Hi,
What is the advantages of java programming with Solr over Solr
API?
I want to experiment with this issue , where exactly I should take a look ?
I want to try to fix this missing aggregation .
What class is responsible to that ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ignoring-bad-documents-during-index-tp4176947p4187587.html
Sent
Relatively frequently (about a once a month) we need to reindex the data, by
using DIH and copying the data from one index to another.
Because of the fact that we have a large index, it could take from 12 to 24
hours to complete. At the same time the old index is being queried by users.
Sometimes
Hello,
I have scenario where I want to create/use 2 collection into
same Solr named as collection1 and collection2. I want to use distributed
servers. Each collection has multiple shards. Each collection contains
different configurations(solrconfig.xml and schema.xml). How can I do?
In
Hi,
I want to remove all the parent docs having a specific child doc. Eg.
Employee1
Dept1
Dept2
Employee2
Dept2
Dept3
Query: Remove all employees which lie in Dept1
Response should be: Employee2 *only*
Problem: *NOT operator is
Hi Shawn,
I do not want to increase timeout as these errors are very few. Also current
timeout of 90 seconds is good enough. Is there a way to find why Solr is
getting timed-out ( at times ), could it be that Solr is busy doing other
activities like re-indexing, commits etc.
Additionally I al
On 20 February 2015 at 15:31, SolrUser1543 wrote:
>
> I want to experiment with this issue , where exactly I should take a look ?
> I want to try to fix this missing aggregation .
>
> What class is responsible to that ?
Are you indexing through SolrJ, DIH, or what?
Regards,
This question makes no sense. Do you mean embedded Solr vs Standalone?
Regards,
Alex
On 20 Feb 2015 3:30 am, "Nitin Solanki" wrote:
> Hi,
> What is the advantages of java programming with Solr over Solr
> API?
>
I mean embedded Solr .
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> This question makes no sense. Do you mean embedded Solr vs Standalone?
>
> Regards,
> Alex
> On 20 Feb 2015 3:30 am, "Nitin Solanki" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > What is the advantages of java programmi
How to get only the best collations whose hits are more and need to sort
them?
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Reitzel, Charles <
charles.reit...@tiaa-cref.org> wrote:
> Hi Nitin,
>
> I was trying many different options for a couple different queries. In
> fact, I have collations working ok no
On 2/20/2015 6:38 AM, Nitin Solanki wrote:
> I mean embedded Solr .
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
>
>> This question makes no sense. Do you mean embedded Solr vs Standalone?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alex
>> On 20 Feb 2015 3:30 am, "Nitin Solanki" wrote:
>>
>>>
On 2/20/2015 4:06 AM, Nitin Solanki wrote:
> I have scenario where I want to create/use 2 collection into
> same Solr named as collection1 and collection2. I want to use distributed
> servers. Each collection has multiple shards. Each collection contains
> different configurations(solrc
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Lokesh Chhaparwal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to remove all the parent docs having a specific child doc. Eg.
>
> Employee1
>
> Dept1
>
>
> Dept2
>
>
>
> Employee2
>
> Dept2
>
>
> Dept3
>
>
>
> Query: Re
I am sending a bulk of XML via http request.
The same way like indexing via " documents " in solr interface.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/ignoring-bad-documents-during-index-tp4176947p4187632.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble
from all the examples of what you've described, i'm fairly certain all you
really need is a TFIDF based Similarity where coord(), idf(), tf() and
queryNorm() return 1 allways, and you omitNorms from all fields.
Yeah, that's what I did in the very first iteration. It works only for
cases #1 and
Since you are getting these failures, the 90 second timeout is not “good
enough”. Try increasing it.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On Feb 20, 2015, at 5:22 AM, NareshJakher wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> I do not want to increase timeout as
At the layer right before you send that XML out, have it have a fallback
option on error where it sends each document one at a time if there's a
failure with the batch.
Michael Della Bitta
Senior Software Engineer
o: +1 646 532 3062
appinions inc.
“The Science of Influence Marketing”
18 East
Hello,
We don't want to use locktype=native (we are using NFS) or locktype=simple
(we mount a read-only snapshot of the index on our search servers and with
locktype=simple, Solr refuses to start up becaise it sees the lock file.)
However, we don't quite understand the warnings about using lockty
Hi,
We are trying to upgrade from Solr 4.6 to 4.10.3. When testing search 4.10.3
search results are not being returned, actually looks like only the first word
in a sentence is getting indexed.
