You can use the server/scripts/cloud-scripts/zkcli.sh script (or the cmd
one) in server/scripts/cloud-scripts. Note, in older versions this is in
example/scripts/cloud-scripts.
I just used this command to get the file from zookeeper:
server/scripts/cloud-scripts/zkcli.sh -z localhost:9983 -cmd g
Hi we have a multiValued spatial RPT field. Each document has 0 or more
coordinate pairs attached to it. I derived the coordinate pairs from the
spatial facetting heatmap and i have the count that comes with it, to do so i
had to translate the heatmap grid to a list of coordinate pairs with the
Erick,
related that I noticed that a lot of times, a developer would need an
intermediate API that will proxy the Search UI requests to Solr.
Of course there are scenarios where is necessary to build this intermediate
API ( for example if you customise how the results must be processed after
Solr
I think there is no issue with query escaping. I am doing shard query to my
main solr server, and from inside the main solr server I am doing simple *:*
query to another solr server by using solrj. But most of the time I get
following error. Cannot parse '*:*': Encountered "" at line 1, column
1.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Vishnu Mishra wrote:
> I think there is no issue with query escaping. I am doing shard query to
> my
> main solr server, and from inside the main solr server I am doing simple
> *:*
> query to another solr server by using solrj. But most of the time I get
> fol
Hi,
We are comparing the performance of fq versus q for queries that are
actually filters and should not be cached.
In part of queries we see strange behavior where q performs 5-10x better
than fq. The question is why?
An example1:
q=maildate:{DATE1 to DATE2} COMPARED TO fq={!cache=false}mailda
Some clarification:
I would like to understand how solr processes fq (without cache) versus q
when sort and group are required.
From:
Esther Goldbraich/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
To:
solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc:
Arnon Yogev/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL, Shai Erera/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL
Date:
24/06/2015 02:29 PM
Subject:
On 6/24/2015 4:16 AM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
> related that I noticed that a lot of times, a developer would need an
> intermediate API that will proxy the Search UI requests to Solr.
>
> Of course there are scenarios where is necessary to build this intermediate
> API ( for example if you cu
On 6/24/2015 5:28 AM, Esther Goldbraich wrote:
> We are comparing the performance of fq versus q for queries that are
> actually filters and should not be cached.
> In part of queries we see strange behavior where q performs 5-10x better
> than fq. The question is why?
>
> An example1:
> q=maild
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7719
I will work on it as soon as I can, it is very simple.
Cheers
2015-05-06 13:38 GMT+01:00 Alessandro Benedetti
:
> Exactly Tomnaso ,
> I was referring to that !
>
> I wrote another mail in the dev mailing list, I will open a Jira Issue for
> that
I want to know what is impact to disable term vector to existing production
environment, I mean how new segments create and how old segments will merge
with new segments because before this term vector was enable.
I have one more question Is schema.xml file read during solr core optimization?
T
Hi All,
I built the Solr index with 14 M records.
I have > 20 G RAM in my local machine, and the Solr instance was started
with -Xms1024m -Xmx8196m
The following query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/db-mssql/select?q=*:*&fq=GatewayCode:(YYZ)&fq=DestCode:(CUN)&fq=Duration:(5
OR 6 OR 7 OR 8)&fq=Date
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 02:50 PM, sudeep kumar wrote:
> I want to know what is impact to disable term vector to existing
> production environment, I mean how new segments create and how old
> segments will merge with new segments because before this term vector was
> enable.
>
> I have one more
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 03:27 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 02:50 PM, sudeep kumar wrote:
> > I want to know what is impact to disable term vector to existing
> > production environment, I mean how new segments create and how old
> > segments will merge with new segments
as i understood that after merging with old segments which was generated with
term vectors=true this won't cause any trouble i.e. index corruption or
index mismatch. and new segments will be merge with old segments
irrespective we have disable the term feature or not. And we are fine with
this that
Thanks Shawn,
What's Solr equivalence to ConstantScoreQuery? I.e., what if you want to
run a query that does not score, but only filter. The rationale behind
using a non-cached 'fq' was just that.
Shai
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 6/24/2015 5:28 AM, Esther Goldbrai
> In part of queries we see strange behavior where q performs 5-10x better
> than fq. The question is why?
