I have this configuration for test servers (the order of the instance
start leads to this conf.) not for production.
Elodie
On 01/23/2014 04:35 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 12/11/2013 2:41 AM, Elodie Sannier wrote:
collection fr_blue:
- shard1 -> server-01 (replica1), server-01 (replica2)
- shar
Hi All,
In my application, I have the requirement which can be solved by
"ExtractingUpdateProcessor". May I know by when it would be released (jIRA
ticket: SOLR-1763) ?
Can you pls. tell me where I can get "ExtractingUpdateProcessor" code base
??
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene
Hi All,
I'm doing a research project on : Email Reputation Analysis and for this
project I'm planning to use Apache Solr, Tika and Mahout projects to
analyse, store and query reputation of emails and correspondents.
For indexing emails in Solr I'm going to use the MailEntityProcessor [1].
But I s
Hello Solr Users,
i'm trying to get Tika's "BinFileDataSource" to take the filenames
from a multivalue field (array) but I'm getting the following
exception:
Debug output from running dataimport (shortenend):
"query",
"<<< LONG SQL-QUERY >>>",
"time-taken",
Hi Bustaa,
Can you paste your data-config.xml?
Also, did you consider using ManifoldCF [1] to crawl/index your CMS? What CMS
are you using?
[1]
http://manifoldcf.apache.org/release/trunk/en_US/end-user-documentation.html#repositoryconnectiontypes
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 1:03 PM,
Hi,
We have a developement environment running trunk but have custom analyzers and
token filters built on 4.6.1. Now the constructors have changes somewhat and
stuff breaks. Here's a consumer trying to get a TokenStream from an Analyzer
object doing TokenStream stream = analyzer.tokenStream(nul
Thanks for you suggestions Ahmet.
We are using the Typo3 CMS (with custom extensions / db-schemas). We
are using Solarium to connect to the Solr instance.
The schema is pretty simple:
If I were starting from a solr distribution (ie not maven), I would
extract everything from the solr.war in WEB-INF/lib and WEB-INF/classes,
and put that on my classpath.
-Mike
On 01/28/2014 06:29 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
Thanks Mike,
Sounds like Maven approach worked, I haven't trie
Hi
According to solr documentation the solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory should not
do any tokenizing at all, but to me it seems to be splitting on whitespace
e.g. space.
For example i have the value "FE 009" stored in the index to the field
"number", and what i search for is the exact same string "FE
Hi,
we are using Apache Solr Cloud within a production environment. If the
maximum heap-space is reached the Solr access time slows down, because
of the working garbage collector for a small amount of time.
We use the following configuration:
- Apache Tomcat as webserver to run the Solr web
Sorry guys, please ignore this. It was not ready to be sent but got sent
mistakenly. Will send a proper one later on.
*Aleksander Akerø*
Systemkonsulent
Mobil: 944 89 054
E-post: aleksan...@gurusoft.no
*Gurusoft AS*
Telefon: 92 44 09 99
Østre Kullerød
www.gurusoft.no
2014-01-29 Aleksander Akerø
And then go back and also add servlets jar from examples/lib. And
maybe everything from dist/solrj-lib just because they are there, even
if they are duplicates to some (all?) of the above mentioned
libraries.
That's my point. A newbie would not know this. If there a script that
has all that on the
Well, while you are preparing that one, is there any reason you have
two analyzers and both are 'index' type? One would probably be query
type, no?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of na
Hi, I'll try properly this time.
According to solr documentation the solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory should not
do any tokenizing at all. Thus, if I understand this correctly, it should
only return exact matches given that this is the only analyzer defined in
the field type. Such as the following con
Hi ,
I think the misunderstanding you are having is about
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.LowerCaseTokenizerFactory
lowercase
factory.
You are correct about KeywordTokenizerFactory but lowercase factory : Creates
tokens by lowercasing all letters and dropping non
Thanks for the quick answer, but it doesn't help if I remove the lowercase
analyzer like so:
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
**
I still need to add quotes to the searchquery to get results. And the weird
thing is
update:
Guessing that this has nothing to do with the tokenizer. Tried to use the
string fieldtype as well, but still the same results. So this must have to
do with some other solr config.
What confuses me is that when I search "1005" which is another valid value
to search for, it works perfectly
If you change the analyzer for a Solr field, such as adding, removing, or
changing attributes of token filters, you must/should reindex all data (add
it to the index again to re-analyze it.) In your case, the data was indexed
as lower case, so after your changes a query with upper case would not
I think the whitespace might also be the issue. The query gets parsed
by standard component that splits it on space before passing
individual components into the field searches.
Try enabling autoGeneratePhraseQueries on the field (or field type)
and reindexing. See if that makes a difference.
Reg
Hi,
Is there a way to cluster groups of near by GPS in a Solr query(GPS
inside a quadrant), we have everything in place (location_rpt with
Spatial4J and JTS) and we have been using Solr spatial for a while with
GPS and Polygons in the map, just wondering if there is a way to return
a list of
Hello everybody,
we have a legacy solr installation in version 3.6.0.1. One of the indices
defines a field named "content" as a fulltext field where a product
description will reside. One of the records indexed contains the following
data (excerpt):
z. B. in der Serie 26KA.
I had the problem tha
What field type and analyzer/tokenizer are you using?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Michael Engelke
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 10:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Not finding part of fulltext field when word ends in dot
Hello everybody,
we
The fieldType definition is a tad on the longer side:
>If you removed the tlog and index and restart it should resync, or
something is really crazy.
