields can be null. Actually, just not in
At lucene.apache.org/solr it says SOLR 5.3 is there, but when I click on
downloads it shows Solr 5.2.1... ??
"APACHE SOLR™ 5.3.0Solr is the popular, blazing-fast, open source
enterprise search platform built on Apache Lucene™."
--
Bill Bell
billnb...@gmail.com
cell 720-256-8076
thx i just need to call solr.commit
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-add-document-tp4224480p4224698.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
As far as I understand I cant use 2 uniquefield. i need db id and uuid
because i moving data from database to solr index entirely. And temporaly i
need it to be compatble with delta-import, but in future i will use new only
uuid .
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble
Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> However, I find that clustering is exceeding slow after I index this 1GB of
> data. It took almost 30 seconds to return the cluster results when I set it
> to cluster the top 1000 records, and still take more than 3 seconds when I
> set it to cluster the top 100 record
Now I set db id as unique field and uuid field,which should be generated
automatically as required. but when i add document i have an error that my
required uuid field is missing.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DIH-delta-import-pk-tp4224342p4224701.html
Sen
Solr-5.3 has been available for download from
http://mirror.catn.com/pub/apache/lucene/solr/5.3.0/
The redirection on the web site will probably be fixed before we get the
official announcement.
Arcadius.
On 23 August 2015 at 09:00, William Bell wrote:
> At lucene.apache.org/solr it says SOLR
Hi Edwin.
What you are doing here is "search" as Solr has separate components for
doing suggestions.
About dedup,
- have a look at the manual
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/De-Duplication
- or simply do your dedup upfront before ingesting into Solr by assigning
the same "id"
Hello,
I want to run few Solr queries in parallel, which are being done in a
multi-threaded model now. I was wondering if there are any client libraries
to query Solr through a non-blocking I/O mechanism instead of a threaded
model. Has anyone attempted something like this?
Regards,
Ashish
Hi Erick and Upayavira, thanks for the reply.
I am using Solr 5.2.1 and using SolrJ 5.2.1 API with an annotated POJO
to update the index. And you were right, somehow my JODA DateTime field
was being filled with the current timestamp prior to the update.
Thanks for the clarification again.
On
Send the SQL and Schema.xml. Also logs. Does it complain about _id_ or you
field in schema?
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:55 AM, CrazyDiamond wrote:
> Now I set db id as unique field and uuid field,which should be generated
> automatically as required. but when i add document i have an error tha
Hello again,
I am doing some manual indexing using Solr Admin UI to be exactly sure
how TrieDateFields and null values work. When I remove the TrieDateField
from the document, I get the following when trying to index it:
| "msg": "Invalid Date String:'NULL'",
"code": 400|
On Solr 5.
On 8/22/2015 10:28 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Yes, I've increased the heap size to 4GB already, and I'm using a machine
> with 32GB RAM.
>
> Is it recommended to further increase the heap size to like 8GB or 16GB?
Probably not, but I know nothing about your data. How many So
Hi Shawn and Toke,
I only have 520 docs in my data, but each of the documents is quite big in
size, In the Solr, it is using 221MB. So when i set to read from the top
1000 rows, it should just be reading all the 520 docs that are indexed?
Regards,
Edwin
On 23 August 2015 at 22:52, Shawn Heisey
Indeed, I don't understand the caveat too, but I can imagine that is related
with some algorithm to trigger a full sync if necessary.
I will waiting for 5.3 to do the upgrade and have this configuration available.
—/Yago Riveiro
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/
On 8/23/2015 8:29 AM, Henrique O. Santos wrote:
> I am doing some manual indexing using Solr Admin UI to be exactly sure
> how TrieDateFields and null values work. When I remove the TrieDateField
> from the document, I get the following when trying to index it:
>
> | "msg": "Invalid Date Strin
Following up on Shawn's comment, this can be the
result of some sort of serialization or, if you're pulling
info from a DB the literal string NULL may be
returned from the DB.
