Hi, i added the follow dependancy to Apache Nutch:
org="org.apache.solr" name="solr-solrj" rev="4.0.0"
-Original message-
> From:Lance Norskog
> Sent: Sat 03-Nov-2012 04:34
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; markrmil...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: trouble instantiating CloudSolrServer
>
Hi - yes, i should be able to make sense out of them next monday. I assume
you're not too interested in the OOM machine but all surrounding nodes that
blocked instead?
-Original message-
> From:Mark Miller
> Sent: Sat 03-Nov-2012 03:14
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re
Hi all,
I have one machine running solr 3.6. I would like to move this data to
solr 4.0 and set up a solrcloud.
I feel like I should replicate the existing data. After that, it isn't
clear to me what I need to do.
1) Create a slave (4.0) that replicates from the master (3.6).
2) Somehow t
Hi,
Check the archive for a similar Q&A yesterday. Reindexing would be the
cleanest.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Nov 3, 2012 8:22 AM, "Nathan Findley" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have one machine running solr 3.6. I would like to move this data to
> solr 4.0 and set
The OOM machine and any surrounding if possible (eg especially the leader of
the shard).
Not sure what I'm looking for yet, so the more info the better.
- Mark
On Nov 3, 2012, at 5:23 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> Hi - yes, i should be able to make sense out of them next monday. I assume
> you'
On Nov 1, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> File bug?
Please.
- Mark
Likely some of the trunk work around allowing any Directory impl to replicate.
JIRA pls :)
- Mark
On Oct 30, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're testing again with today's trunk and using the new Lucene 4.1 format by
> default. When nodes are not restarted things are kind
I think I've seen it on 4.X as well yesterday. Let's file a JIRA to track
looking into it.
- Mark
On Oct 31, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> That's 5, the actual trunk/
>
> -Original message-
>> From:Mark Miller
>> Sent: Wed 31-Oct-2012 16:29
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.
Nothing I know of - file a bug please. Might be related to the EOF issue, so
you might add the details to that JIRA.
- Mark
On Nov 2, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We wiped clean the data directories for one node. That node is never able to
> recover and regularly runs O
I think there's a change in the behavior of SolrCloud vs. what's in the
wiki, but I was hoping someone could confirm for me. I checked JIRA and
there were a couple of issues requesting partial results if one server
comes down, but that doesn't seem to be the issue here. I also checked
CHANGES
Solr 4.0
I need to return documents when all their keywords are matching the query. In
other words, all the document keywords should match the query keywords
e.g., query: best chinese food restaurant
doc1: chinese food
doc2: italian food
doc3: chinese store
Only doc1 should be returned ("chine
Solr 4.0
I want to avoid the TF.IDF and use a "binary" model, i.e., if the keyword is in
the document, the score is 1, no matter how frequent the keyword is in that
document. If the keyword is not in the document, than the score is zero. I also
want to avoid the idf.
e.g.,
query: pizza
doc:
On 3 November 2012 22:17, SR wrote:
> Solr 4.0
>
> I need to return documents when all their keywords are matching the query.
> In other words, all the document keywords should match the query keywords
>
> e.g., query: best chinese food restaurant
>
> doc1: chinese food
> doc2: italian food
> doc
On 2012-11-03, at 12:55 PM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On 3 November 2012 22:17, SR wrote:
>
>> Solr 4.0
>>
>> I need to return documents when all their keywords are matching the query.
>> In other words, all the document keywords should match the query keywords
>>
>> e.g., query: best chinese foo
Hi,
My site has 30,000 widgets and 500,000 widget users.
I have created two solr indexes, one for widgets and one for users. The
widgets index is 324MB and the users index is 9.3GB.
We are opimizing the index every hour and during this time the server is
slowing to a crawl, looks like due to
I'd recommend not optimizing every hour. Are you seeing a significant
performance increase from optimizing this frequently?
-Michael
Hi,
Look where Similarity implementation is specified in solrconfig.xml. Find
that class in Lucene and you will see tf and idf methods you need for your
implementation, which you can then specify I'm solrconfig. Reindexing
required.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Nov
Hi,
This should become a FAQ. Short version: don't optimize. Check ML archives
for recent messages and explanations.
If you have a monitoring tool, look at disk io during and after
optimization, check solr cache hit rates, etc.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Nov 3, 2
But neither "best" nor "restaurant" are in any of the documents, so how are
any of these documents reasonable matches?
You have the semantics of query backwards. The documents are the "data" and
the query is the "operation" to be performed on the data. The intent of a
query is to specify what
Thanks Jack.
This is not the ultimate goal of my search system; it's only one of the
features I need. I don't need "best" and "restaurant" to match in this feature.
Yes, I do have the semantic of query backwards, and that's what I need in my
application.
-S
On 2012-11-03, at 10:05 PM, Jack K
You really need to spend some time becoming familiar with
1> the results of putting &debugQuery=on in your queries in order to see
how your query terms are spread across various fields.
2> the admin/analysis page to understand field tokenization.
>From your message, it looks like you're confusing
Hi Steve,
I would store my documents as queries in your case. You may find these
relevant.
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0-BETA/memory/org/apache/lucene/index/memory/MemoryIndex.html
http://www.elasticsearch.org/blog/2011/02/08/percolator.html
--- On Sun, 11/4/12, SR wrote:
> From: SR
Thanks Ahmet that's exactly what I need. Do you now whether this feature exists
in Solr? Or do I have to go through Lucene directly?
Thanks,
-SR
On 2012-11-03, at 10:26 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I would store my documents as queries in your case. You may find these
> relevant.
I'm going to go a bit sideways on you, partly because I can't answer the
question ...
But, every time I see someone doing what looks like substituting "core" for
"table" and
then trying to use Solr like a DB, I get on my soap-box and preach..
In this case, consider de-normalizing your DB so y
It doesn't exist in solr. We've built it for clients. Elasticsearch has it
built in.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Nov 3, 2012 10:37 PM, "SR" wrote:
> Thanks Ahmet that's exactly what I need. Do you now whether this feature
> exists in Solr? Or do I have to go throu
Thanks Otis.
By "we" you mean "Lucid works"?
Is there a chance to get it sometime soon in the open source?
Thanks,
-S
On 2012-11-03, at 10:39 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> It doesn't exist in solr. We've built it for clients. Elasticsearch has it
> built in.
>
> Otis
> --
> Performance Monito
SolrCloud doesn't work unless every shard has at least one server that is
up and running.
I _think_ you might be killing both nodes that host one of the shards. The
admin
page has a link showing you the state of your cluster. So when this happens,
does that page show both nodes for that shard bein
27 matches
Mail list logo
