My first question is why this matters? Is this curiosity or is there a real
performance issue you're tracking down?
I don't quite understand when you say "machine A forwards...to machineB".
Are you talking about replication here? Or SolrCloud? Details matter, a lot
DIH has nothing that I know
Sorry guys, it had nothing to do with the DIH's ability to parse attributes. My
xslt did not work with the DIH. I used xsltproc to test my xslt and it worked
great. However the DIH xslt transformation failed. I was able to move some
things around in the xslt to get things working.
Not sur
Here`s the catalina.out contents:
Out 20, 2012 12:55:58 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
locateSolrHome
INFO: using system property solr.solr.home: /home/rogerio/Dados/salutisvitae
Out 20, 2012 12:55:58 PM org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader
INFO: new SolrResourceLoader for deduced
Hey guys,
Just started using Solr 4 and my main use case involves indexing bounding
boxes/polygons. I have a pretty small dataset and am currently using the DIH
(URLDatasource) to index my XML. Part of my XML comes back as minx, miny, maxx,
maxy. Is it possible to index my bbox using the DIH?
Yeah, all this is new, usage tips are often something that
gets done on an "as needed" basis. I've been curious about
per-field codecs, and your post prompted me to create a Wiki page here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleTextCodecExample
Feel free to edit it as you try it out, I find that the
thanks very much Erick! i've missed the "postingsFormat="SimpleText"" part!
now it works as espected on solr4 :-)
i llok forward if to find some user case i could provide to your example,
and if i'll find i'll promise i'll add, thanks
Alfredo
2012/10/20 Erick Erickson
> Yeah, all this is new,
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
There's not nearly enough information here to help you.
Best
Erick
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:06 PM, calmsoul wrote:
> I have a document with name ABC 102030 XYZ and if i search for this document
> with ABC and -"10" then i dont get th
Are you sure you're not just seeing the stored value (which never have
analysis applied?) They're what you get back when you specify fl=blah,blivet
take a look at admin/schema browser and point it it the field to see what's
actually in the index. Or get a copy of Luke,
Otherwise, as Jack says
That'll probably work. Or with Solr 4's new spatial field types you can do a
rectangle query of the whole world: geofieldname:[-90,-180 TO 90,180].
Perhaps it'd be nice to add explicit support for [* TO *].
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
V
You may want to look at realtime NRT for this kind of performance:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3816
You can download realtime NRT integrated with Apache Solr from here:
http://solr-ra.tgels.org
Regards,
- Nagendra Nagarajayya
http://solr-ra.tgels.org
http://rankingalgorithm.tgel
Hi Solr users!
Could any of you tell me how to do a facet count across several cores
excluding duplicates. Eg.
Core A:
Page 1
Id=a
Text=hello world
Page 2
Id=b
Text=hello again
Core B:
Page 1
Id=a
Text=Hej verden
Id=c
Text=Ny besked
Doing a facet count on core A giv
Thank you Amit,
I let you know on monday when at office because I do not have access to solr
from home...
But I guess I missed to use dynamic field in right way, a long time I do not
read my basics ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Easy-question-docs-wi
Indeed, it would be nice we can use [* TO *]
Then, is it possible to deal with the following on solr 3.6:
geofieldname:[-90,-180 TO 90,180]
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Easy-question-docs-with-empty-geodata-field-tp4014751p4014944.html
Sent from the Sol
Hi all,
Quick question. I've been reading up on the filter query and how it's
implemented and the multiple articles I see keep referring to this
notion of leap frogging and filter query execution in parallel with
the main query. Question: Can someone point me to the code that does
this so I can be
I managed to get a setup with a log4j binding working. I modified the
build script so that the dist-war-excl-slf4j target excludes all jars
with slf4j in the name. Then I put jars from the newest versions of
slf4j and log4j into lib/ext under the jetty home. Then I added
-Dlog4j.configuratio
Amit,
Sure. this method
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/trunk/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java#L796beside
some other stuff calculates fq's docset intersection which is
supplied into filtered search call
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/trunk/sol
Thanks. So I was poking through this and see that the filters are
calculated up front and stored as docsets that get intersected and
passed into Lucene in the filter. The question though is that
somewhere in the IndexSearcher and somewhere into the scorer it does
this but I can't quite find where.
Okay I think I found it. Let me know if this makes sense (also for
those curious about this).
1) The IndexSearcher will create a FilteredQuery using the
RANDOM_ACCESS_STRATEGY by default (IndexSearcher#wrapFilter).
2) When the searcher requests the scorer, the FilteredQuery uses the
FilterStrateg
On the surface this looks like you could use the minimum should match
feature of the dismax handler and alter that behavior depending on
whether or not the search is your main search or your fallback search
as you described in your (c) case.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Uma Mahesh wrote:
> Hi
CAVEAT: I am a nubie w/r to SOLR (some Lucene experience, but not SOLR
itself. Trying to come up to speed.
What have you all done w/r to SOLR capacity planning and disaster relief?
I am curious to the following metrics:
- File handles and other ulimit/profile concerns
- Space calculations (p
20 matches
Mail list logo
