I thought about that but my concern/question was how. If I used the pow
function then I'm still boosting the bad categories by a small
amount..alternatively I could multiply by a negative number but does that
work as expected?
I haven't done much with negative boosting except for the sledgehammer
Hi,
I am currently run Solr with 10 cores. It works fine with me, until "I" try
to run update on too may cores (each core uses more than enough CPU and
memory so machine becomes really slow). I've googled around and tried to
find whether there is an option in SOLR to prevent to many simultaneous da
Hi there,
I'm not fully understand what kind of usage example that DocValues can be
used?
When I set field docValues=true, do i need to change anyhting in xml that I
sent to solr for indexing?
Please point me.
Thanks
Floyd
PS: I've googled and read lots of DocValues discussion but confused.
Hi Floyd,
DocValues are useful for sorting and faceting per example.
You don't need to change nothing in your xml's, the only thing that you need to
do is set the docValues=true in your field definition in the schema.
If you don't want use the default implementation (all loaded in the heap),
Hi Yago
Thanks for you reply. I once thought that DocValues feature is one for me
to store some extra values.
May I summarized that DocValues is a feature that "speed up" sorting and
faceting?
Floyd
2013/11/20 Yago Riveiro
> Hi Floyd,
>
> DocValues are useful for sorting and faceting per ex
You should understand the DocValues as feature that allow you to do sorting and
faceting without blow the heap.
They are not necessary faster than the traditional method, they are more memory
efficient and in huge indexes this is the main limitation.
This post resumes the docvalues feature an
What's about having a simple charfilter in the analyzer queue for
indexing *and* searching. e.g
replacement="™" />
or
mapping="mapping-specials.txt" />
Uwe
Am 19.11.2013 23:46, schrieb Developer:
I have a data coming in to SOLR as below.
X™ - Black
I need to store the HTML Entity (decimal)
Thanks Yago,
I've read this article
http://searchhub.org/2013/04/02/fun-with-docvalues-in-solr-4-2/
But I don't understand well.
I'll try to figure out the missing part. Thanks for helping.
Floyd
2013/11/20 Yago Riveiro
> You should understand the DocValues as feature that allow you to do
>
Hi
We had the same issue
as mentioned we added
-Djavax.net.ssl.keyStorePassword=changeit
but we also had to add
-Djavax.net.ssl.trustStorePassword=changeit
that did it for us
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Error-with-Solr-4-4-0-Glassfish-and-CentOS-6-2-tp40
No, it is not supported yet. We can't split to a remote node directly.
The best bet is trigger a new leader election by unloading the leader
node once all replicas are active.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:32 AM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to perform a shard split and stream dat
No, there is no synchronisation between data import handlers on
different cores. You will have to implement this sort of queuing logic
on your application's side.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Patrice Monroe Pustavrh
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am currently run Solr with 10 cores. It works fine with me,
&debug=query is your friend!
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Rafał Kuć wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Terms surrounded by " characters will be treated as phrase query. So,
> if your default query operator is OR, the attorney:(Roger Miller) will
> result in documents with first or second (or both) terms i
But I don't know whether it's worth worrying about. queryResultCache is
pretty small.
I think of it as a map where the key is the text of the query and the value
is an
int[queryWindowSize]. So bypassing the cache is probably not going to make
much
difference.
YMMV of course.
Best
Erick
On Wed,
I am runnig cron job for indexing and commiting documents for solr search.
Earlier everything was fine. But from some time it is deleting indexes from
index folder. Whenever I update any document or create any new document, it
gets indexed and commited and appear in search but after some hour later
Hi,
After successfully configured re-crawling script, I sometimes checked and
found on Solr Admin that "Optimized" status of my collection is not
optimized (slash icon).
Hence I did optimized steps manually.
How to make my crawling optimized automatically?
Should we restart Solr (I use Tomcat)
I cannot imagine that Solr suddenly starts deleting indexes without you
changing anything, although all things are possible. Sanity check:
do you have at least as much free space on your disk as the total size
of your index on disk?
Your query will delete everything from your index with an endtime
You probably shouldn't optimize at all. The default TieredMergePolicy
will eventually purge the deleted files' data, which is really what optimize
does. So despite its name, most of the time it's not really worth the
effort.
Take a look at your Solr admin page, the "overview" link for a core.
If t
You may be hitting a query parser bug/nuance, that a purely negative
sub-query needs to have a *:* added so that it is not purely negative.