Solr really has no concept of a distinct value of NULL
for a field, in Solr/Lucene terms that's just the total
absence of
On 8/23/2015 7:46 AM, Ashish Mukherjee wrote:
> I want to run few Solr queries in parallel, which are being done in a
> multi-threaded model now. I was wondering if there are any client libraries
> to query Solr through a non-blocking I/O mechanism instead of a threaded
> model. Has anyone attempt
Are you by any chance doing store=true on the fields you want to search?
If so, you may want to switch to just index=true. Of course, they will
then not come back in the results, but do you really want to sling
huge content fields around.
The other option is to do lazyLoading=true and not request
The last time that I used the HTTPClient library, it was non-blocking. It
doesn’t try to read from the socket until you ask for data from the response
object. That allows parallel requests without threads.
Underneath, it has a pool of connections that can be reused. If the pool is
exhausted, it
You're confusing clustering with searching. Sure, Solr can index
and lots of data, but clustering is essentially finding ad-hoc
similarities between arbitrary documents. It must take each of
the documents in the result size you specify from your result
set and try to find commonalities.
For perf i
And be aware that I'm sure the more terms in your documents, the slower
clustering will be. So it isn't just the number of docs, the size of
them counts in this instance.
A simple test would be to build an index with just the first 1000 terms
of your clustering fields, and see if that makes a diff
unsubscribe
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Solr 5.2.1, and I've indexed about 1GB of data into Solr.
>
> However, I find that clustering is exceeding slow after I index this 1GB of
> data. It took almost 30 seconds to return the cluster results wh
Hello Ashish.
Therse is an unfinished work about this at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3383
Maybe you want to have a look and contribute?
Arcadius.
On 23 August 2015 at 17:02, Walter Underwood wrote:
> The last time that I used the HTTPClient library, it was non-blocking. It
> do
i don't use SQL now. i'm adding documents manually.
db_id_s
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DIH-delta-import-pk-tp4224342p4224762.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello Upayavira,
It's a long month ago! I just described this approach in
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2015/08/scoring-join-party-in-solr-53.html
Coming back to our discussion I think I miss {!func} which turn fieldname
into function query.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> Mik
We use 8gb to 10gb for those size indexes all the time.
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Aug 23, 2015, at 8:52 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
>> On 8/22/2015 10:28 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
>> Hi Shawn,
>>
>> Yes, I've increased the heap size to 4GB already, and I'm using a machine
>> with 32
Hi Arcadius,
Thank you for your reply.
So this means that the de-duplication has to be done during indexing time,
and not during query time?
Yes, currently I'm building on the "search" to be do my suggestion as I
faced some issues with the suggestions components in the Solr 5.1.0 version.
Will t
Yes, I'm using store=true.
However, this field needs to be stored as my program requires this field to
be returned during normal searching. I tried the lazyLoading=true, but it's
not working.
Will you do a copy field for the content, and not to set stored="true" for
that field. So that field wil
Hi Alexandre,
I've tried to use just index=true, and the speed is still the same and not
any faster. If I set to store=false, there's no results that came back with
the clustering. Is this due to the index are not stored, and the clustering
requires indexed that are stored?
I've also increase my
- Did you have the exact same data in both fields?
No the data is not same.
- Did your "real" query actually compute stats on the same field you had
: done your main term query on?
The query field is different and I missed to clearly put it. I will
accordingly modify the jira.
So the query can
Thanks, everyone. Arcadius, that ticket is interesting.
I was wondering if an implementation of SolrClient could be based on
HttpAsyncClient
instead of HttpSolrClient. Just a thought right now, which needs to be
explored deeper.
- Ashish
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Arcadius Ahouansou
wrote
Nobody knows or has the same issue?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-10-3-cached-grouping-results-but-Solr-5-2-1-don-t-why-tp4224396p4224812.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
we have a Solr 5.2.1 with 9 cores and one of them has 140M docs. Can you
please recommend tuning of those GC parameters? The performance is not a
issue, sometimes during peaks we have OOM and we use 50G of heap memory, the
server has 64G of ram.
GC_TUNE="-XX:NewRatio=3 \
-XX:SurvivorRatio=4 \
34 matches
Mail list logo
