The problem was connected with filter order. WordDelimiterFilter should be
put before others. Thanks for your help.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Query-parser-cuts-last-letter-from-search-term-tp4053432p4053736.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list ar
A custom QueryResponseWriter...this makes sense, thanks Jack
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> The search components can see the "response" as a namedlist, but it is
> only when SolrDispatchFIlter calls the QueryResponseWriter that XML or JSON
> or whatever other format (J
It its in your SolrCloud-based collection's config, it won't be on disk
and only in Zookeeper.
What I did was use the XInclude feature to include a file with my
dataimport handler properties, so I'm assuming you're doing the same.
Use a relative path to the config dir in Zookeeper, ie: no path
On 04/03/2013 07:22 AM, amit wrote:
Below is my query
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=subject:session management in
php&fq=category:[*%20TO%20*]&fl=category,score,subject
You specify that you want "session" to appear in field "subject", but
the other tokens only match to the default searc
Hi Jan,
Thanks for your reply. I have defined string_ci like below:
When I analyse the query in solr, I saw that document containing
pg_series_title_ci:"funny" matches when I do a search for
pg_series_title_ci:"funny games" a
Hi,
I configured index-based spell check component and unexpected problem
occurs.
*CASE 1: *
I added two documents with following content:
1. handbuch
2. hanbuch
The suggestions are returned for both terms: e.g. handbuch -> hanbuch and
hanbuch-> handbuch.
Comment: Works as expected.
*CASE 2:
Hi,
I think you need to use the alternativeTermCount parameter (
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.alternativeTermCount)
to return suggestions for terms which occur less often than the
user-entered term.
More discussion here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2585
I tried to add spellcheck.alternativeTermCount=5 but still no suggestion has
been found.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spell-check-component-does-not-return-any-suggestions-tp4053757p4053772.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
we've successfully implemented suggestion of search terms using facet
prefixing with Solr 4.0. However, with lots of unique index terms we've
encountered performance problems (long running queries) and even
exceptions: "Too many values for UnInvertedField faceting on field
textbody".
We
The simple way to write the query:
q=subject:session subject:management subject:in subject:php
Would be:
q=subject:(session management in php)
Of course, edismax is usually a better way to go in general.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Andre Bois-Crettez
Sent: Thursday, Ap
Technically, update and add are identical from a user perspective - you
don't need to worry about whether the document already exists.
But, there is another, newer form of update, "selective" or "atomic" which
is updating a subset of the fields in an existing document without needing
to re-sen
I craw webages with Nutch and send them to Solr for indexing. There are two
parameters to send data into Solr. One of them is -index and the other one
is -reindex. I just want to learn what they do.
2013/4/4 Jack Krupansky
> Technically, update and add are identical from a user perspective - yo
That's a question for the Nutch email list.
In Solr, "reindexing" simply means that you manually delete your full Solr
index (or at least delete all documents using a query) and fully ingest all
documents, from scratch. There is no "option", it's just something that you,
the user/developer, do
I assume you're using Nutch 2.x? Nutch 1.x does not have such an option and i
find it strange to hear 2.x does. It really makes no sense to have a -reindex
option and it should be removed. I'd recommend to stick to plain indexing.
-Original message-
> From:Jack Krupansky
> Sent: Thu 0
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> I craw webages with Nutch and send them to Solr for indexing. There are two
> parameters to send data into Solr. One of them is -index and the other one
> is -reindex. I just want to learn what they do.
>
Are you sure this is not Nutch-side i
On 4 April 2013 18:33, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> I craw webages with Nutch and send them to Solr for indexing. There are two
> parameters to send data into Solr. One of them is -index and the other one
> is -reindex. I just want to learn what they do.
[...]
Which version of Nutch are you using?
Unle
I use Nutch 2.1 and using that:
bin/nutch solrindex http://localhost:8983/solr -index
bin/nutch solrindex http://localhost:8983/solr -reindex
2013/4/4 Gora Mohanty
> On 4 April 2013 18:33, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> > I craw webages with Nutch and send them to Solr for indexing. There are
> two
>
Thank you for all your hard work!
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions
18 East 41st Street, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10017-6271
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2013, at 5:5
Thanks Jack and Andre
I am trying to use edismax;but struck with the NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/solr/response/QueryResponseWriter
I am using solr 3.6
I have followed the steps here
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/VelocityResponseWriter#Using_the_VelocityResponseWriter_in_Solr_Core
Just the jars
Good morning,
I'm currently running Solr 4.0 final with tika v1.2 and Manifoldcf v1.2 dev.
And I'm battling Tika XML parse errors again.
Solr reports this error:org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
org.apache.tika.exception.TikaException: XML parse error which is too vague.
I had to manu
ok, one possible fix is to add the xml equivalent to nbsp with is:
]>
but how do I add this into the tika configuration?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/detailed-Error-reporting-in-Solr-tp4053821p4053823.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archiv
If you are using dismax/edismax with mm=0 (or some other low number), you
should override this in the spellchecker. Specify
"spellcheck.collateParam.mm=100%", or something high like that. Likewise if
you're using the default lucene/solr query parser with q.op=OR, then you can
specify "spellch
On 4 April 2013 19:29, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> I use Nutch 2.1 and using that:
>
> bin/nutch solrindex http://localhost:8983/solr -index
> bin/nutch solrindex http://localhost:8983/solr -reindex
[...]
Sorry, but are you sure that you are using 2.1. Here is
what I get with:
./bin/nutch solrindex
U
On 4 April 2013 20:16, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On 4 April 2013 19:29, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
>> I use Nutch 2.1 and using that:
>>
>> bin/nutch solrindex http://localhost:8983/solr -index
>> bin/nutch solrindex http://localhost:8983/solr -reindex
> [...]