So, replace:
AND -endtime:"1970-01-01T01:00:00Z"
with
AND (*:* -endtime:"1970-01-01T01:00:00Z")
Or, as Erick mentioned in his reply, you don't really no
Any analysis filtering affects the indexed value only, but the stored value
would be unchanged from the original input value. An update processor lets
you modify the original input value that will be stored.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Reh
Sent: Wednesday, November
Eric,
it's worth to mention that queries which sorts by field can potentially
blows filter cache
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#useFilterForSortedQuery here is the
hint might work out.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> But I don't know whether it's worth worrying
Hi Shawn,
It just slipped my mind to mention the details of my solr version. Good point
and thought from your side. Thanks for checking back my emails.
I am currently using SOLR4.3 but not SOLR CLOUD. WE have a technical
documentation site which keeps changing with some new files and some delet
Hi,
I am using solr 4.3 version. I am planning to use the docValues feature
introduced in solr 4.2. Although I see a significant improvement in facet
and group query , there is a degrade in group.facet and group.ngroups query.
Has anybody faced a similar issue? Any work arounds?
--
View this
Mikhail:
Interesting point! Thanks! I haven't looked at the implementation enough to
know, but it looks like these are unrelated? You'd have to happen to have a
fq clause you'd already submitted (and cached) for this to happen?
But like I said, I don't know the code. I didn't realize this even ha
Thanks Erick.
I will check that on next round.
---
wassalam,
[bayu]
/sent from Android phone/
On Nov 20, 2013 7:45 PM, "Erick Erickson" wrote:
> You probably shouldn't optimize at all. The default TieredMergePolicy
> will eventually purge the deleted files' data, which is really what
> optimize
Do you think this is something that is actually implementable? If so,
I'll open an issue.
One use-case where this may come in handy is when the disk space is
tight. If a shard is using > 50% of the disk space on some node X,
you can't really split that shard because the 2 new sub-shards will
not
Hi,
"Numeric DocValues Updates" functionality that came via
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5189 sounds very
valuable, while we wait for full/arbitrary field updates
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4258).
Would it make sense to add support for Numeric DocValues Updates
I have setup my highlight as follows:
true
name age address
However I don't want *name* be highlighted *but *included inside response:
"highlighting": {
Something_myid: {
name: "Something bla bla",
age: "Something age bla bla",
address: "Something age bla bla"
}
}
*or:*
Hi,
When full index replication is happening via SnapPuller, a temporary
"timestamped" index dir is created.
Questions:
1) Under normal circumstances could more than 1 timestamped index
directory ever be present?
2) Should there always be an the .../data/index directory present?
I'm asking becau
Here is an example from wiki:
Iterator iter = queryResponse.getResults().iterator();
while (iter.hasNext()) {
SolrDocument resultDoc = iter.next();
String content = (String) resultDoc.getFieldValue("content");
String id = (String) resultDoc.getFieldValue("id"); //id is the
+1 to add this support in Solr
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis.gospodne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Numeric DocValues Updates" functionality that came via
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5189 sounds very
> valuable, while we wait for full/arbitrary fie
I encountered this problem often when i restarted a solr instance before
replication was finished more than once.
I would then have multiple timestamped directories and the index directory.
However, the index.properties points to the active index directory.
The moment when the replication succeed
Hi Otis,
I think these are related problems but giving the ability to enforce a
majority quorum among the total replica set for a shard is not the
same as hinted handoff in the Cassandra sense. Cass's hinted handed
allows you to say it's ok to send the write somewhere and somehow
it'll make its wa
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 7:37 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
>
>Since you are faceting on a text field (is this correct?) you deal with a
>lot of unique values in it.
Yes, this is a text field and we experimented with reducing the index. As
I said in my original question th
Again, I'd like to know why this is wanted. It sounds like an X-Y, problem.
Storing Unicode characters as XML/HTML encoded character references is an
extremely bad idea.
wunder
On Nov 20, 2013, at 5:01 AM, "Jack Krupansky" wrote:
> Any analysis filtering affects the indexed value only, but th
In our experience (with SolrCloud), if you trigger a full replication (e.g.
new replica), you get the "timestamp" directory, it never renames back to
just "index". Since index.properties gives you the name of the real
directory, we had never considered that a problem/bug. Why bother with the
rena
Hi,
I am using Solr 4.5.1. and I am planning to use docValues attribute for a
string type. The values in that field change only once a day. I would like to
only group on that field. At the following link :-
http://searchhub.org/2013/04/02/fun-with-docvalues-in-solr-4-2/
it is mentioned that "F
There might be a JIRA issue out there about replication not cleaning up on all
fails - e.g. on startup or something - kind of rings a bell…if so, it will be
addressed eventually.
Otherwise, you might have two for a bit just due to multiple searchers being
around at once for a while or something
AFAICT, it's not an "extremely bad idea" - using SGML/HTML as a format for
storing text to be rendered. If you disagree - try explaining yourself.
