It seems to me like you want to use result grouping by hotel. You'll
have to add up the tariffs for each hotel, but that isn't hard.
Upayavira
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013, at 06:08 AM, Harshvardhan Ojha wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> I saw "prices based on daterange using multipoints ".
Hi,
maybe I'm thinking too simple again. Nevertheless, here an idea to solve
the question. The basic thought is to get rid of the range query.
Have:
- a textfield 'vacant_days'. Instead of ISO-Dates just simple dates in
the form mmdd
- a dynamic field 'price_*', You can add the tariff for Jan
Dear Solr Users,
Does anyone have a plugin to scan the number of request (/select) by
hour/day/week/Month/Year
I try to use the plugin solr_qps but it's not really good.
Thanks a lot,
Bruno
Hi all,
Hope you don't mind me cluttering up the list with a job offer. We're a
team of search specialists based in the UK and we're hiring:
http://www.flax.co.uk/hiring/
We're ideally looking for someone with experience of Apache Lucene/Solr
development, able to work on a flexible contract b
Hi
We are doing a lat/lon look up query using ip address.
We have a 6.5 million document core of the following structure
start ip block
end ip block
location id
location_lat_lon
the field defs are
the query at the moment is simply a range query
q=startIpNum:[* TO 180891652]A
Thanks. It isn't necessarily the need to match 'dick' to 'robert' but to
search for:
'name surname'
name, surname'
'surname name'
'surname, name'
And nothing else, I don't need to worry about nick names or abbreviations
of a name, just the above variations. I think I might use text_ws.
On Tue, J
Also. I'm allowing users to do enter a name with quotes to search for an
exact name. So at the moment only "smith, robert" will return any results
where *robert smith* will return all variations including 'smith, herbert'
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Michael Jones wrote:
> Thanks. It isn't n
Hi,
The alternateField and maxAlternateFieldLength params work well, but only as
long as the alternate field actually exists for the document. If it does not,
highlighting returns nothing.
We would like this behavior
1. Highlighting in "body" if matches
2. Fallback to verbatim "teaser" if it ex
Hi Uwe,
Thanks for your reply. I think this will solve my problem.
Regards
Harshvardhan Ojha
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Reh [mailto:r...@hebis.uni-frankfurt.de]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 2:52 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Hotel Searches
Hi,
maybe I'm thinki
Hi,
Without seeing the configs I would guess default query operator might be OR
(and check docs for mm parameter on the Wiki) or there are ngrams involved.
Former is more likely.
Otis
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Jan 9, 2013 6:16 AM, "Michael Jones" wrote:
> Also. I'm al
I am testing it.. and i will upload it after that..
./Zahoor
HBase Musings
On 09-Jan-2013, at 2:55 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> Have you uploaded a patch to JIRA???
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013, at 07:57 PM, jmozah wrote:
>> Hmm. Fixed it.
>>
>> Did similar thing as SOLR-247 for distrib
Hi ,
That should be fairly easy to make in alternateField() in
DefaultSolrHighlighter. We made a small change there to support globs in
alternateField.
Cheers,
-Original message-
> From:Jan Høydahl
> Sent: Wed 09-Jan-2013 12:44
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Highlighti
Hi,
My schema file is here http://pastebin.com/ArY7xVUJ
Query (name:'ian paisley') returns ~ 3000 results
Query (name:'paisley, ian') returns ~ 250 results - That is how the name is
stored, so is returning just the results with that person.
I need all variations to return 250 results
Query (nam
Try q=name:(ian paisley)&q.op=AND
Does that work better for you?
It would also match Ian James Paisley, but not Ian Jackson.
Upayavira
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013, at 01:30 PM, Michael Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My schema file is here http://pastebin.com/ArY7xVUJ
>
> Query (name:'ian paisley') returns ~
Hi,
Is possible to restore an old backup without shutting down Solr?
Regards,
Sergio
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Restore-hot-backup-tp4031866.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Brilliant! Thank you!
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> q=name:(ian paisley)&q.op=AND
Hi,
I have a performance issue with group.ngroups=true parameters.
I have an index with 100k documents (small documents, 1-10 documents per
group, group on string field), if i make a q=*:*&...&group.ngroups=true i
have 4s responsetime vs 50ms without the ngroups parameters.
Is it a workaround fo
Hi All,
I have a client app that uses SolrJ and which requires to collect the names
(and just the names) of all loaded cores.
I have about 380 Solr Cores on a single Solr server (net indices size is about
220GB).
