Yes.
I understood that from the result.
But how do I change that behaviour?
"Don't do any analysis on the field you are using for suggestion"
Please elaborate.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:48 PM, tamanjit.bin...@yahoo.co.in <
tamanjit.bin...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Don't do any analysis on the field
Hey Yonik
It installed the latest Solr (Solr 4.4) and started the jetty configured in the
example directory.
To the core collection1 I added three titles. a, b, ä
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update/json -H 'Content-type:application/json'
-d '[{"id" : "1", "title" : "a"},{"id" : "2", "titl
OK, that makes sense, but when solr when run dataimport identifies the new an
existing document with the same uniquekey that is being indexed,right?
Because when the same document exists on the source, it deletes it and creates
a new one. Instead of that, is not possible to discard the new docume
Hi,
This question could possibly be about rare idr facet counting - i.e. retrun
the facets counts with the least values.
I remember doing a patch for this years ago, but then it broke when some
UninvertedField facet optimization came in around ~3.5 time.
It's a neat idea though to have an option t
This is totally deprecated but maybe can be helpful if you want to re-sort
some documents
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1311
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Tweaking-boosts-for-more-search-results-variety-tp4088302p4089044.html
Sent from the Solr
Hi buddy,
I am having this problem that I cant even reach to what you did at first
step..
all I get is:
This is the schema:
Note: the data is correctly placed in the field as the query results shows.
However, the facet is not working.
Could you please share the schema of what you di
I have added it and it didnt work. Still returning different result to 1=C
and q=c
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : This is probably because your dictionary is made up of all lower case
> tokens,
> : but when you query the spell-checker similar analysis doesnt happen
I want to filter the auto complete results from my suggester Lets say I
have a book table
Table (Id Guid, BookName String, BookOwner id)
I want each user to get a list to autocomplete from its own books.
I want to add something like the
http://.../solr/vault/suggest?q=c&fq=BookOwner:3
This doe
Hi
@Peter This is actually the requirement. We have. For both sort options (index,
count) we would like to have the possibility to add the desc option.
Instead of this result
q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=image_text&facet.sort=index&rows=0
12
23
200/int>
We would like to a
Hi,
I am having a problem with multiValued field and Faceting
This is the schema:
all I get is:
Note: the data is correctly placed in the field as the query results shows.
However, the facet is not working.
Could anyone tell me how to achieve it?
Thanks a lot.
--
Regards,
Raheel Hasan
Hello!
Your field needs to be indexed in order for faceting to work.
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - ElasticSearch
> Hi,
> I am having a problem with multiValued field and Faceting
> This is the schema:
> required="false" omitTermFreqAndPositions="
wow, that did it... fantastic... Thanks a lot :)
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Rafał Kuć wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Your field needs to be indexed in order for faceting to work.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rafał Kuć
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - ElasticSearch
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I am
ok i am getting there now but if there are newlines involved the regex stops as
soon as it reaches a "\r\n" even if i try [\t\r\n.]* in the regex. I have to
get rid of the newlines. why isn't whitespaceTokenizerFactory the right element
for this?
On 10. Sep 2013, at 1:21 AM, Jack Krupansky wro
Hi Sandro,
Ah, ok, this is quite simple then - you should be able to sort these any
way you like in your client code since the facet data is all there.
On the server-side, you can look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1672 - please note this is an
old patch for 1.4, so this won't work
Hey Peter
To sort these on the client side is no problem. But we have a problem using
pivot facet queries. If we set the facet.limit=-1 the load can cause
OutOfMemoryExceptions on the server side.
Thanks again for the patch. I will keep an eye on it.
Sandro
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Hi,
I am facing the below issue where in Solr is not retrieving the indexed
word for some cases.
This happens whenever the indexed word has string " - " (quotes for
clarity) as substring i.e word prefix followed by a space which is followed
by '-' again followed by a space and followed by the res
Hi,
I use the new SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType field to store geo
coordinates (e.g. 14.021666,51.5433353 ). I can retrieve the coordinates
just find so I am sure they are indexed correctly.