But maybe TM should be encoded as "™". Ditto for other named SGML
entities.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood
Hi,
we implemented a Solr suggester (http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Suggester)
that uses a file based dictionary. We use the results of the suggester to
populate a dropdown field of a search field on a webpage.
Our dictionary (autosuggest.txt) contains:
foo
bar
Our suggester has the following behav
Dhanesh,
> I'm pretty sure that the coordinates are in the right position.
> "9.445890,76.540970" is in India, precisely in Kerala state :)
My suspicion was wright; you have all of your latitudes and longitudes in
the wrong position. Your example that I quote you on above is correct
("lat,lon"
Thanks Otis
We also thought about having multiple fields, but thought that having too
many fields will be an issue. I see threads about too many fields is an
issue for sort (we don't expect to sort on these), but look through the
archives.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.4720
At the Lucene level, I think it would require a directory
implementation which writes to a remote node directly. Otherwise, on
the solr side, we must move the leader itself to another node which
has enough disk space and then split the index.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
wrot
Perhaps this can help you make sense of the advantages...
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/DocValues
: Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:45:04 +0800
: From: Floyd Wu
: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Re: DocValues uasge and senarios?
Solr is using the UniqueKey you defined for your documents, that shouldn't be a
problem, since you can lookup the document from the list of documents in the
main response?
And there is actually a ticket, which would allow it to inline the highlight
response with DocTransfomers: https://issues.a
Hi - a quick question about a low(ish)-level usecase of SolrJ.
I am trying to set a custom HTTP Header on the request that SolrJ is
sending out to the Solr Server - and as far as I can tell - there isn't a
clear way of doing that.
HttpSolrServer.request crates the HttpGet request and sends it - but
Hi,
Quick question about the HttpSolrServer implementation - I would like to
extend some of the functionality of this class - but when I extend it - I'm
having issues with how extensible it is.
For example - some of the details are not visible externally - setters
exist for maxRetries and followRed
May be there is a way to do this but it doesn't make sense to return the same
search query as a suggestion (Search query is not a suggestion as it might
or might not be present in the index).
AFAIK you can use various look up algorithm to get the suggestion list and
they lookup the terms based on
Feel free to file a JIRA issue with the changes you think make sense.
- Mark
On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
> Hi,
> Quick question about the HttpSolrServer implementation - I would like to
> extend some of the functionality of this class - but when I extend it - I'm
> havin
Will do - thanks for the quick feedback.
Eugen.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Feel free to file a JIRA issue with the changes you think make sense.
>
> - Mark
>
> On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Quick question about the HttpSolrServer
On 11/20/2013 2:21 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
Quick question about the HttpSolrServer implementation - I would like to
extend some of the functionality of this class - but when I extend it - I'm
having issues with how extensible it is.
For example - some of the details are not visible externally
The reason I needed access to internal details of the class - and it's not
just these 2 fields (I used these just as a quick example) - was that I was
trying to extend the class and overload the request method. As soon as I
tried to do that, I noticed that I really couldn't easily do so - because
m
: The reason I needed access to internal details of the class - and it's not
: just these 2 fields (I used these just as a quick example) - was that I was
: trying to extend the class and overload the request method. As soon as I
: tried to do that, I noticed that I really couldn't easily do so -
On 11/20/2013 3:28 PM, Eugen Paraschiv wrote:
The reason I needed access to internal details of the class - and it's not
just these 2 fields (I used these just as a quick example) - was that I was
trying to extend the class and overload the request method. As soon as I
tried to do that, I noticed
First - I completely agree with keeping the moving parts to a minimum - but
I do think that's a case by case decision, and in this particular case - it
may just be worth opening up a little.
Then - adding in a custom HttpClient may work - but HttpHeaders are set on
a request (and may differ from on
I have implemented a search API that interacts with Solr. I don't retrieve
id field. Id field is a transformed version of name field and it helps to
make a quicker search on index. It would be nice to declare to Solr that I
have another field that is unique too and it would be nice to group
highlig
I am using spacial search feature in Solr (4.0) version.
When I try to extract the csv (using wt=csv option) using the edismax
parser, I dont get all the fields in the CSV output as specified in the fl
parameter. Only the schema fields are coming out in CSV and the score, the
custom fields like d
Hi All,
I am new to apache solr. Recently I could able to configure the solr with
tomcat successfully. And its working fine except the format of the search
results i.e., the format of the search results not displaying as like as
input document.
I am doing the below things
1. Indexi
I deploy a solrcloud with three instances of solr, which use conf/velocity by
default.
Now I want to add another velocity configuration folder conf/new_vel, but I
couldn't
make it work when I change element of request
handler of solrconfig.xml.
I have tried conf/new_vel, /var/solr/test/conf/new_v
58 matches
Mail list logo
