Look at the SolrJ source code and doc.
JavaBin is more of a protocol than a file format.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2014 2:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: How can I convert xml message for updating a Solr index to a
help me
-
Lady Cute
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-sort-solr-results-by-foreign-id-field-tp4133263p4133345.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hey Naresh,
few things that may be wrong
1) your application is not pointed to correct solr(change config.ini)
2)not able to access new solr machine from your application
environment(just run this command in terminal to know the status of the
port/IP from application environment telnet IP_ADDRESS
Thanks Shawn
In your opinion, what do you think is easier, writing the importer from
scratch or extending the DIH (for example: adding the state etc...)?
Yuval
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/24/2014 9:24 AM, Yuval Dotan wrote:
>
>> I want to use the DIH component
Hi Harish,
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6024 on behalf of you.
Ahmet
On Friday, April 4, 2014 3:13 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
Hi Harish,
I re-produced your problem with example/default setup.
I enabled doc values example fields. ( deleted the original ones) and indexed
Store the sort criteria in the documents you want to sort. Solr is
_not_ a RDBMS, trying to do SQL-like things is usually a mistake, the
usual approach is to de-normalize your data so you don't need to try.
Best
Erick
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 6:11 AM, Goosef_Le_Hung wrote:
> help me
>
>
>
> -
This might be helpful: http://searchhub.org/2012/02/14/indexing-with-solrj/
It combines using Tika for structured documents and using a JDBC
connector, but extracting the DB-specific stuff should be quite easy.
Best,
Erick
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Yuval Dotan wrote:
> Thanks Shawn
>
> I
Hi,
I have added SnowballPorterFilterFactory filter to field type to make
singular and plural search terms return same results.
So below queries (double quotes around search term) returning similar
results which is fine.
http://localhost:8080/solr/master/select?q=page_title_t:"product*";
http:/
Hi,
Below query without wildcard search is returning results.
http://localhost:8080/solr/master/select?q=page_title_t:"an-138";
But below query with wildcard is not returning results
http://localhost:8080/solr/master/select?q=page_title_t:"an-13*";
Below query with wildcard search and no didgit
I'm trying to understand the facet counts I'm getting back from Solr
when the main query includes a term that restricts on a field that is
being faceted. After reading the docs on the wiki (both wikis) I'm
confused.
In my little test dataset, if I facet on "type" and use q=*:*, I get
facet c
>>So my question basically is: which restrictions are applied to the docset
from which (field) facets are computed?
Facets are generated based upon values found within the documents matching
your "q=" parameter and also all of your "fq=" parameters. Basically, if
you do an intersection of the docs
On 4/27/2014 6:30 PM, Trey Grainger wrote:
So my question basically is: which restrictions are applied to the docset
from which (field) facets are computed?
Facets are generated based upon values found within the documents matching
your "q=" parameter and also all of your "fq=" parameters. Basi
On 4/27/14 7:02 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
On 4/27/2014 6:30 PM, Trey Grainger wrote:
So my question basically is: which restrictions are applied to the
docset
from which (field) facets are computed?
Facets are generated based upon values found within the documents
matching
your "q=" paramet
So, way problem above ?
-
Lady Cute
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-sort-solr-results-by-foreign-id-field-tp4133263p4133408.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If you can throw money at the problem:
http://www.basistech.com/text-analytics/rosette/language-identifier/ .
Language Boundary Locator at the bottom of the page seems to be
part/all of your solution.
Otherwise, specifically for English and Arabic, you could play with
Unicode ranges to try detecti
No problem, Mike. Glad you got it sorted out.
Trey Grainger
Co-author, Solr in Action
Director of Engineering, Search & Analytics @ CareerBuilder
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Michael Sokolov <
msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
> On 4/27/14 7:02 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
>> On 4/27/2
16 matches
Mail list logo