Are you sure that the query result cache is disabled ?
2015-06-24 13:28 GMT+02:00 Esther Goldbraich :
> Hi,
>
> We are comparing the performance of fq versus q for queries that are
> actuall
Yonik added syntax to request a constant score query in Solr with the ^=
operator.
For example: +color:blue^=1 text:shoes
See:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7218
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Thanks Shawn,
>
> What's Solr equivalence to Co
Hi
I am new and learning Solr-5.2.1. I am using windows without
servlet.(using post.jar)
i have manage to index some files and try searching on
http://localhost:8983/solr/test/browse
I have few question to ask.
1. Can i modify "browse" to show little bit of the content that i search?
ex)
Ah thanks. I see it was added in 5.1 - is there any other way prior to that
(like 4.7)?
if not, I guess the only option is to not use fq if we don't intend to
cache it, and on 5.1 use the ^= syntax.
Shai
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> Yonik added syntax to request a c
Hi,
can someone help me in this regard?
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Term-Vector-and-Optimization-tp4213647p4213732.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 08:41 PM, sudeepgarg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can someone help me in this regard?
What additional help do you need?
Upayavira
Are you wanting to do no scoring at all, or just have a portion of the
query not contribute to the score?
If you don't want scoring at all, just sort by another field. If you
don't have a field, I just tried "&sort=1 desc", and it worked! This
should, if I'm right, pull documents out of the index
I would like to ask that after merging with old segments which was generated
with term vectors=true this won't cause any trouble i.e. index corruption or
index mismatch. and new segments will be merge with old segments
irrespective we have disable the term feature or not.
And we are fine with thi
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 10:51 PM, sudeepgarg wrote:
> I would like to ask that after merging with old segments which was
> generated
> with term vectors=true this won't cause any trouble i.e. index corruption
> or
> index mismatch. and new segments will be merge with old segments
> irrespectiv
Just pulled and launched Solr 5.2.1
dropped multivalued child into see data below. Response is quite correct:
"id":"22", "COLOR_s":"Blue","SIZE_ss":["XL","XXL"]}]}]
http://localhost:8983/solr/solr/select?q={!parent+which%3Dtype_s%3Aparent}%2BCOLOR_s%3ABlue+%2BSIZE_ss%3AXL&fl=id%2C[child+parentFi
There's also a nifty plugin for IntelliJ that'll allow you to edit files on ZK
if you use that IDE.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> You can use the server/scripts/cloud-scripts/zkcli.sh script (or the cmd
> one) in server/scripts/cloud-scripts. Note, in older versions this is
See inline.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:49 PM, wrote:
> Hi
> I am new and learning Solr-5.2.1. I am using windows without
> servlet.(using post.jar)
> i have manage to index some files and try searching on
> http://localhost:8983/solr/test/browse
>
> I have few question to ask.
> 1. Can i modify "
Tell us a bit more about your test setup. 1 or 2 tests
don't mean much. For instance, if the fq query has to
load the low-level caches from disk then the q-only
query is run and doesn't that could skew the results.
Or if somehow you're hitting the queryResultCache. Or
Frankly I'd disable all m
Why is cache=false set for the filter?
Grouping uses a 2 pass algorithm by default, so that means that the
filter will need to be generated twice (I think) if caching is turned
off.
Also, when you try to use the "fq" version, what are you using for the
main query?
-Yonik
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at
Cache=false - cause the use-case requires distinct time ranges, no reuse.
When using fq: q is set to *:*.
Are there any alternatives for the grouping algorithm?
If not, is there a way to reuse filter results between 2 passes?
Thank you,
Esther
From:
Yonik Seeley
To:
"solr-user@lucene.apache.or
no way. it's SOLR-6096 aka SOLR-6700
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 9:16 AM, מאיה גלעד wrote:
> Hey
> Your example works on my cloud but my problem didn't resolve.
>
> I'be checked and found the following :
> 1. When a child is created with multivalues it can be queried correctly
> with the url you've
1GB is too small to start. Try starting the same on both:
-Xms8196m -Xmx8196m
We use 12GB for these on a similar sized index and it works good.
Send schema.xml and solrconfig.xml.
Try not to store fields as much as possible.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 8:08 AM, wwang525 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I b
33 matches
Mail list logo
