If I've understood you correctly, you could achieve this also with the
XSLTResponseWriter, it would be pretty trivial to write an XLST that
exposes the node position in the results, containing:
Stick that in solr/conf/xslt, and reference it with wt=xslt&tr=.xsl
That way you wouldn't need to
Solr has a small query cache, but this does not hold queries for any
length of time, so won't suit your purpose.
The LucidWorks Search product has (I believe) a click tracking feature,
but that is about boosting documents that are clicked on, not specific
search terms. Parsing the Solr log, or pus
Good question. I know xslt could output json, but you'd have to write a
stylesheet that transforms the xml into json. I'm not sure whether you
can influence the content-type for the output with the xslt response
writer though.
There's also the velocity response writer, which sits behind the /brows
Given that Solr does not support distributed IDF, adding a shard without
balancing the number of documents could seriously skew your scoring. If
you are okay with that, then the next question is what happens if you
download the clusterstate.json from ZooKeeper, and add another entry,
along the line
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 08:42 +0200, Torben Honigbaum wrote:
> sorry, my fault. This was one of my first ideas. My problem is, that
> I've 1.000.000 documents, each with about 20 attributes. Additionally
> each document has between 200 and 500 option-value pairs. So if I
> denormalize the data, it me
Hello!
Radim there is a JIRA issue -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3755. It is work in
progress, but once finished Solr will enable you to add additional
shards on a live collection and split the ones that were already
created.
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com
Hi List
We're using Solr-4.0.0-Beta with a 7M document index running on a single
host with 16 shards. We'd like to use an ExternalFileField to hold a value
that changes often. However, we've discovered that the file is apparently
re-read by every shard/core on *every commit*; the index is unrespon
Hi everyone,
I've been playing around with the new spatial search functionalities
included in the newer versions of solr (solr 4.1 and solr trunk 5.0), and
i've found something strange when I try to find a point inside a polygon
(particularly inside a square).
You can reproduce this problem usin
Hi,
There are two servers with the same configuration. I crawl the same URL.
One of them is giving the following error:
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: ERROR:
[doc=http://bilgisayarciniz.org/] multiple values encountered for non
multiValued copy field text: bilgisayarciniz w
Hi,
Please describe your environemnt better
* How do you "crawl", using which crawler?
* To which RequestHandler do you send the docs?
* Which version of Solr
* Can you share your schema and other relevant config with us?
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
hi,
I am unable to unzip the 5883_Code.zip file for solr 1.4 from paktpub site
.I get the error message
End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the
latter case the central directory and zipfil
Hi Jan, thanks for your fast reply. Below is the information you requested:
* I use nutch, using the command "nutch crawl urls -dir crawl-$(date
+%FT%H-%M-%S) -solr http://localhost:8983/solr/ -depth 10 -topN 5"
* What do you mean "which RequestHandler"? How can I find that out?
* 3.6.1
* Both
Hi Jan, thanks for your fast reply. Below is the information you requested:
* I use nutch, using the command "nutch crawl urls -dir crawl-$(date
+%FT%H-%M-%S) -solr http://localhost:8983/solr/ -depth 10 -topN 5"
* What do you mean "which RequestHandler"? How can I find that out?
* 3.6.1
* Both
You shouldn't try copying files around, your comment that you
" tried replacing QueryElevationComponent.java" leads me to
think you tried that. Instead, I notice that there's a SOLR-2949.3x
patch. If you want to try that, you can apply the patch to the 3.x code
line. See "working with patches" at
h
Right, but even if that worked, you'd then get docs being assigned
to the wrong shard. The shard assignment would be something
like (hash(id)/3). So a document currently on shard 0 would be
indexed next time, perhaps, on shard 2, leaving two "live" docs
in your system with the same ID. Bad Things w
Well, the schemas are different. The first schema doesn't have a
copyField directive anywhere in it and the second one does.
And the is in a non-standard place anyway, it's
usually outside the tag. Kind of surprising it works
at all there, now I've got to go figure out why .
Anyway apparent
The Extended Dismax query parser (edismax) mostly "obsoletes" Dismax except
in the sense that some apps prefer the restricted syntax of Dismax:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Kirsch
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 2:32 AM
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 13:08 +0200, Sujatha Arun wrote:
> I am unable to unzip the 5883_Code.zip file for solr 1.4 from paktpub site
> .I get the error message
>
> End-of-central-directory signature not found. [...]
It is a corrupt ZIP-file. I'm guessing you got it from
http://www.packtpub.com/
What release of Solr are you on? Solr 4.0 has improved wildcard support (FST
"automatons".) But even then, such heavy use of wildcards may be
problematic.
If you intend to use wildcard in that manner, you might want to create a
customer stemming filter that does that stemming at index time (an
Hi.
I have a trouble with SOLR configuration. Just want to implement
configuration that would be operate with index like MySQL query: field_name
LIKE '%foo%' AND field_name LIKE '%bar%'.
