On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 22:55 +0100, Nishanth S wrote:
> Thanks guys for your inputs I would be looking at around 100 Tb of total
> index size with 5100 million documents [...]
That is a large corpus when coupled with your high indexing & QPS
requirements. Are the queries complex too? Will you be
Hello, i have a question what i have to use tokenizer or filter ?
I need separate 2 chanels. I wrote this here earlier, but realize it with
solr basic tools it is not probably possible. And i',m trying to write own
tool for this task.
I have this input HelloHelloHow are you ?Fine
and you're?
d
Can't you use solr.PatternTokenizerFactory for this task?
On Friday, January 9, 2015 1:48 PM, tomas.kalas wrote:
Hello, i have a question what i have to use tokenizer or filter ?
I need separate 2 chanels. I wrote this here earlier, but realize it with
solr basic tools it is not probably possib
Thanks. That solved my problem.
Y
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-return-child-documents-with-parent-tp4178081p4178378.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I'm used the same regex and it doesn't work unfortunately. Or should I
somehow change the regex? Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Tokenizer-or-Filter-tp4178346p4178389.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Consider an update processor - it can take any input, break it up any way
you want, and then output multiple field values.
You can even us the stateless script update processor to write the logic in
JavaScript.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:47 AM, tomas.kalas wrote:
> Hello, i hav
Dear All,
I use Apache-SOLR3.6, on Ubuntu (newbie user).
I have a big database named BigDB1 with 90M documents,
each document contains several fields (docid, title, author, date, etc...)
I received today from another source, abstract of some documents (there
are also the same docid field in thi
I have a requirement to spotlight certain results if the query text exactly
matches the title or see reference (indexed by me as alttitle_t).
What that means is that these matching results are shown above the
top-10/20 list with different CSS and fields. Its like feeling lucky on
google :)
I hav
Hello
i need to know how can i filter on solr pivot data.
For exampel we have a dealer which might have many cars in his lot and car
has photos, i need to find out a dealer which has cars which has no photos
so i have
dealer1 -> has 20 cars -> all of them has photos
dealer2 -> has 20 cars ->
For throughput with G1, get rid of the pause time goal (-XX:MaxGCPauseMillis),
so the GC can pause as long as it wants.
Beyond that, use a non-concurrent collector and make sure that everything is OK
with pauses that last a few seconds.
This is a pretty detailed paper about balancing throughput
bq: I don't want to modify my BigDB1 to update documents with abstract
because BigDB1 is always updated twice by week.
Why not? Solr/Lucene handle updating docs, if a doc in the index has
the same , the old doc is deleted and the new one takes its
place. So why not just put the new abstracts into
Hmm, I wonder if the RerankingQueryParser might help here?
See: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Query+Re-Ranking
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Dan Davis wrote:
> I have a requirement to spotlight certain results if the query text exactly
> matches the title or see
Why not just add an fq clause like &fq=-mappings_iphoto_exist:[* TO *]?
note the "-" sign.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Darniz wrote:
> Hello
>
> i need to know how can i filter on solr pivot data.
>
> For exampel we have a dealer which might have many cars in his lot and car
> has photo
Maybe I understand you badly but I thing that you could use grouping to
achieve such effect. If you could prepare two group queries one with exact
match and other, let's say, default than you will be able to extract
matches from grouping results. i.e (using default solr example collection)
http://
Chris,
- DirectSpellChecker has a setting for "minPrefix" which the techproducts
example sets to 1 (also the default). So it will never try to correct the
first character. I think this is both a performance optimization and is based
on the assumption that we rarely misspell the first characte
Anybody? Otherwise, I guess it is a JIRA to delete the unused field?
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://www.solr-start.com/
On 28 December 2014 at 13:16, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> I am looking at the collection1/techproducts schema and I can't figure
Dear Erick,
thank you for your answer.
My answers are below.
Le 09/01/2015 20:43, Erick Erickson a écrit :
bq: I don't want to modify my BigDB1 to update documents with abstract
because BigDB1 is always updated twice by week.
Why not? Solr/Lucene handle updating docs, if a doc in the index ha
Or a Jira to document it.
The basic idea is that if a normal leading wildcard is too slow, the user
can index a copy of their text fields using the text_rev type, which
indexes terms with their characters reversed and with a special marker.
Then the query parser detects a leading wildcard and that
Hi all,
I am experiencing a problem where Solr nodes go into recovery following an
update cycle.
Examination of the logs indicates that the recovery is initiated by the shard
master while processing regular update events, because the replica is
unreachable.
For example, the following is recor
On 1/9/2015 4:54 PM, Lindsay Martin wrote:
> I am experiencing a problem where Solr nodes go into recovery following an
> update cycle.
> For background, here are some details about our configuration:
> * Solr 4.10.2 (problem also observed with Solr 4.6.1)
> * 12 shards with 2 nodes per shard
>
On 1/1/2015 12:10 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> I've been working with Oracle employees to find better GC tuning
> options. The results are good enough to share with the community:
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ShawnHeisey#GC_Tuning
>
> With the latest Java 7 or Java 8 version, and a couple of tu
It looks like 32 bit is affected.
> On 2013-08-14 08:27, Dawid Weiss wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I am a committer to the Lucene/Solr project. We've recently hit what
>> we believe is a JIT/GC bug -- it manifests itself only when G1GC is
>> used, on a 32-bit VM:
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 7:10 PM,
So, Query Parser does some sort of magic and looks for the field with
the same name and _rev suffix?
But what populates that field? In the example schema, it seems to be
standalone and empty. Is there a copyField missing?
Regards,
Alex.
Sign up for my Solr resources newsletter at http://w
23 matches
Mail list logo
