On 8/7/2014 12:34 AM, pushkar sawant wrote:
> I have done installation of Solarium Search on Magento 1.7 ver. my Solr
> 4.9 is also working in background.
> My Base OS is Ubuntu 13.10 on which solr 4.9 is running.
> when i go & check the extension in magento admin it only shows Test
> Connection.
>
I have 2 solr nodes(solr1 and solr2) in a SolrCloud.
After some issue happened, solr2 are in recovering state. The peersync
cannot finish in about 15 min, so it turn to snappull.
But when it's doing snap pull, it always met this issue below. Meanwhile,
there are still update requests sent to this
Why does PeerSync take so much time? Are these two nodes in different data
centers or are they connected by a slow link?
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:41 PM, forest_soup wrote:
> I have 2 solr nodes(solr1 and solr2) in a SolrCloud.
> After some issue happened, solr2 are in recovering state. The pee
Thanks.
My env is 2 VM with good network condition. So not sure why it is happened.
We are trying to reproduce it. The peersync fail log is :
2014年7月25日 上午6:30:48
WARN
SnapPuller
Error in fetching packets
java.io.EOFException
at
org.apache.solr.common.util.FastInputStream.readFully(FastInp
I have opened one JIRA for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6333
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Cannot-finish-recovery-due-to-always-met-ReplicationHandler-SnapPull-failed-Unable-to-download-xxx-fy-tp4151611p4151631.html
Sent from the Solr - Us
I have 2 solr nodes(solr1 and solr2) in a SolrCloud.
After this issue happened, solr2 are in recovering state. And after it takes
long time to finish recovery, there is this issue again, and it turn to
recovery again. It happens again and again.
ERROR - 2014-08-04 21:12:27.917; org.apache.solr.c
Thank you very much. But why we should go for solr distributed with hadoop?
There is already solrCloud which is pretty applicable in the case of big
index. Is there any advantage for sending indexes over map reduce that
solrCloud can not provide?
Regards.
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Erick Eri
I am using an classic ASP 3.0 application and would like to implement SOLR
onto it. My database is SQL server and also it connects to AS/400 using
batch processing. Can someone suggest a starting point?
*RegardsSandeep*
Can you elaborate on how you plan to use SOLR in your project?
Parnab..
CSE, IIT Kharagpur
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Sandeep Bohra <
sandeep.bo...@3pillarglobal.com> wrote:
> I am using an classic ASP 3.0 application and would like to implement SOLR
> onto it. My database is SQL server
If SolrCloud meets your needs, without Hadoop, then
there's no real reason to introduce the added complexity.
There are a bunch of problems that do _not_ work
well with SolrCloud over non-Hadoop file systems. For
those problems, the combination of SolrCloud and Hadoop
make tackling them possible.
Alejandro,
You can use a sub-entity with a cache using DIH. This will solve the
"n+1-select" problem and make it run quickly. Unfortunately, the only built-in
cache implementation is in-memory so it doesn't scale. There is a fast,
disk-backed cache using bdb-je, which I use in production. S
Hello
I am using solr 4.6.1 with over 1000 collections and 8 nodes. Restarting of
nodes takes a long time (especially if we have indexing running against it)
. I want to see if disabling transaction logs can help with a better robust
restart. However I can't see any docs around disabling txn logs
It's not clear to me from any of the comments you've made in this thread
wether you've ever confirmed *exactly* what you are getting back from
solr, ignoring the PHP completley. (ie: you refer to "UTF-8 for all of the
web pages" suggesting you are only looking at some web application which
is
Hi Nitin,
To answer your question first, yes, you can disable the transaction log by
commenting/removing the part of the solrconfig.xml.
At the same time, I'd highly recommend not disabling transaction logs. They
are needed for NRT, peer sync, high availability/disaster recovery parts of
SolrCl
Solr Rev: 4.6 Lucidworks: 2.6.3
This is sort of a repeat question, sorry.
In the solrconfig.xml, will changing the value for the comparatorClass affect
the sort of suggestions returned?
This is my spellcheck component:
Dear Erick,
Could you please name those problems that SolrCloud can not tackle them
alone? Maybe I need solrCloud+ Hadoop and I am not aware of that yet.
Regards.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> If SolrCloud meets your needs, without Hadoop, then
> there's no real reason
Corey,
Looking more carefully at your responses than I did last time I answered this
question, it looks like every correction is 2 edits in this example.
unie > unity (e>t , insert y)
unie > unger (i>g , insert r)
unie > unick (e>c , insert k)
unie > united (delete t , insert d)
unie > unique
Solr 4.1, in SolrCloud mode. 3 nodes configured, Running in Tomcat 7 w/
Java 7.
I have a few cores set up, let's just call them A, B, C and D. They have
some uniquely named xslt files, but they all have a "rss.xsl" file.
Sometimes, on just 1 of the nodes, if I do a query for something in A and
On 8/7/2014 1:46 PM, Christopher Gross wrote:
> Solr 4.1, in SolrCloud mode. 3 nodes configured, Running in Tomcat 7 w/
> Java 7.
>
> I have a few cores set up, let's just call them A, B, C and D. They have
> some uniquely named xslt files, but they all have a "rss.xsl" file.
>
> Sometimes, on j
Hi Paul,
There are lots of people/companies using SPM for Solr/SolrCloud and I don't
recall anyone saying SPM agent collecting metrics via JMX had a negative
impact on Solr performance. That said, some people really dislike JMX and
some open source projects choose to expose metrics via custom sta
useful.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Anybody-uses-Solr-JMX-tp4134598p4151820.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
mark.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-sync-lib-directory-in-SolrCloud-tp4150405p4151821.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
code error by my colleague.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/why-solr-commit-with-serval-docs-tp4150583p4151822.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
23 matches
Mail list logo