So, for example, I have 4 indexed titles:
'Kathy Lee',
'Kathy Norris',
'Kathy Davies',
'Kathy Bird'
and with
Thanks for the quick response, I'm trying to get a suggester query, I found odd
the being a very common issue solr doesn't provide any built in mechanism for
query suggestions, but implementing the other components isn't so hard either.
Greetiings!
On Oct 8, 2012, at 3:38 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Hi!
I'm quite new to Solr, I was recently asked to help out on a project where the
previous "Solr-person" quit quite suddenly. I've noticed that some of our
searches don't return the expected result, and I'm hoping you guys can help me
out.
We've indexed a lot of names, and would like to sear
The PositionFilterFactory is probably preventing phrase queries from
working. What are you expecting it to do? It basically means query if all
the quoted terms occur at the same position.
SQL "like" is comparable to Lucene wildcard, but change the "%" to "*" and
"_" to "?".
-- Jack Krupansky
Hi Jorge,
As far as I know, there isn't built-in component to achieve such function
in Solr (maybe in latest 4.1 that I didn't explored in depth yet). However
I've done myself in the past using different approaches.
The first one is similar to Upayavira's suggestion ans uses an independent
index
A regular expression term may provide what you want, but not exactly. Maybe
something like:
/(ch|k)r.*/
(No guarantee that will actually work.)
See:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_0_0-BETA/queryparser/org/apache/lucene/queryparser/classic/package-summary.html#Regexp_Searches
And probably slo
I have also just ran into this a few times over the weekend in a newly
deployed system. We are running Solr 4.0 Beta (not using SolrCloud) and it
is hosted via AWS.
I have a RabbitMQ consumer that reads updates from a queue and posts
updates to Solr via SolrJ. There is quite a bit of error handlin
Thank you very much!
I've singlelined, spaced removed every fl field in my solrconfig and now
the app works fine
Giovanni
Il 05/10/12 20:49, Chris Hostetter ha scritto:
: So extracting the attachment you will be able to track down what appens
:
: this is the query that shows the error, and b
Disabling PositionFilterFactory is totally break multiword search, and I
could find titles only by single word.
Default solr.TextField field with WhitespaceTokenizerFactory returns only
complete words match, enabling NGramFilterFactory for that field doesn't do
anything for me. If I use field desc
whether phonetic filters can be multiterm aware:
I'd be leery of this, as I basically don't quite know how that would
behave. You'd have to insure that the algorithms changed the
first parts of the words uniformly, regardless of what followed. I'm
pretty sure that _some_ phonetic algorithms do no
Also note there were no exceptions in the actual Solr log, only on the
SolrJ side.
Thanks,
Briggs
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Briggs Thompson <
w.briggs.thomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have also just ran into this a few times over the weekend in a newly
> deployed system. We are running Solr
Toke,
You are absolutely right, concatenating term is a possible solution. I
found faceting is quite complicated in this case, but it was a hot fix
which we delivered to production.
Torben,
This problem arise quite often, beside of these two approaches discussed
there, also possible to approach Sp
Martin,
Can you tell me what's the content of that field, and how it should affect
search result?
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Martin Koch wrote:
> Hi List
>
> We're using Solr-4.0.0-Beta with a 7M document index running on a single
> host with 16 shards. We'd like to use an ExternalFileFie
Hi,
Consider looking into synonyms and ngrams.
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Oct 8, 2012 11:21 AM, "Hågen Pihlstrøm Hasle"
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm quite new to Solr, I was recently asked to help out on a project where
> the previous "Solr-person" quit quite suddenly.
: Regarding https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-758 (Enhance
: DisMaxQParserPlugin to support full-Solr syntax and to support alternate
: escaping strategies.)
FWIW: i'm not really sure what/how that issue relates to the problem you
are seeing (or how you *think* it relates to hte problem
did get some files by jar unpacking ,but could not get the ones I wanted
...thanks anyway !!
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 13:08 +0200, Sujatha Arun wrote:
> > I am unable to unzip the 5883_Code.zip file for solr 1.4 from paktpub
> site
> > .I get
I guess synonyms would give me a similar result as using regexes, like Jack
wrote about.
I've thought about that, but I don't think it would be good enough.
Substituting "k" for "ch" is easy enough, but the problem is that I have to
think of every possible substitution in advance. I'd like
Do it as it is done in cassandra database. Adding new node and
redistributing data can be done in live system without problem it looks
like this:
every cassandra node has key range assigned. instead of assigning keys
to nodes like hash(key) mod nodes, then every node has its portion of
hash k
AKA Consistent Hashing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistent_hashing
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions
18 East 41st Street, 2nd Floor
New York, NY 10017-6271
www.appinions.com
Where Influence Isn’t a Game
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Radim K
I understand that I'm quickly reaching the boundaries of my Solr-competence
when I'm supposed to read about "Expert Level" concepts.. :) I had already
read it once, but now I read it again. Twice. And I'm not sure if I understand
it correctly.. So let me ask a follow-up question:
If I define
On 9/28/2012 9:09 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
I am planning and building up a test system with Solr 4.0, for my
eventual upgrade. I have not made a lot of progress so far, but I
have come across a potential problem.