However when I try to create facets from this field, solr returns
something which looks like a hash
Okay, I can repro the problem. Yes, in appears that the pattern replace char
filter does not default to multiline mode for pattern matching, so on
one line and on another line cannot be matched.
Now, whether that is by design or a bug or an option for enhancement is a
matter for some committ
I am querying using
http://...:8983/solr/vault/select?q="design test"&fl=PackageName
I get 3 result:
- design test
- design test 2013
- design test for jobs
Now when I query using q="test for jobs"
-> I get only "design test for jobs"
But when I query using q = 2013
http://...:8983/s
Hello,
I am using the solr version 4.4.0, when I'm using FunctionQuery with boolean fields, it
seems that the default field value is "true" for documents without a value in
the field.
The page http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery#field says "0 is returned for documents
without a value i
I just tried a simple test with the example data, and things seem to
be working fine...
I tried this:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select
?q=*:*
&rows=100
&fl=id, inStock, if(inStock,10,0)
I saw values of 10 when inStock==true and values of 0 when it was
missing or explicitly false.
Perhaps y
Hi,
I am trying to load data (as plaint text) from a URL. For this I am
using URLDataSource & PlainTextEntityProcesso. However, I have the
following not working. I checked access logs of my web server, the url is
not even getting called:
http://localhost/update_1/test.txt"
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 13:16 +0200, Sandro Zbinden wrote:
> Is there a plan to add support for alphabetical facet sorting with non
> ASCII Characters ?
Not to my knowledge. I discussed an idea a year ago about handling it
with modified ICUCollatorKeys, but that solution does not work well with
the
I didn't forget to commit my changes.
I used commands:
java -Durl=http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/update -jar post.jar
ipod_video.xml
curl 'http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/update/?commit=true'
When I use your url example
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=100&fl=id,inStock
On 9/10/2013 12:45 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> Upload changed config files to zookeeper, using the zookeeper cli, which
> I think is in example/cloud-scripts. Then use the collections api, over
> http, to reload the collection.
If you are on 4.3.1 or earlier, you'll need to restart Solr. There's a
bug
By the way Yonik which version do you use (4.4.0 or nightly) ?
Elodie
On 09/10/2013 04:06 PM, Elodie Sannier wrote:
I didn't forget to commit my changes.
I used commands:
java -Durl=http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/update -jar post.jar
ipod_video.xml
curl 'http://localhost:8983/solr/colle
You can use DB for storing user preferences and later if you want you can flush
them to solr as an update along with userid.
Or you may add a result pipeline filter
Rgds
AJ
On 13-Feb-2013, at 17:50, Á_o wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I am working on a proyect where we want to recommend our users pr
Any update? I am also having the same issue. pls reply.
This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with
it. The document tree is shown below.
0
7
db-data-config.xml
delta-import
idle
2
1
0
2013-09-10 07:46:34
2013-09-10 07:46:34
2013-09-10 07:46:35
2013-09-10 0
Thanks Erick for the response.
I tried to debug the query. Below is the response in the debug node
Rahul - kumarRahul
- kumar+text:Rahul -text:kumar+text:Rahul -text:kumarLuceneQParserRahul - kumar+text:rahul -text:kumar
Does it mean the query parser has parsed it to tokens "Rahul -" and "kumar"
What release of Solr are you using?
It appears that the hyphen is being treated as an exclusion operator even
though it is followed by a space. Solr 4.4 doesn't appear to do that, but
maybe earlier releases had a problem.
In any case, be careful with leading hyphen in queries since it does me
You might be able to facet by query, but faceting by
location fields doesn't make a huge amount of sense,
you'll have lots of facets on individual lat/lon points.
What is the use-case you are trying to support here?