It doesn't, or at least if it tries, it's somehow failing. I'd be ok with
the sync failing for some reason if the node wasn't also serving queries.
-Greg
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Mark Mille
You might want to add autoGeneratePhraseQueries="true" to your field type,
but I don't think that would cause a break when going from 3.6 to 4.x. The
default for that attribute changed in Solr 3.5. What release was your data
indexed using? There may have been some subtle word delimiter filter ch
What's in the logs of the node that won't recover on restart after clearing the
index and tlog
- Mark
On Jan 29, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Greg Preston wrote:
>> If you removed the tlog and index and restart it should resync, or
> something is really crazy.
>
> It doesn't, or at least if it tries,
I am currently using elevate.xml to elevate few documents based on some
search keywords. We have a requirement to ignore the elevate.xml and boost
the documents based on original scoring factors when a user is an
authenticated user.
Is it something that can be done by using SOLR parameters?
--
: search keywords. We have a requirement to ignore the elevate.xml and boost
: the documents based on original scoring factors when a user is an
: authenticated user.
:
: Is it something that can be done by using SOLR parameters?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/The+Query+Elevat
Thanks a lot, I'll try the autoGeneratePhraseQueries property and see how
that works.
Regarding the reindexing tip, it's a good tip but due to the my current "on
the fly" setup on the servers at work i basically have do build a project
with maven and deploy to tomcat, wherein the index lies, and I
I've attached the log of the downed node (truffle-solr-4).
This is the relevant log entry from the node it should replicate from
(truffle-solr-5):
[29 Jan 2014 19:31:29] [qtp1614415528-74] ERROR
(org.apache.solr.common.SolrException) -
org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: I was asked to wait on s
>
>...the differnce between that example and what you are doing here is that
>in that example, because both of nodes already had collection1 instance
>dirs, they expected to be part of collection1 when they joined the
>cluster.
>
And that, I think, is my misunderstanding. I had assumed that the l
Hi All,
Is there a way for faceting only on the resultset returned, rather
then all the indexed docs?
The response time for solr query with faceting switched on, takes
a lot of time to respond. I see that, it tends to get the distinct values
in the facet field and then give the
Hello this is my 1st post to you group I am in the process of setting up a
development environment using solr. We will require multiple cores managed by
multiple users in the following layout. I am running a fairly vanilla version
of 4.6
/home/camp/example/solr/solr.xml
/home/user1/solr/co
On Jan 29, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Sam Batschelet wrote:
> Hello this is my 1st post to you group I am in the process of setting up a
> development environment using solr. We will require multiple cores managed
> by multiple users in the following layout. I am running a fairly vanilla
> version of
Thanks Steve for the link.
It seems very easy to create `new fields` in the `schema` using the `POST
request`. But doest mean that I dont have to restart the `solr app`? Is so,
is this feature available in latest solr version (`v4.6`)?
2014-01-29 Alexandre Rafalovitch
> There is an example in t
I have found this link
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Managed+Schema+Definition+in+SolrConfig
.
I dont know if it's required to modify the schema (see the link), to make
it editable by the REST API. I wish that it doesnt clear all the fields
that I have added manually to the schem
: In my application, I have the requirement which can be solved by
: "ExtractingUpdateProcessor". May I know by when it would be released (jIRA
: ticket: SOLR-1763) ?
:
: Can you pls. tell me where I can get "ExtractingUpdateProcessor" code base
ExtractingUpdateProcessor does not currently exis
Hi Hakim,
You don’t have to restart the Solr app to make use of fields added through the
Schema REST API.
This feature was first available in Solr v4.4 and remains available in Solr
v4.6.
Steve
On Jan 29, 2014, at 7:11 PM, Hakim Benoudjit wrote:
> Thanks Steve for the link.
> It seems very
Hakim,
All the fields you have added manually to the schema will be kept when you
switch to using managed schema.
From the managed schema page on the Solr Reference Guide you linked to
(describing what happens after you add https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Managed+Schema+Definit
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Kuchekar wrote:
> company=Apple
Did you mean company:Apple ?
Otherwise, that could be the issue.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that kee
Yeah it's a typo... I meant company:Apple
Thanks
Nilesh
> On Jan 29, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Kuchekar wrote:
>> company=Apple
> Did you mean company:Apple ?
>
> Otherwise, that could be the issue.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
>
> Per
Hi All,
I think Oauth2 integration is a valid usecase for Solr when it comes to
importing data from user-accounts like email, social-networks, enterprise
stores etc.
Do you think Oauth2 integration in Solr will be an useful feature? If so I
would like to start working on this.
I feel this could al
Hi Guido,
Check this out: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialClustering
It captures some information on the subject.
What I really want to do is built-in heatmap-faceting but I have no time
right now.
~ David
On 1/29/14, 10:38 AM, "Guido Medina" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is there a way to cluster groups
Hello
Do you mean setting
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.mincount to 1 or
you want to facet only returned page (rows) instead of full resultset
(numFound) ?
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Nilesh Kuchekar
wrote:
> Yeah it's a typo... I meant company:Apple
>
> Thanks
> N
I'm not sure I got my problem across. If I understand the snippet of
documentation right, autoGeneratePhraseQueries only affects queries that
result in multiple tokens, which mine does not. The version also is
3.6.0.1, and we're not planning on upgrading to any 4.x version.
2014-01-29 Jack Krupan
45 matches
Mail list logo
