Hello
can someone please tell me how to make sure in solr to store date only till
minute level, since i am having issues with date range query performance. i
read in forums to reduce date precision so that the queries become faster.
As of now its storing date till seconds.
2014-03-11T07:00:00Z
i
Just to clarify when people mention rounding date till minute they mean to
store seconds as 00
hence there is nothing like storing date in below format, or am i wrong.
2014-03-11T07:00Z
Date are always stored in below format and by rounding people mean to store
seconds as 00 so taht there are few
Have you tried date math formulas? Don't need to round up what's stored,
just how you query and cache.
Regards,
Alex
On 06/04/2014 2:45 pm, "Darniz" wrote:
> Hello
>
> can someone please tell me how to make sure in solr to store date only till
> minute level, since i am having issues with
Actually I found why... I had and as lowercase word in my queries at the
checkbox does not seem to work in the admin UI.
adding lowercaseOperators=false made the queries work.
2014-04-04 18:10 GMT+02:00 Nils Kaiser :
> Hey,
>
> I am currently using solr to recognize songs and people from a list
Hi folks,
I’m already here and would love to join :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 05 Apr 2014, at 20:43, Doug Turnbull
wrote:
> I'll be there. I'd love to meet up. Let me know!
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone From: William Bell
> Sent: 4/5/2014 10:40 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
Hi,
I would re-run the corrected query client side. In my opinion, not all things
must be done inside solr.
Ahmet
On Sunday, April 6, 2014 1:00 AM, "simpleliving...@gmail.com"
wrote:
Yes, I saw that earlier in one of your other postings. Is it the case that we
cannot use the SpellChecker w
Is this an "XY" problem? You say:
bq: "...having issues with date range query performance"
What are you trying to do anyway? Add an "fq" clause?
facet by range? Details matter.
If you're using filter queries in conjunction with NOW, you might
be running into this:
http://searchhub.org/2012/02/
On the second thought,
If you are already managing to pass the value using the request
parameters, what stops you from just having a servlet filter looking
for that parameter and assigning it directly to the MDC context?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current pr
Arhgh... It seems like Functions Queries (obviously) never throw an
exception.
I have to scratch my own which throws always.
Here is the proof that boost is lazy
https://gist.github.com/m-khl/10010541
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 12:54 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 4/5/2014 1:21 PM, Mikhail Khludne
i have the a fieldtype that uses ngramfilter whle indexing. is there a
setting that can force the ngramfilter to index smaller words then the
minGramSize? Mine is set to 3 and the search wont find word that are only
1 or 2 chars long. i would like to not set minGramSize=1 because the
result
Hi Andreas;
I've implemented a similar feature into EdgeNgramFilter due to some Solr
users wants it. My patch is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5332 However if you read the
conversation below the issue you will realize that you can do it with
another way.
Thanks;
Furkan KAMACI
If indeed you do wish to round dates at index time, there is an update
request processor for that that is in my book (look up "round date" in the
index.) it lets you specify a unit of rounding, such as minute, hour, day,
month, year, etc.
It is actually a JavaScript script that uses the Solr s
I'm here as well, representing DataStax for Apache Cassandra and Solr.
The reception on Tuesday evening is for committers only, so that might be a
good time to meet up, maybe over dinner. Of course, I'm sure some of us will
run into each other at the main conference reception on Monday evening.
i thought i cound use max="2"/> to index and search words that are only 1 or 2 chars long. it
seems to work but i have to test it some more
On Sun, 06 Apr 2014 22:24:20 +0200, Andreas Owen
wrote:
i have the a fieldtype that uses ngramfilter whle indexing. is there a
setting that can for
Correction: My patch is at SOLR-5152
7 Nis 2014 01:05 tarihinde "Andreas Owen" yazdı:
> i thought i cound use max="2"/> to index and search words that are only 1 or 2 chars long. it
> seems to work but i have to test it some more
>
>
> On Sun, 06 Apr 2014 22:24:20 +0200, Andreas Owen
> wrote:
>
I'm running solr 4.6.0 and am noticing that commitWithin doesn't seem to
work when I am using the /update/extract request handler. It looks like a
commit is happening from the logs, but the documents don't become available
for search until I do a commit manually. Could this be some type of
config
Hi,
I use this link to setup a solrcloud
http://myjeeva.com/solrcloud-cluster-single-collection-deployment.html And
i use 5 different machine to setup this cloud. I use Unique id.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch [via Lucene] <
ml-node+s472066n4129333...@n3.nabble.com> wrote
Tell me whether it is possible to use Solr XML Messages for indexing via update
extract hendler?
Tuesday AM like 8am might be a good time to meet up.
How about at Westin at Starbucks on the 1st floor?
I'll be there. Any takers?
Bill Bell
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> I'm here as well, representing DataStax for Apache Cassandra and Solr.
>
> The reception on Tue
Tuesday 8 AM sounds great.
Sent from my Windows Phone From: William Bell
Sent: 4/7/2014 12:29 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Anyone going to ApacheCon in Denver next week?
Tuesday AM like 8am might be a good time to meet up.
How about at Westin at Starbucks on the 1st floor?
I'l
20 matches
Mail list logo
