Hi Shawn,
actually I use munin for monitoring but just checked with jvisualvm
which also runs fine for remote monitoring.
You might try the following:
http://www.codefactorycr.com/java-visualvm-to-profile-a-remote-server.html
You have to:
- generate a policy file on the server to be monitored
-
The base problem is you don't know what they are in advance. You could
simply attach &facet.field=name_0&facet.field=name_1
Or is "name" variable too? If it is, you could query the index up-front and
get all of the dynamic field names (the admin page does this) and assemble
the above from the
I am curious to know what issues you are facing with 3.5 and large indices.
We use 3.5 with 200g indices with no issues until now
-Ani
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012, Luis Cappa Banda wrote:
> Any idea about when Solr 4.1 will be released?
>
> 2012/12/18 Otis Gospodnetic >
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > If yo
FIrst question: Is the "name" field stored (stored="true")? If it isn't,
that would explain your problems with that field. _all_ relevant fields
(i.e. everything not a destination of a copyField) need to be stored for
atomic updates to work.
Your second problem I'm not sure about. I remember some
Thanks for letting us know, and do bring let us know if you see the problem
again.
Erick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:39 AM, John Nielsen wrote:
> I build a solr version from the solr-4x branch yesterday and so far am
> unable to replicate the problems i had before.
>
> I am cautiously optimistic
On 12/19/2012 1:39 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
Hi Shawn,
actually I use munin for monitoring but just checked with jvisualvm
which also runs fine for remote monitoring.
You might try the following:
http://www.codefactorycr.com/java-visualvm-to-profile-a-remote-server.html
You have to:
- generate
Hi Erick,
The name field is stored. I experience problem only when I update
multiValued field with multiple values like,
* solr*
* lucene*
*
*
It works perfect, when I set single value for multiValued field like,
*solr*
Thanks,
Dikchant
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> F
OK, I will try to upgrade Oracle java and the lastest solr. thanks
2012/12/19 Shawn Heisey
> On 12/18/2012 8:18 PM, Jam Luo wrote:
> > I deployed a solr-4.0-beta cluster, 4 shard, 2 peers in a shard. A peer
> > catch exception:
> > 十二月 18, 2012 7:56:31 下午 org.apache.solr.common.SolrException l
I was noticing when I was looking this up in LIA yesterday a mention was made
that when using a field list to return just some of the stored fields, that it
still takes time to seek over the fields you don't want. So, if it has this
strict guarantee about order, could a user potentially optimiz
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> I agree with James. Actually lucene tests will fail if a codec violates this.
>
> Actually it goes much deeper than this.
>
> From the lucene apis, when you call IndexReader.document() with your
> storedfieldVisitor, it must visit the fields in
Hi,
I'm encountering this error randomly when running a distributed facet. (i.e.
I'm sending the exact same request, yet this does not reproduce consistently)
I have about 180 shards that are being queried.
It seems that when Solr distributes the request to the shards one , or perhaps
more, sh
nope.
The closest features is
http://www.findwise.com/blog/externalfilefield-in-solr/
there is a prebuild framework from the vendor
http://lucidworks.lucidimagination.com/display/lweug/Click+Scoring+Relevance+Framework
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Pratyul Kapoor wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I a
Let me try and get a better idea of what you're after. Is it that your users
might query a combination of irrelevant terms and misspelled terms, so you want
the ability to ignore the irrelevant terms but still get suggestions for the
misspelled terms?
For instance if someone wanted "q=christma
The default host for urls is /solr. Looks like you want to run on the root
context. In Solr 4.1 this is best done by setting the host to / (either in
solr.xml or with the hostContext sys prop). For 4.0 you have to use a host
context of "." to run on the root context.
- Mark
On Dec 19, 2012, at
We're currently running Solr 3.5 and our indexing process works as follows:
We have a master that has a cron job to run a delta import via DIH every 5
minutes. The delta-import takes around 75 minutes to full complete, most of
that is due to optimization after each delta and then the slaves s
Hi Otis,
I customized the Similarity class and add it through the end of schema.xml:
... ...
and mypackage.NoTfSimilarity.java is like:
public class NoTfSimilarity extends DefaultSimilarity
{
public float tf(float freq)
{
return freq > 0 ? 1.0f : 0.0f;
}
public flo
Hi,
I have a state column defined in schema.xml as
The getbeans method of Queryrespoinse using solj API is throwing binding
exception as follows..Probably the special characters like [ : / - might be
throwing this error..
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.beans.Binding
Hi Otis,
here is the debug output on the query... seems all tf and idf indeed return
1.0f as I customized... I did not overwrite queryNorm or weight etc... see
below.
but the bottom line is that if my purpose is to reduce the frq file size,
customize similarity seems wont help on that. I guess th
Hi James,
Yup the example you gave about sums it up. Reason we use an OR query is
that we want the flexibility of every term not having to match but when it
comes to corrections we want to be sure that the ones we pick will actually
return results (we message the user with the corrected query so i
Though the type is String its storing the datatype as List because the
mutlitvalued=true in the schema.xml. So the issue got resolved after I
change my datatype of State variable in the POJO from String to List.
