Hi guys,
Is it possible to determine (by the server node itself) in SolrCloud if the
node is the leader? One possible solution is to use CloudSolrServer and
fetch leader address but how can I check address of the current node (I can
see it in configuration but how to get configuration programmatic
Hello Solr-Community,
I am having some strange behavior that I don't understand. I hope you
can help. I try to query/search for two words. For example "(*foo* AND
*bar*)
What I want is to get all entries that contain the string foo AND
contain the word bar. What I get is all entries that contai
Hi,
Index size growing during optimize and then shrinking is expected, so
if you are not seeing growth with BB, maybe you are not really
optimizing it.
Start by looking at the logs. Any errors/exceptions there?
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/
Performance Monitoring -
Hi,
Does the same happen if you use +*foo* +*bar* syntax?
If such queries turn out to be too slow, consider indexing ngrams.
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/
Performance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Stavros Delisavas wrote
Please any help on how to pass the search request to different
RequestHandler from within the custom RequestHandler and how to debug the
custom RequestHandler plugin ?
Thanks,
Tony
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Tony Mullins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have defined my new Solr RequestHandler plugin li
Hi Ali, You are getting an error because of the number of rows you are trying to fetch. Solr will keep all results in its queue before submitting the results. Solution is to page thru your results (but be careful about deep paging). _Stephane On July 13, 2013 at 2:31:57 AM, Ali, Saqib (docbook@
Why do you think you need to know which node is "the leader"? Answer: You
don't - SolrClound is NOT a master/slave architecture; there is no "master"
node.
Each shard has its own "leader", which can vary over time. It's called
"leader election". But, there is no cosmic significance to being a
Thank you,
problem solved!
On 13.07.2013 12:16, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hi,
Does the same happen if you use +*foo* +*bar* syntax?
If such queries turn out to be too slow, consider indexing ngrams.
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/
Performance Monitoring -- http://s
Since SolrCloud is a master-free architecture, you can send both queries
and updates to ANY node and SolrCloud will assure that the data gets to
where it belongs
its way faster to send them to right node
Ya :-) I need it for different reason.
I have 8 server nodes and one of them has to invoke scheduled data import
(by invoking CloudSolrServer)... And that's why I need to identify exclusive
server (it doesn't have to be leader but I think it is the simplest
solution). I don't want to invoke schedu
The point is that there is no "right" node. The concept of a "right" node
does not exist in SolrCloud. All of the nodes of a shard are equally valid
for both query and update requests.
Be careful not to fall into the trap of premature optimization, which is
usually a false optimization and tha
Thank you for highlighting the actual issue that needs to be addressed.
At this point, I don't know if there is any best answer as to where in the
cluster aggregate operations like Data Import Handler and Solr Cell should
be run. My own inclination is that both of them need to be pulled out of
Not quite sure what you mean here, a couple of examples would help.
But since the term is using keyword tokenizer, then each thing you get
back is a complete term, by definition. So I'm not quite sure what you're
asking here.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Lochschmied, Alexander
At a first glance, you're replacing the apostrophe with a space
so INT'L becomes INT L, two separate tokens. Why not
replace with ""? I.e. remove the apostrophe?
I also suspect you actually want WhitespaceTokensizerFactory,
KeywordTokenizerFactory will cause "my dog has fleas" to be
indexed exactl
Wait, you can't do this. You're changing the number
of shards? Your original startup specified a single shard,
bringing up another node and calling it "shard2" isn't
consistent.
If you'd brought up a single shard while telling SolrCloud that
there were 2 shards, you shouldn't have been able to ind
We run Jetty 8 and 9 with Solr. No issues I can think of.
We use Jetty interally anyways, and it seemed to be the most common
container out there for Solr (from reading this mailinglist, articles,
etc), so that made me feel a bit better if I needed advice or help from
the community - not to sa
Of course you may have some reasons to use Tomcat or anything else (i.e.
your stuff may have more experience at Tomcat etc.) However developers
generally runs Jetty because it is default for Solr and I should point that
Solr unit tests run against jetty (in fact, a specific version of Jetty)
and we
Very good point, Furkan.
The unit tests being ran against Jetty is another very good reason to
feel safer on Jetty, IMHO. I'm assuming the SolrCloud ChaosMonkey tests
are ran against Jetty as well?
Tim
On 13/07/13 02:46 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
Of course you may have some reasons to use Tom
On 7/13/2013 3:55 PM, Tim Vaillancourt wrote:
> Very good point, Furkan.
>
> The unit tests being ran against Jetty is another very good reason to
> feel safer on Jetty, IMHO. I'm assuming the SolrCloud ChaosMonkey tests
> are ran against Jetty as well?
All Solr unit tests either access the under
19 matches
Mail list logo