Running the STATUS action takes about 800ms - that seems a bit too long, given
my
Hello,
we are upgrading solr from 1.3 to 4.0.
In solr 1.3 we used the SOLR-236 patch to realize grouping/ field
collapsing.
We did not have a memory issue with the field collapsing feature in our 1.3
version.
However, we do now. The query looks something like this:
http://localhost:8983/solr/sele
Hey Shawn,
Thanks a lot for your detailed explanation on deletionPolicy.
Although it's frustrated that Solr doesn't support the function I need, I'm
really glad that you point it out so that I can move on.
What I'm thinking now is adding a new field for the time a document is
indexed, so a simple
Hi,
Simple question, I hope.
Using the nightly build of 4.1 from yesterday (Jan 8, 2013), I started 6 Solr
nodes.
I issued the following command to create a collection with 3 shards, and a
replication factor=2. So a total of 6 shards.
curl
'http://localhost:11000/solr/admin/collections?a
Hi Otis
The cache was modest 4096 with a hit rate of 0.23 after a 24hr period.
We doubled it and the hit rate went to 0.25. Our interpretation is ip is
pretty much a cache busting value ? and
cache size is not at play here.
the q param is just startIpNum:[* TO 180891652]AND endIpNum:[180891652 TO
If you are in multicore mode, you can stop a core, move the backed up
files into place, and restart/recreate the core. That would have the
effect you desire.
You may well be able to get away with swapping out the files and
reloading the core, but the above would be safer. Best make sure you're
not
I just tried this. I started 6 nodes with collection1 spread across two shards.
Looked at the admin->cloud->graph view and everything looked right and green.
Next, I copy and pasted your command and refreshed the graph cloud view.
I see a new collection called consumer1 - all of it's nodes are g
On 1/8/2013 11:19 PM, vijeshnair wrote:
Yes Shawn, the batchSize is -1 only and I also have the mergeScheduler
exactly same as you mentioned. When I had this problem in SOLR 3.4, I did
an extensive googling and gathered much of the tweaks and tuning from
different blogs and forums and configured
group.ngroups=true is always going to be somewhat expensive, but in your
case it seems more expensive than I would expect. You should check to see
that you have enough Java JVM heap to hold more of the index and to avoid
any excessive GCs.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: M
I also don't know what's creating them. Maybe Solr, but also maybe Tomcat,
maybe apache commons. I could change java.io.tmpdir to one with more space,
but the problem is that many of the temp files end up permanent, so eventually
it would still run out of space. I also considered setting the
On 1/9/2013 9:41 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
With maxThreadCount at 1 and maxMergeCount at 6, I was able to complete
full-import with no problems. All mysql (5.1.61) server-side timeouts
are at their defaults - they don't show up in my.cnf and I haven't
tweaked them anywhere else either.
A full imp
Erick,
Alex asked about Solr 4 spatial, and his use-case requires it because
he's got multi-value spatial fields (multiple business office locations
per document). So the Solr 3 spatial solution you posted won't cut it.
Alex,
You can do this in Solr 4.0. Use one facet.query per circle (I.e.
Thanks Otis and Jack for your responses.
We are trying to use embeddedsolr server with a solr query as follows:
EmbeddedSolrServer server = new EmbeddedSolrServer(coreContainer, "");
SolrQuery solrQuery = new SolrQuery(luceneQuery.toString()); //
Here luceneQuery is a dismax query with a
Sorry, I did search for an answer, but didn't find an applicable one.
I'm currently stuck on 1.4.1 (running in Tomcat 6 on 64bit Linux) for
the time being...
When I see stats like this:
name: documentCache
class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
version: 1.0
description: LRU
Thanks for the quick reply Mark.
I tried all kinds of variations, I could not get all 6 nodes to participate.
So I downloaded the source code and took a look at
OverseerCollectionProcessor.java
I think my result is as-coded.
Line 251 has this loop:
for (int i = 1; i <= numSlices; i++) {
I forgot to mention.When I add documents to SOLR, I add it in batches of 50.
Because my table has a lot of records, I have to do in batches due to memory
constraints. The 'Communication error' occurs only for some batches. For
other batches, documents get added properly. And also, I am including t
On 1/9/2013 11:48 AM, ddineshkumar wrote:
I forgot to mention.When I add documents to SOLR, I add it in batches of 50.
Because my table has a lot of records, I have to do in batches due to memory
constraints. The 'Communication error' occurs only for some batches. For
other batches, documents get
Oops, small copy-paste error. Had my i's and j's backwards.