Ex: inserting "This is a test message" only returns results when searching for
content:this*. search
On 2/20/2015 9:37 AM, Rishi Easwaran wrote:
> We are trying to upgrade from Solr 4.6 to 4.10.3. When testing search 4.10.3
> search results are not being returned, actually looks like only the first
> word in a sentence is getting indexed.
> Ex: inserting "This is a test message" only returns re
Yes, The analyzers and tokenizers were recompiled with new version of
solr/lucene and there were some errors, most of them were related to using
BytesRefBuilder, which i did.
Can you try these links.
ftp://zimbra.imladris.sk/src/HELIX-720.fbsd/ZimbraServer/src/java/com/zimbra/cs/index/ZimbraAna
: We are using Solr. We would not configure two different Solr instances to
: write to the same index. So why would a "normal" Solr set-up possibly end
: up having more than one process writing to the same index?
The risk here is that if you configure lockType=single, and then have some
uninte
> *q= - {!parent which=employee:*} department:Dept1 *-> it does not work with
block join query parser.
What do you mean?
What this query (no spaces, brackets) ?
q=-({!parent which=employee:*}department:Dept1)
returns in your case?
20.02.2015, 18:02, "Mikhail Khludnev" :
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015
Personally, I much prefer indexing from an independent SolrJ client
to using DIH when I have to take explicit control of errors & etc.
Here's an example:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/indexing-with-solrj/
In your example, you seem to be assuming that the Lucene IDs
(and here I'm assuming you're not
20 February 2015, Apache Solr™ 5.0.0 and Reference Guide for Solr 5.0
available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 5.0.0
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text
It's a little bit hard to get the overall context eg why do you live with
OOME as usual, what's the reasoning to pull from one index to another, and
what's added during this process.
Make sure that you are aware of
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#SolrEntityProcessor which
queries oth
My index has about 110 millions of documents. The index is split over several
shards.
May be the number it's not so big ,but each document is relatively large.
The reason to perform the reindex is something like adding a new fields , or
adding some update processor which can extract something fr
On 2/20/2015 2:57 PM, SolrUser1543 wrote:
> That's the reason that I want to run on predefined list of IDs.
> In this case I will able to restart from any point and to know about filed
> IDs.
You can include information on a URL parameter and then use that URL
parameter inside your dih config.
On 2/20/2015 3:46 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> If the URL parameter is "idlist" then you can use
> ${dih.request.idlist} in your SELECT statement.
I realized after I sent this that you are not using a database ... the
list would simply go in the query you send to the other server. I don't
know wheth
Thanks Hoss,
Protection from misconfiguration and/or starting separate solr instances
pointing to the same index dir I can understand.
The current documentation on the wiki and in the ref guide (along with just
enough understanding of Solr/Lucene indexing to be dangerous) left me
wondering if ma
Hi Shawn,
Also, the tokenizer we use is very similar to the following.
ftp://zimbra.imladris.sk/src/HELIX-720.fbsd/ZimbraServer/src/java/com/zimbra/cs/index/analysis/UniversalTokenizer.java
ftp://zimbra.imladris.sk/src/HELIX-720.fbsd/ZimbraServer/src/java/com/zimbra/cs/index/analysis/UniversalLexer
Hey guys, I put a rq in defaults but I can't figure out how to override it
with no rankquery. Looks like one option might be checking for empty
string before trying to use it in QueryComponent? I can work around it in
the prep method of an earlier searchcomponent for now.
Ryan
On 2/20/2015 4:24 PM, Rishi Easwaran wrote:
> Also, the tokenizer we use is very similar to the following.
> ftp://zimbra.imladris.sk/src/HELIX-720.fbsd/ZimbraServer/src/java/com/zimbra/cs/index/analysis/UniversalTokenizer.java
> ftp://zimbra.imladris.sk/src/HELIX-720.fbsd/ZimbraServer/src/java/com
Thanks Shawn..
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 2/20/2015 4:06 AM, Nitin Solanki wrote:
> > I have scenario where I want to create/use 2 collection into
> > same Solr named as collection1 and collection2. I want to use distributed
> > servers. Each collection
Ryan,
This looks like a good jira ticket to me.
Joel Bernstein
Search Engineer at Heliosearch
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Ryan Josal wrote:
> Hey guys, I put a rq in defaults but I can't figure out how to override it
> with no rankquery. Looks like one option might be checking for empty
Hi all,
I'm querying a recipe database in Solr. By using synonyms, I'm trying to
make my search a little smarter.
What I'm trying to do here, is that a search for pastry returns all lasagne,
penne & cannelloni recipes.
However a search for lasagne should only return lasagne recipes.
In my synon
36 matches
Mail list logo