>
> Sorry, but are you sure that you are using
Make sure you also set spellcheck.onlyMorePopular=false (or leave it out as
"false" is the default) when using "spellcheck.alternativeTermCount". You may
also need to set "spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest=0". See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest
t
It may be a deprecated usage(maybe not) but certainly can run -index and
-reindex on Nutch 2.1.
2013/4/4 Gora Mohanty
> On 4 April 2013 20:16, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> > On 4 April 2013 19:29, Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> >> I use Nutch 2.1 and using that:
> >>
> >> bin/nutch solrindex http://localhos
Could you guys please take this discussion offline or over to a Nutch
mailing list - where it belongs? This has nothing to do with Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Gora Mohanty
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Differen
hello,
I'm using a single server setup with Nutch (1.6) and Solr (4.2)
I plan to trigger the Nutch crawling process every 30 minutes or so and add
about 300+ websites a month with (~5-10 pages each). At this point I'm not
sure about the query requests/sec.
Can I run this on a single server (how
Another problem that I see in Solr analysis is the query term that matches
the tokenized field does not match on the case insensitive field.
So, if I'm searching for 'coast to coast', I see that the tokenized series
title (pg_series_title) is matched but not the ci field which is
pg_series_title_ci
I am trying to understand how to plug data into the solr query option from
the UI.
The query below works on our old solr version (1.3) but does not return
results on 4.2. I pulled it from the catalina log file. I am trying to
plug in the values one by one into the query UI to see which one it is
On 4 April 2013 22:11, scallawa wrote:
> I am trying to understand how to plug data into the solr query option from
> the UI.
>
> The query below works on our old solr version (1.3) but does not return
> results on 4.2. I pulled it from the catalina log file. I am trying to
> plug in the values
I'm trying to understand the context is here... are you trying to crawl web
pages that have bad HTML? Or, ... what?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: eShard
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 10:23 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: detailed Error reporting in Solr
Good
Hi James,
Thanks for the response.
Nope, I'm not using dismax or edismax. Just the standard solr query parser.
Also by using the variable "spellcheck.collateParam.q.op=AND" I see this
working. This also means that all the words need to correct and the
maxEdits can only be 2 else it won't sugges
Yes, that's it exactly.
I crawled a link with these ( ›) in each list item and solr
couldn't handle it threw the xml parse error and the crawler terminated the
job.
Is this fixable? Or do I have to submit a bug to the tika folks?
Thanks,
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.
Use IndexBasedSpellChecker instead of DirectSolrSpellChecker if you need more
than 2 edits. You may need to set the "accuracy" parameter lower than the
default of .5
Keep in mind that while this might get the correct responses for your test
cases, in the wild your users might find their queri
hi all
I am using solr directspellcheker for spell suggestions using raw analyses
for indexing but I have some fields which have single characters like l L
so its is been indexed in the dictionary and when I am using this for
suggestions for query like delll its suggesting de and l l l as the spel
I assume if your user queries "delll" and it breaks it into pieces like "de l l
l", then you're probably using WordBreakSolrSpellChecker in addition to
DirectSolrSpellChecker, right? If so, then you can specify "minBreakLength" in
solrconfig.xml like this:
... spellcheckers here ...
wo
We are still in the testing phase for 4.2. A new server was built and the
latest tomcat, java and solr were installed. The schema file was copied
over from the old and then customized as follows.
Schema Changes
We changed all float field types to tfloat. The solrqueryparser default
operator is s
On 4/4/2013 12:34 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
In the case of maxWarmingSearchers, I would hope that you have your
system set up so that you would never need more than 1 warming searcher
at a time. If you do a commit while a previous commit is still warming,
Solr will try to create a second warming se
I've been away from Tika for awhile, so I'm not sure. This might also be an
issue of Tika using a strict XML parser for HTML rather than a looser and
more error-tolerant HTML-specific parser, like most browsers use, that
allows these kinds of technical "errors" that in reality, in most cases, ca
I had read somewhere that text fields by default were compressed in 4.2.1,
is this the case? If not how do I enable compression of stored text fields?
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I had read somewhere that text fields by default were compressed in 4.2.1,
> is this the case? If not how do I enable compression of stored text fields?
Compressed stored fields are the default since 4.1
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
I found the problem. The values that we have for cat-path include the
special character "/". This was not a special character in pre 4.0
releases. That explains why it worked in my previous version but not in
4.2.
Pre 4.0
Lucene supports escaping special characters that are part of the query
Hi I saw some similar problems in other threads but I think that this is a
little different and couldn't get any solution.*I get the exception
*/org.apache.lucene.search.highlight.InvalidTokenOffsetsException: Token
eightysix exceeds length of provided text sized 80/This happens for example
when I
- Is dataimport.properties ever written to the filesystem? (Trying to
determine if I have a permissions error because I don't see it anywhere
on disk).
- How do you manually edit dataimport.properties? My system is
periodically pulling in new data. If that process has issues, I want to
be able
"We need to also track the size of the response (as the size in bytes of the
whole xml response tat is streamed, with stored fields and all). I was a
bit worried cause I am wondering if a searchcomponent will actually have
access to the response bytes..."
==> Can't you get this from your container
There's a whole heap of information that is missing like what you plan on
storing vs indexing and yes QPS too. My short answer is try with one server
until it falls over then start adding more.
When you say multiple-server setup do you mean multiple servers where each
server acts as a slave storin
hi james
after using this its working file for delll but not for de. what does
this minbreaklength signifies?
also can you tell me why am I not getting suggestions for smaller words
like for del i should get dell as suggestion but its not giving any
suggestions and also can I get suggestion
48 matches
Mail list logo
