As you suggestedI have indexed 12million sample records in solr on hardware
of 8gb ram. Size of index is 3gb.
can i extrapolate this to predict actual size of index.?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-many-shards-required-to-search-data-tp4118715p4118753.ht
On 2/21/2014 1:39 AM, search engn dev wrote:
> As you suggestedI have indexed 12million sample records in solr on hardware
> of 8gb ram. Size of index is 3gb.
> can i extrapolate this to predict actual size of index.?
If the sizes of those records are about the same size as the records in
the syst
Thanks Alexey for giving some really good points.
Just to make sure I get it right
Are you suggesting
1. do facets on category first lets say I get 10 distinct category
2. do another query where q=search query and fq= facet category values
May be im missing something, however Im not sure how to
Hi, I am getting Error if any of the field in the xml file has & as value.
How can I fix this issue
FYI I changed & to & in the field but still has issues
e.g AT&T or AT&T
Above both gives error, DO I need to change something in the configuration.
Thanks
Ravi
I’ve been experimenting with SolrCloud configurations in AWS. One issue I’ve
been plagued with is that during indexing, occasionally a node decides it can’t
talk to ZK, and this disables updates in the pool. The node usually recovers
within a second or two. It’s possible this happens when I’m n
Ravi,
What's the error you're getting?
Thanks,
Greg
On Feb 21, 2014, at 11:08 AM, "EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI,
Automotive-Service-Solutions)" wrote:
> Hi, I am getting Error if any of the field in the xml file has & as value.
>
> How can I fix this issue
>
> FYI I changed & to & in the fie
I am getting something like
ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore [com.ctc.wstx.excwstxLazyEception]
com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxParsingException: Undeclared general entity "nbsp"
The filed content is " " or "&"
-Original Message-
From: Greg Walters [mailto:greg.walt...@answers.com]
Sent: Fri
: ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore [com.ctc.wstx.excwstxLazyEception]
: com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxParsingException: Undeclared general entity "nbsp"
"nbsp" is not a legal XML entity unless you have an enty declaration that
defines it.
it sounds like you don't have valid xml -- it sounds like you
On 2/21/2014 10:31 AM, EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI,
Automotive-Service-Solutions) wrote:
I am getting something like
ERROR org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore [com.ctc.wstx.excwstxLazyEception]
com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxParsingException: Undeclared general entity "nbsp"
The filed content is " " or "&"
Hi all,
we are using SolR 4.4.0 and planning to migrate to 4.6.1 very soon.
We are looking for a way to get results ordered in a certain way.
For example, we are doing query by ids this way : q=id=A OR id =C OR id=B and
we want the results to be sorted as A,C,B.
Is there a good way to do this
Hi Metin,
How many IDs are you supplying in a single query? You could probably
accomplish this easily with boosts if it were few.
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o: +1 646 532 3062
appinions inc.
"The Science of Influence Marketing"
18 East 41st Street
New York, NY 10017
t: @app
Thank you Michael,
this applies from 5 to about 60 contents.
We have already tried with boosts, but the results were not sorted well every
time.
Maybe our boost coefficients were not set properly, but I thought that there
will be a "correct" way to do this.
Metin OSMAN
Canal+ || DTD - VOD
01 7
If I want to search across cores, can I use (abuse?) the distributed
search?
My simple experiment seems to confirm this but I'd like to know if there is
any drawbacks other than those of distributed search listed here?
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearch#Distributed_Searching_Limitatio
Hello,
We have following hard commit setting in solrconfig.xml.
${solr.ulog.dir:}
${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:60}
10
true
Shouldn't we see DirectUpdateHandler2; start commit and DirectUpdateHandler2;
end_commit_flush message in our lo
: Shouldn't we see DirectUpdateHandler2; start commit and
: DirectUpdateHandler2; end_commit_flush message in our log at least every
: ten minutes? I understand that if we have more than 100K documents to
: commit, hard commit could happen earlier than 10 minutes. But we see
: hard commit spac
On 2/21/2014 2:15 PM, T. Kuro Kurosaka wrote:
If I want to search across cores, can I use (abuse?) the distributed
search?
My simple experiment seems to confirm this but I'd like to know if
there is
any drawbacks other than those of distributed search listed here?
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/D
On 2/21/2014 2:34 PM, Joshi, Shital wrote:
${solr.ulog.dir:}
${solr.autoCommit.maxTime:60}
10
true
Shouldn't we see DirectUpdateHandler2; start commit and DirectUpdateHandler2;
end_commit_flush message in our log at least e
Thanks for your answer.
We confirmed that it is not GC issue.
The auto warming query looks good too and queries before and after the long
running query comes back really quick. The only thing stands out is shard on
which query takes long time has couple million more documents than other
shar
It could be that your query is churning the page cache on that node
sometimes, so Solr pauses so the OS can drag those pages off of disk. Have
you tried profiling your iowait in top or iostat during these pauses?
(assuming you're using linux).
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o: +1 646
In solr 3.6, strictly using log files (catalina.out), how can I determine how
long a commit operation takes? I don’t see a QTime to help me out as in
optimize… No doubt, it’s staring me in the face but I can’t figure it out.
Thanks in advance,
Bill
On 2/21/2014 4:26 PM, William Tantzen wrote:
In solr 3.6, strictly using log files (catalina.out), how can I determine how
long a commit operation takes? I don’t see a QTime to help me out as in
optimize… No doubt, it’s staring me in the face but I can’t figure it out.
Here's a log entry fr
On 2/21/2014 5:15 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
Here's a log entry from Solr 4.6.1:
INFO - 2014-02-21 17:09:04.837;
org.apache.solr.update.processor.LogUpdateProcessor; [s1live]
webapp=/solr path=/update
params={waitSearcher=true&commit=true&wt=javabin&version=2&softCommit=true}
{commit=} 0 4698
Hello,
I am using edismax parser in my project.
I just wanted to confirm whether we can use dynamic fields with edismax or
not.
When I am using specific dynamic field in qf or pf parameter , it is
working.
But when iam using dynamic fields with *, like this:
explicit
1
23 matches
Mail list logo