It's been over a week with no response to this. Please see the original
email f
To answer your first question, yes, you've got it right. If you define
a multiterm section in your fieldType, whatever you put in that section
gets applied whether the underlying class is MultiTermAware or not.
Which means you can shoot yourself in the foot really bad ...
Well, you have 6 or so po
Sure: We're boosting search results based on user actions which could be
e.g. the number of times a particular document has been read. In future,
we'd also like to boost by e.g. impressions (the number of times a document
has been displayed) and other values.
/Martin
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:02 P
I'm trying to find documents using this query:
field:"value" OR (*:* AND NOT field:[* TO *])
Which means, either field is set to "value" or the field does not exist in
the document.
I'm running this for ~20 fields in a single query strung together with
ANDs. The query time is high, averaging aro
I am doing a facet query in Solr (3.4) and getting very bad performance.
This is in a solr shard with 22 million records, but I am specifically doing
a small time slice. However even if I take the time slice query out it
takes the same amount of time, so it seems to be searching the entire data
s
Faceting at that scale takes time to "warm up". If you've got your caches and
such configured appropriately, then successive searches will be very fast,
however you'll still need to do the cache warming (depends on the faceting
implementation you're using, in this case you're probably using the
Facets are only really useful if you want the counts for multiple values (e.g.,
"eldudearino", "ladudearina"). I'd suggest just leaving all the facet
parameters off of that query - the numFound that is returned should give you
what you want.
The slowness may be due to the facet cache needing to
Martin,
I have kind of hack approach in mind regarding hiding document from search.
So, it's a little bit easier than your task. I'm going to deliver talk
about it http://www.apachecon.eu/schedule/presentation/89/ .
Frankly speaking, there is no reliable out-of-the-box solution for it. I
saw that
: a small time slice. However even if I take the time slice query out it
: takes the same amount of time, so it seems to be searching the entire data
: set.
a) you might try using facet.method=enum - in some special cases it may be
faster then the default (facet.method=fc).
: I am trying to fi
> field:"value" OR (*:* AND NOT field:[* TO *])
>
> Which means, either field is set to "value" or the field
> does not exist in
> the document.
Instead of field:[* TO *], you can define a default value in schema.xml. Or
DefaultValueUpdateProcessorFactory in solrconfig.
With this, "the field do
Thanks for all the replies.
I oversimplified the problem for the purposes of making my post small and
concise. I am really trying to find the counts of documents by a list of 10
different authors that match those keywords. Of course on looking up a
single author there is no reason to do a facet
Hi,
We're using Solr 4.0 and servicing patent search.
Patent search intends to very complex queries including wildcard.
I think Ngram or EdgeNgram filter is alternative.
But every terms included a query don't have wildcard.
So we can't use that filter.
If I make empty core and use in main core th
On 10/8/2012 4:09 PM, kevinlieb wrote:
Thanks for all the replies.
I oversimplified the problem for the purposes of making my post small and
concise. I am really trying to find the counts of documents by a list of 10
different authors that match those keywords. Of course on looking up a
single
Hi Kevin,
Right, it's the very frequent commits, most likely. Change commits
to, say, every 60 or 120 seconds and compare the performance. I think
you guys use SPM, so check the Cache graphs (hit % specifically)
before and after the above change.
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/s
Hi,
Qs:
* Have you tried StreamingUpdateSolrServer?
* Newever version of Solr(J)?
When things hang, jstack your app that uses SolrJ and Solr a few times
and you should be able to see where they are stuck.
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Moni
Hi,
We've explored this with a few clients a while back. If I remember
correctly, this doesn't make much difference and I don't expect it
will make any noticable difference for you since all your cores are on
that same 1 server. If you had 1 server with more CPU cores you would
see better number
Hi Martin,
Perhaps you could make a small change in Solr to add "don't reload EFF
if it hasn't been modified since it was last opened". I assume you
commit pretty often, but don't modify EFF files that often, so this
could save you some needless loading. That said, I'd be surprised EFF
doesn't a
I'm quite new in SOLR, I have a question regarding the request for data
importer.
In my data-config.xml, i have something like this
However, everytime I execute delta-import (/dataimport?command=delta-import),
it always gives me exception like this:
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException:
Lance,
this is the kind of fun that happens with Velocity all day long...
In general, when it outputs the variable name, it's the that the variable is
null; this can happen when a method is missing for example
There are actually effective uses of this brain-dead-debugger-oriented-practice!
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Briggs Thompson
wrote:
> I am running into an issue of a multithreaded SolrJ client application used
> for indexing is getting into a hung state. I responded to a separate thread
> earlier today with someone that had the same error, see
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nab
59 matches
Mail list logo
