the AlchemyAPI service is not mandatory (it's there just as an example and
can be safely removed), you can use whatever service you want as long as
it's wrapped by a UIMA AnalysisEngine and you specify its descriptor.
See following updateChain example configuration :
/path/to/KEAdescritpor.x
Thanks Tomás for the information so far.
You said:
You can effectively run with only one zk instance, the problem with this is
that if that instance dies, then your whole cluster will go down.
When the cluster goes down i can still send queries to the solr instances?
We have a lb that's choose a
Thanks Yuval and Otis for the reply.
Yuval: I tried different combination of facet.method (fc and enum) and
filtercache size but there was not much improvement in the processing time.
Otis: We have a plan in future to move this processing out of solr but it will
be a large code change at this p
The short answer is no; the number was chosen in an attempt to get as many
cores working in parallel to complete the search faster, but I realize that
there is an overhead incurred by distribution and merging the results.
We've now gone to 8 shards and will be monitoring performance.
/Martin
On
I think that's correct. Queries to the existing nodes will still work with
no ZK.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:16 AM, roySolr wrote:
> Thanks Tomás for the information so far.
>
> You said:
> You can effectively run with only one zk instance, the problem with this is
> that if that instance dies,
I have 2 Solr servers :
- 1 master
- 1 slave
The master server has a mounted VIP by heartbeat and can toggle on the other
server.
What do you think of the idea to put the same config file on the 2 servers
with master's replication handler url pointing on the vip?
--
View this message in conte
Hi all,
We are seeing a strange CPU spike on one of our solr4 servers which we are
unable to explain. The spike, which only lasts for a couple of minutes,
sends the disks racing. This happens a few times a times a day. This is
what the load looks like:
2012.Nov.14 13:37:172.77
2012.Nov.14 13:
Unless you stored all the original fields, I think you're stuck with
re-indexing all your docs
Best
Erick
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Ravi Solr wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a couple of questions. I need an easy way to clean up a gaffe
> with copyFields (close to a million docs). Is
Dave:
I should have asked this first. What version of Solr are you using? I Not
sure whether it was fixed in BETA or not (certainly is in the 4.0 GA
release). There was a problem with adding a doclist via solrj, here's one
related JIRA, although it wasn't the main fix:
https://issues.apache.org/j
Strange indeed. What about query load/ayes during that time? What about GC?
And does cache hit rate drop?
Otis
--
SOLR Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Nov 23, 2012 2:45 AM, "John Nielsen" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are seeing a strange CPU spike on one of our solr4 servers which
Per:
1> relevancy sorting on field names: First, you have to define what that
means ... Relavant to your query terms? Relevant by the count of field
names in a particular document? Under any circumstances, this seems like
it's heading towards some kind of analytics. Take a look at
FunctionQueries,
I'd be pretty cautious trying this, although I confess I haven't done it
personally. The problem here is that each node has to be able (and will)
talk to each leader and vice-versa. And the various replicas will have to
talk to every other replica. If the pipe connecting your data centers isn't
ver
Hi Guys,
I'm trying to use the MailEntityProcessor with Solr 4 and have a couple of
questions about. I already configured an IMAP Account to fetch mails from,
so I'm able to index some mails.
Questions/Issues:
1.) I set the fetchSize to 1 000 000 as the default 32k were not sufficient
at all, but
Best advice here is to look hard at admin/analysis and see.
But a couple of notes:
1> it's usually unnecessary to include the exact same synonyms in both
query and index time chains. Index-time is preferred.
2> putting lowercasefilter in front of worddelimiterfilter is going to
break wdff _if_ yo
Barry:
This is just an artifact of the output. If you set positionIncremenGap to 1
(or maybe 0, but I think 1) then phrase searches will work just fine across
multiple entries. With the proper setting for positionIncrementGap, there
is really no difference between multiValued and non-multiValued f
I run a batch fullindexing process but it seems to get disconnected
after the first batch.
Am using the php-solr-client. Am wondering if this thread is relevant to me:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201001.mbox/%3cd8b8d0161001122041w230b34efxdc15f17a8c8c4...@mail.gmail.
Hi All!
Has anyone ever had the following problem...
If use FastVectorHighlighter and boundaryScanner with hl.bs.type set to
SENTENCE there are situations when not all matched terms are highlighted
in fragments.
I.e.
1. FastVectorHighlighter generates FieldFragList with info on what term
Hi Erick
Thanks for reply.
In our application having product table with many fields and we are
providing these all fields during search. If we made de-normalized structure
then there is having lots of redundant data and that may result in to
1. required more amount of memory.
2. d
Hi there.
In our company we use Apache Solr 4 to index data from the database via the
databaseimport handler.
The data we are indexing is a denormalzied table (Patient, Visit, Study,
Image).
One requirement is to be near realtime. For that we use softcomits every
second.
The index size is about
2012/11/22 Martin Koch
> IMO it would be ideal if the lucene/solr community could come up with a
> good way of updating fields in a document without reindexing. This could be
> by linking to some external data store, or in the lucene/solr internals. If
> it would make things easier, a good first
Posted,
see it here
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Possible-sharded-and-replicated-replacement-for-ExternalFileFields-in-SolrCloud-td4022108.html
Simone
2012/11/23 Simone Gianni
> 2012/11/22 Martin Koch
>
>> IMO it would be ideal if the lucene/solr community could come up with a
>> good w
What is the best way to use span queries in solr ?
I see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-839 which enables the XML
Query parser that supports span queries.
--
Anirudha P. Jadhav
take a look at SOLR-2703, which was committed for 4.0. It provides a Solr
wrapper for the surround query parser, which supports span queries.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Anirudha Jadhav wrote:
> What is the best way to use span queries in solr ?
>
> I see https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
Can this be made to work with solr 3.5 ?
i will give it a try.
Thanks
On Nov 23, 2012, at 17:28, simon wrote:
> take a look at SOLR-2703, which was committed for 4.0. It provides a Solr
> wrapper for the surround query parser, which supports span queries.
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM
Hi, I am also very much interested in this, since we use Solr 4 with NRT
where we update index every second but most of time it update only stored
filed.
if Solr/Lucene could provide external datastore without re-indexing even
for stored field only, it would be very beneficial for frequent update
Hi all,
I am encountering a problem where Solr 3.6.1 is not able to extract the text
content from ODT (Open Office Document) files submitted to the
ExtractingRequestHandler. I can reproduce this issue against the example schema
running with jetty.
Executing a simple index request (based on the
Sounds like perhaps the SynonymFilter is losing the positionIncrement
of 0 (which make the first two tokens overlap)?
You could perhaps verify with the analysis debugging on the admin page.
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Chris Book wrote:
> Hello, I've recently u
"the boosting at index time"
What index-time boosting are you referring to? I mean, tf and idf are used
to calculate scores at query time.
There is a document boost at index time, but that is independent of tf and
idf.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: flahti
Sent: Frida
Let me re-phrase. In our application de-normalizing "Will" result in to
1. required more amount of memory.
2. degrade search performance (cpu and response time)
Let me give example - Our application has product table with 1 million
entries and users are increasing exponentially.
29 matches
Mail list logo