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Christian Köhler - ZFMK
wrote:
>
I am using solr 4.3.1, during Delta-import, i am always getting "Total
Documents Processed" as 0 enenthough it is getting the changed documents.
And no error in the log. I tried with "dih" instead of "dataimporter", still
same issue. Any suggestions please?
---
0
7
db-data-config.x
Solved
On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:55 PM, Luís Portela Afonso wrote:
> It's that possible to execute queries on a javascript script on
> StatelessScriptUpdateProcessor.
> I'm processing data with a javascript i want to execute a query to the
> indexed data of solr.
>
> I know that the javascript scr
You can't facet on fields where indexed="false". When you look at
output docs, you're seeing _stored_ not indexed data. Set
indexed="true" and re-index...
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Rah1x wrote:
> Hi buddy,
>
> I am having this problem that I cant even reach to what you did a
Note that Solr facets on the *indexed* value, not the stored one. If you
want to facet on the points themselves, store them in your index
alongside as a 'string' field, and facet on that. But as Erick says,
that might give you rather a lot of facets, unless things tend to be
grouped by location.
U
Hi
What are the pros and cons of both use cases?
1. use nutch to crawl file system + parse files + perform other data
manipulation and eventually index to solr.
2. use solr dataimporthandlers and plugins in order to perform this task.
Note that I have tens of millions of docs which I need to ha
If you have tens of millions of documents to parse and do want to do that
job inside Solr than it means that you will make a workload on Solr. If
there are many queries into your Solr node than you should consider that
CPU and RAM may not be enough for you while both parsing and somebody is
queryin
Is your df parameter also set to PackageName? The fl parameter just sets the
fields to return, not which fields are queried.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mysurf Mail
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 9:25 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr doesnt return ans
Yes, Solr/Lucene works fine with other indexes this large. There are
many indexes with hundreds of gigabytes and hundreds of millions of
documents. My experience years ago was that at this scale, searching
worked great, sorting & facets less so, and the real problem was IT: a
200G blob of data
Your delta query i.e.
deltaQuery ="select distinct clai_idn as clai_idn from claim_history where
clai_idn=29">
always gets only one row with a fixed "clai_idn". So here you fetch the same
row. What you would want is to get all rows after a p
I am aware of this..my actual delta query is like below, to test the issue, i
restricted the delta query to one record earlier.
deltaQuery ="select distinct clai_idn as clai_idn from claim_history where
TO_CHAR(EVENT_DTE , '-MM-D
Removing stray hyphens (embedded hyphens, like "CD-ROM", are okay) or
escaping them with backslash looks like your best bests. There's no query
parser option to disable the hyphen as an exlusion operator, although an
upgrade to a "modern" Solr should fix the problem.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Or
I'm using Solr 3.4.
This bug is causing the 2nd term i.e. "kumar" to be treated as an exclusion
operator?
Is it possible to configure the query parser to not treat the '-' as
exclusion operator ?
If not the only way is to remove the '-' from the query string?
Thanks,
Prathik
On Tue, Sep 10, 20
On 9/10/2013 2:37 PM, Brent Ryan wrote:
Does anyone know why solr is not respecting keep-alive requests when using
apache bench?
ab -v 4 -H "Connection: Keep-Alive" -H "Keep-Alive: 3000" -k -c 10 -n 100 "
http://host1:8983/solr/test.solr/select?q=*%3A*&wt=xml&indent=true";
Response contains th
Hey guys,
Based on my understanding of the problem we are encountering, I feel we've
been able to reduce the likelihood of this issue by making the following
changes to our app's usage of SolrCloud:
1) We increased our document batch size to 200 from 10 - our app batches
updates to reduce HTTP re
It's that possible to execute queries on a javascript script on
StatelessScriptUpdateProcessor.
I'm processing data with a javascript i want to execute a query to the indexed
data of solr.
