Hi Markus
There is an open issue for integrating a color legend:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3915
Stefan
On Sunday, November 18, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Markus.Mirsberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can someone give me a hint about the meaning of the different colors
> inside the cloud admin v
Hi,
yes all good thanks. It would be nice on this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Fields under "Common field options"
and also "Data Types - common options" to specify what Solr will use as
default is if an attribute is not specified (i.e. field will be stored if
the stored attribute i
Update! Thank you to Lance for the help. Based on your suggestion I have
fixed up a few things.
*My Dataconfig now has the filename pattern fixed and root entity=true*
/
/
*My data.xml has a corrected date format with "T":*
/
123
Delta Import 2
Depending on your use-case, you might be able to use the join
functionality. Be aware that this doesn't return the values of the
"from" field, so it may not be suitable.
_why_ do you want to do this? I'm wondering if this is an _XY_
problem.
Best,
Erick
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Indika T
Hello!
When queries become more and more complex and you need to apply one second
query with the resultant docs from the first one, or re-sort results, or
maybe add some promotional or special docs to the response, I recommend to
develop a Web App module that implements that complex business logic
Hi All,
I have been digging web for answers to some of my questions in my mind but
till now I am still not clear on them..
first (and main)question is about zookeeper itself.. are there any tutorials
in detail how we can use it with solr other than wikies? SolrCloud wiki page
is useful for sure,
You can do numeric math in function queries, but not string operations, and
there is no provision for doing string operations in a query using the
result of an embedded function query.
You haven't shown us a full query.
Sounds like we have another candidate for "XY Problem". First you need to
On Nov 18, 2012, at 10:02 PM, deniz wrote:
> removing a shard/replica temporarily and then adding back again
I'd unload them with http cmds (without using the options that delete things on
disk) and then create them again when I wanted them back.
- Mark
Hi,
We have a need to allow each user to 'exclude' individual documents in the
results. We can easily do this now within the RDBMS using a FTS index and a
query with 'OUTER LEFT JOIN WHERE NULL' type of thing.
Can Solr do this somehow? Heavy customization is not a problem - I would
bet this has a
Mark Miller-3 wrote
> On Nov 18, 2012, at 10:02 PM, deniz <
> denizdurmus87@
> > wrote:
>
>> removing a shard/replica temporarily and then adding back again
>
> I'd unload them with http cmds (without using the options that delete
> things on disk) and then create them again when I wanted them
Hi Jack,
Thanks for the response. Let me explain my question better.
I have a filter query to limit the query results,
start_time:[* TO 1970-01-01T10:55:002Z] AND end_time:[1970-01-01T10:55:002Z
TO *] AND session_time_range_available:true
and I also use the same query as a function query in fl u
Hello,
for test purposes, I am running two zookeepers on ports 2181 and 2182. and i
have two solr instances running on different machines...
For the one which is running on my local and acts as leader:
java -Dbootstrap_conf=true -DzkHost=localhost:2181 -jar start.jar
and for the one which acts
Stanislaw Osinski, stanislaw.osin...@carrotsearch.com
http://carrotsearch.com
I have very huge solr index. I want to tag all documents with terms that
> better represent that document like this
> <
> http://search.carrotsearch.com/carrot2-webapp/search?source=web&view=folders&skin=fancy-compact&q
I think there is already a BETA available:
http://luke.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
Changes in unreleased version:
* Update to 4.0.0_BETA.
* Issue 22: term vectors could not be accessed if a field was not stored. Fixed
also several other wrong assumptions about field flags.
You might try that one.
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 08:10 +0100, Bernd Fehling wrote:
> I think there is already a BETA available:
> http://luke.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
> You might try that one.
That doesn't work either for Lucene 4.0.0 indexes, same for source
trunk. I did have some luck with downloading the source and cha
15 matches
Mail list logo