Should be:
--- slice1, rep2 (i=1,j=2) ==> chooses node[1]
--- slice2, rep1 (i=2,j=1) ==> chooses node[1]
-Original Message-
From: James Thomas [mailto:jtho...@camstar.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 1:39 PM
To: solr-use
Hello!
You should set the q.op parameter in your request handler
configuration in solrconfig.xml instead of using the default operator
from schema.xml.
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch
> I'm testing out Solr 4.0. I got the sample
Hi Ryan,
One typically uses a Solr client library to talk to Solr instead of sending
raw XML. For example, if your application in written in Java then you
would use SolrJ.
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Ryan Josal wrote:
> I also
Aha. I think the problem here is the assumption that .toString() on Lucene
query will give you a string that can then be re-parsed in the proper query
and that is currently not the case. But if you start with the raw query
like the one you would use with the Lucene QP, you should be fine.
Can yo
Hi,
In your Solr version there is a notion of Searcher being opened and
reopened. Every time that happens those non-cumulative stats reset. The
cumulative_ stats just don't refresh, so you have numbers from when the
whole Solr started, not just from the last time Searcher opened.
Your cache is
Hi,
It is not Eclipse related, neither codec related. There were two issues
I had a wrong configuration of NumericConfig:
new NumericConfig(4, NumberFormat.getNumberInstance(), NumericType.FLOAT))
I changed that to:
new NumericConfig(4, NumberFormat.getNumberInstance(Locale.US),
NumericType.FLO
> Are you sure a commit didn't happen between?
> Also, a background merge might have happened.
>
> As to using a backup, you are right, just stop solr,
> put the snapshot into index/data, and restart.
This was mentioned before but seems not to have gotten any attention: can't
you use the Replicat
Hi Paul,
Hot backup is OK. There was a thread on this topic yesterday and the day
before. But you should always try running from backup regardless of what
anyone says here, because if you have to do that one day you want to
know you verified it :)
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http:/
Just to satisfy my curiosity - are you looking to have TTL for documents or
for indices?
The former: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3874
The latter: no issue that I know off, typically managed by the application.
Otis
--
Solr & ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Wed, J
Thanks Shawn. I tried increasing following timeouts in php:
max_execution_time
max_input_time
default_socket_timeout
But still I get 'Communication error'. Please let me know if I have to
change any other timeout in php.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOL
Exactly what I want.
For a simple scenario:
Index a batch of documents 20 days ago and they are searchable via Solr.
After say 20 days, you can't search them anymore because they are deleted
automatically by Solr.
Thanks,
Hao
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/C
Options:
1. Run delete by query every N hours/days to purge old docs
2. Create daily indices and drop them every H hours/days to get rid of all
old docs
The TTL support for 1. would probably be implemented with delete by query.
The drawback of 1. compared to 2. is that you will pay the price when
Solr does not delete anything automatically.
Add a timestamp field when you index.
Use delete by query to delete everything older than 20 days.
wunder
On Jan 9, 2013, at 12:44 PM, hyrax wrote:
> Exactly what I want.
> For a simple scenario:
> Index a batch of documents 20 days ago and they are
Yes, I agree about making sure the backups actually work, whatever the
approach. Thanks for your reply and all you've contributed to the
Solr/Lucene community. The Lucene in Action book has been a huge help to me.
Paul
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
otis.gospodne...@gmail.co
hello,
environment: solr 3.5
i have a requirement to perform a boolean query (like the example below)
with a large number of terms.
the number of terms could be 15 or possibly larger.
after looking over several theads and the smiley book - i think i just have
include the parens and string all o
Thanks Otis,
DirectXmlRequest is part of the SolrJ library, so I guess that means it is not
commonly used. My use case is that I'm applying an XSLT to the raw XML on the
client side, instead of leaving that up to the Solr master (although even if I
applied the XSLT on the Solr server, I'd stil
The point was as much about how to use a backup, as to how to make one
in the first place. the replication handler can handle spitting out a
backup, but there's no straightforward way to tell Solr to switch to
another set of index files instead. You'd have to do clever stuff with
the CoreAdminHandl
Hi,
I'm trying to write some tests based on SolrTestCaseJ4 that test using velocity
in SOLR. I found VelocityResponseWriterTest.java, but this does not test that.
In fact it has a todo to do what I want to do.
Anyone have an example out there?
I just need to check if velocity is loaded with m
Any comments on this? Thanks very much in advance!