I know that the javascript script, has an instance of SolrQueryRequest and
SolrQueryResponse, but neither
: Does anyone know why solr is not respecting keep-alive requests when using
: apache bench?
I've seen this before from people trying to test with "ab", but never
fully understood it.
There is some combination of using ab (which uses HTTP/1.0 and the non-RFC
compliant HTTP/1.0 version of optio
Does anyone know why solr is not respecting keep-alive requests when using
apache bench?
ab -v 4 -H "Connection: Keep-Alive" -H "Keep-Alive: 3000" -k -c 10 -n 100 "
http://host1:8983/solr/test.solr/select?q=*%3A*&wt=xml&indent=true";
Response contains this and if you look at debug output you see
*sleep 1.5 seconds* command per file
...FWIW I found in trying to cfindex 35K documents that if I did a
cfdirectory list and added a delay per file indexed (and a cfsetting with a
REALLY long timeout), CPU use dropped from 58% to ~19% and I got much
farther without the dread maxWarmingSearchers=4 e
: Thanks for the response. My requirement is make sure I detect file if its
: already indexed , neglect instead of replacing the existing one.
A trivial way to make Solr reject (ie: actually generate an error, not
just ignore) a document that already exists is to use the Optimistic
Concurrency
: When I use your url example
:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*&rows=100&fl=id,inStock,if%28inStock,10,0%29&debugQuery=true
: I have :
: 10
: (and my document does not have the inStock field)
Elodie, this is definitely a tricy one...
I can reproduce the problme you are describing, on 4.
thanks guys. I saw this other post with curl and verified it working.
I've also used apache bench for a bunch of stuff and keep-alive works fine
with things like Java netty.io servers ... strange that tomcat isn't
respecting the http protocol or headers
There must be a bug in this version o
: I've also used apache bench for a bunch of stuff and keep-alive works fine
: with things like Java netty.io servers ... strange that tomcat isn't
: respecting the http protocol or headers
as i said, it's probably *very* specific to the combination of trying to
use a chunked response (beca
Chunked is HTTP/1.1 only, so that could be the problem. --wunder
On Sep 10, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : I've also used apache bench for a bunch of stuff and keep-alive works fine
> : with things like Java netty.io servers ... strange that tomcat isn't
> : respecting the htt
: Chunked is HTTP/1.1 only, so that could be the problem. --wunder
well ... yes and no.
the *request* ab sends are specified as http/1.0, and in that request
it uses the (non-RFC complieant but generally accepted) http/1.0 style
keep-alive headers.
jetty parses the http/1.0 request fine, bu
: Subject: "delta-import" giving Total Documents Processed = 0
: I am using solr 4.3.1, during Delta-import, i am always getting "Total
: Documents Processed" as 0 enenthough it is getting the changed documents.
: And no error in the log. I tried with "dih" instead of "dataimporter", still
: same
Perfect. This is exactly what we need!
I wish there is an option for plugin (or) if there is some feature like
this in mainstream Solr release.
Still this is a great resource for us. Thanks Marc for pointing to very
useful information.
Thanks all for the help.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM
Thank you Lance for you experience share. That will be useful to me.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr4-4-or-zookeeper-3-4-5-do-not-support-too-many-collections-more-than-600-tp4088689p4089212.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.c
Hi all
In which situations,one core will become down?And how can I simulate
these situations
Any suggestions will be appreatiated.
Regards
Yesterday, I just install latest version of Solr 4.4.0 on Glassfish and
CentOS 6.2 and got an error when try to access the administration page. I
have checked this version on Mac OS one month ago, it works well. So, please
help me clarify what problem.
[#|2013-09-10T18:31:36.433+|INFO|oracle-g
@Shawn: Correctly I am trying to reduce the index size. I am working on
reindex the solr with some of the features as indexed and not stored
@Jean: I tried with different caches. It did not show much improvement.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 9/6/2013 2:54 AM, prabu
61 matches
Mail list logo