Thanks
Sadhana
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble
Well, I saw, that when I ran the full/delta i,port process on the 2nd, 3rd
etc times I didn't so this exception any more. So I checked in my mysql
queries log what's going on in mysql when I was running delta import process
and I saw, that the queries got correct times on each delta-import
executio
Instead of using spellcheck.collateParam.mm, try just setting
spellcheck.maxResultsForSuggest to a very high value (you can use up to
Integer.MAX_VALUE here). So long as the user gets fewer results that whatever
this is set for, you will get suggestions (and collations if desired). I was
just
Someone with more zookeeper knowledge than I have can better answer this, but
there is code in place specifically for using DIH with SolrCloud to save the
"dataimport.properties" file in an appropriate place. The default path is:
/configs/{collection}/dataimport.properties I'm not sure which
Hello,
Don't know if the Solr admin panel is lying, or if this is a wierd bug.
The string: "1986年" gets analyzed by the ICUTokenizer with "1986" being
identified as type:NUM and script:Han. Then the CJKBigram filter
identifies "1986" as type:Num and script:Han and "年" as type:Single and
script:
This seems an known issue:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/StatsComponent
TrieFields has to use a precisionStep of -1 to avoid using
UnInvertedField.java. Consider using one field for doing stats, and one for
doing range facetting on.
To fix this problem. and support dacet search on this field, I hav
Your attachment didnt come through: I think the list strips them.
Maybe just open a JIRA and attach your screenshots? or put them
elsewhere and just include a link?
As far as the ultimate behavior, I think its correct. Keep in mind
tokens don't really get a script value: runs of untokenized text d
On 12/19/2012 11:50 AM, Mark wrote:
We have a master that has a cron job to run a delta import via DIH every 5
minutes. The delta-import takes around 75 minutes to full complete, most of
that is due to optimization after each delta and then the slaves sync up. Our
index is around 30 gigs so a
Hi David,
Your latest response was lost in my inbox, I just realised it was there.
You are right, I am using Open Layers, and even though I use the mercator
projection, there are elements that not adhere to that projection, in
particular the polygon that generates the circle and the scale contro
We configured Enhanced search in our environment and while testing noticed
below behavior:
Just searching for "P" returns Enterprise ID which has "P" (Pankaj) as well as
Resource Entity which has "P" (Sowmya), and the result lists Sowmya above
Pankaj.
* We are looking to limit the search
Hello,
I´m using solr 1.4
How can I update solr index creating fields that must be updated with arrays
?
My code is:
long arrayOfLong[] = new long [] {1,2,3} ;
SolrInputDocument doc = new SolrInputDocument();
doc.setField(field.getFieldName(), arrayOfLong);
when updating the following error i
Hi,
I wanted to put the fields I want to be searched in qf but it looks like
edismax is not using it.
I have the ff request handler made for testing edismax, used the sample xml
to populate my solr 4.0
explicit
edismax
features^1.0
1
We set up SolrCloud with 2 shards and separate multiple zookeepers. The
data added using http post with json in tutorial sample are not completely
returned in query.However, if you send the same http post request again
or shutdown solr instance and restart, the complete results will be
retur
Hi,
If I understand correctly, you want to search against a specific field -
enterprise id. To do that just use something like enterpriseid:(keywords).
Yes, you can sort using sort URL parameter. This stuff id on the Wiki and
you can search it, too. :)
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http:
The white space is probably messing things up.
Change:
features^1.0
to
features^1.0
It SHOULDN'T be a problem, but...
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jose Yadao
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 6:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: edismax request handle
Thanks but that didn't work.
Parsedquery doesn't show DisjunctionMaxQuery it's using the default field
of select
text:car
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> The white space is probably messing things up.
>
> Change:
>
>
>
> features^1.0
>
>
> to
>
>
> features^1.0
>
> I
It may not be using that request handler. You are using the "qt" parameter,
but have you changed the compatibility setting to enable it? See the
comments in solrconfig.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jose Yadao
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 8:44 PM
To: solr-user@luce
Thanks! so using select was a old approach and was not the default since
3.6.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> It may not be using that request handler. You are using the "qt"
> parameter, but have you changed the compatibility setting to enable it? See
> the comments in s
I use Solr (SolrCloud) to index and search my tweets. There are about 16
million tweets and the index size is approximately 3 GB. The tweets are
indexed in real time as they come so that real time search is enabled.
Currently I use lowercase field type for my tweet body field. For a single
search t
Hello Mark
some of these questions has been touched recently, see below.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Mark wrote:
> We're currently running Solr 3.5 and our indexing process works as follows:
>
> .
>
> I also have the following questions.
> Does DIH work with Solr Cloud?
>
Yes. it seem
KeywordTokenizerFactory does not actually break the text into tokens. It
makes the whole field one whole token.
Is that what you actually want? I would have thought that at least tweet
body would be broken into words/tokens.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedI
You are completely right. I realized this, so is the only way to fix this is
to redeclare the field as text_en or text_en_splitting and then delete all
the documents and recreate the index? Or is there any other easy way?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Impro
Hi,
Suppose the document stored in the index has fields A and B.
What would be the best way to alter the value of B after the result set is
available?
The modified value of B is influenced by the value of A and also by some
custom logic based on (custom) SolrCache.
Can it be a custom function query
I'm using SOLR 4 for an application, where I need to search the index soon
after inserting records.
I'm using the solrj code below to get the last ID in the index. However, I
noticed that the last id I see when I execute a query through the solr web
admin is often lagging behind this. And that my
Hi,
I've written a unit test for a custom search component, which naturally
extends the SolrTestCaseJ4.
beforeClass() has initCore(), assertU(adoc()) and assertU(commit()) inside.
The test creates a SolrQueryRequest via req() and runs h.query(request). In
other words, nothing special.
I see a rathe
44 matches
Mail list logo