2013/1/9 Yandong Yao
> Hi Solr Guru,
>
> I have two set of documents in one SolrCore, each set has about 1M
> documents with different document type, say 'type1' and 'type2'.
>
> Many documents in first set are very similar with 1 or 2 documents
just curious as to what the difference is between 4.1 and 5.0
i.e. is 4.1 a maintenance branch for what is currently 4.0 or are they very
different designs/architectures
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/what-is-difference-between-4-1-and-5-x-tp4032064.html
Se
On 1/9/2013 10:38 AM, Shahar Davidson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a client app that uses SolrJ and which requires to collect the names
> (and just the names) of all loaded cores.
> I have about 380 Solr Cores on a single Solr server (net indices size is
> about 220GB).
>
> Running the STATUS ac
On 1/9/2013 5:11 PM, solr-user wrote:
just curious as to what the difference is between 4.1 and 5.0
i.e. is 4.1 a maintenance branch for what is currently 4.0 or are they very
different designs/architectures
There are several code branches in the SVN repository. I'll talk about
three of them
On 1/9/2013 8:38 AM, Shahar Davidson wrote:
I have a client app that uses SolrJ and which requires to collect the names
(and just the names) of all loaded cores.
I have about 380 Solr Cores on a single Solr server (net indices size is about
220GB).
Running the STATUS action takes about 800ms -
Marcos -
I just happen to be tinkering with VrW over the last few days (to get some big
improvements across the board with it and the /browse UI into Solr 5.0, and
maybe eventually 4.x too), so I whipped up such a test case just now.
Here's the short and sweet version:
public void testVeloci
Anyone have experience with internationalizing the field names in the SOLR
schema, so users in different languages can specify fields in their own
language? My first thoughts would be to create a custom search component or
query parser than would convert localized field names back to the English
Patience, young Yandong :)
Multi-threading *in your application* is the way to go. Alternatively, one
could write a custom SearchComponent that is called once and inside of
which the whole work is done after just one call to it. This component
could then write the output somewhere, like in a new i
And to add a little to this, since it looked ugly below, the
$response.response.response.numFound thing is something I'm going to improve to
make it leaner and cleaner to get at the actual result set and other response
structures. $response is the actual SolrQueryResponse, and navigating that
At this scale, your indexing job is prone to break in various ways.
If you want this to be reliable, it should be able to restart in the
middle of an upload, rather than starting over.
On 01/08/2013 10:19 PM, vijeshnair wrote:
Yes Shawn, the batchSize is -1 only and I also have the mergeSchedu
Hi Yonik,
Could you merger this feature with 4.0 branch, We tried to use 4.1 it did
solve the CPU spike but we did get other issues. As we are very tight on
schedule so it would very beneficial if you could merge this feature with
4.0 branch.
Let me know.
Thanks
--
View this message in contex
It may be able to do that because it's forwarding requests to other nodes that
are up?
Would be good to dig into the logs to see if you can narrow in on the reason
for the recovery_failed.
- Mark
On Jan 9, 2013, at 8:52 PM, Zeng Lames wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> we meet below strange case in producti
On 1/9/2013 7:01 PM, sausarkar wrote:
Hi Yonik,
Could you merger this feature with 4.0 branch, We tried to use 4.1 it did
solve the CPU spike but we did get other issues. As we are very tight on
schedule so it would very beneficial if you could merge this feature with
4.0 branch.
4.1 *is* the
I have a lot of experience with Solr, starting with 1.4.0 and currently
running 3.5.0 in production. I am working on a 4.1 upgrade, but I have
not touched SolrCloud at all.
I now need to set up a brand new Solr deployment to replace a custom
Lucene system, and due to the way the client works,
I'd put everything into one. You can upload different named sets of config
files and point collections either to the same sets or different sets.
You can really think about it the same way you would setting up a single node
with multiple cores. The main difference is that it's easier to share se
Hi Otis,
Really appreciate your help on this!! Will go with multi-thread firstly,
and then provide a custom component when performance is not good enough.
Regards,
Yandong
2013/1/10 Otis Gospodnetic
> Patience, young Yandong :)
>
> Multi-threading *in your application* is the way to go. Alter
thanks Mark. will further dig into the logs. there is another problem
related.
we have collections with 3 shards (2 nodes in one shard), the collection
have about 1000 records in it. but unfortunately that after the leader is
down, replica node failed to become the leader.the detail is : after the
69 matches
Mail list logo
