> After investigating more, here is the tomcat log herebelow. It is
indeed the same problem: "exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2,".
could not be solr able to close oldest warming searcher and replace it
by new one?
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Radim Kolar wrote:
>> After investigating more, here is the tomcat log herebelow. It is indeed
>> the same problem: "exceeded limit of maxWarmingSearchers=2,".
>
> could not be solr able to close oldest warming searcher and replace it by
> new one?
That approach
Otis,
If you are doing Named Entity Recognition, you may want to look at the
research area concerned with Named Entity Recognition. :-) In general,
there is inline markup and standoff markup. You seem to be going for
standoff/stand-alone markup. I am not clear though whether it is just
'discovery'
Hi,
I m also facing same issue while using suggester (working in c#.net).
Below is my configurations.
suggest/?q="michael ja"
---
Response :
-
-
0
1
-
-
-
Add &debugQuery=true to your query request and look at the "explain"
section. The scores will indicate why a document ranks as it does.
When you say that your query was "Energy Field", was that a quoted phrase or
just two keywords? I assume the latter. I also assume that you were using
the "OR
Either setup a load balancer, or use the SolrCloud solrj client
CloudSolrServer - it takes a comma separated list of zk servers rather
than a solr url.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:17 PM, andy wrote:
> I know fail over is available in solr4.0 right now, if one server
> crashes,other servers also su
Hi,
Im Using Solr 3.6.1 version and I have a field which is having values like
A|B|C
B|C|D|EE
A|C|B
A|B|D
..etc..
So, When I search for "A|B", I should get documents starting with
"A" and "A|B"
To implement this, I've used PathHierarchyTokenizer for the above field as
But,
Hi all,
I have a solr index with 5,000,000 documents and my index size is 38GB. But
when I query for about 400,000 documents based on certain criteria, solr
searches it really quickly but does not return data for close to 2 minutes.
The unique key field is the only field i am requesting for. Also,
Isn't XSLT the bottleneck here?
I have not yet met an incremental XSLT processor, although I heard XSLT 1
claimed it could be done in principle.
If you start to do this kind of processing, I think you have no other choice
than write your own output method.
Paul
Le 12 sept. 2012 à 15:47, Rohit
Hi All,
Would just like to verify if Solr 4.0 Beta has been released. Does the
following url give the official beta release:
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/solr/4.0.0-BETA
--
Regards,
Samarth
Have you tried asking for CSV as an output format? Then, you don't
have any XML wrappers and you will get your IDs one per line. I tried
it with returning about 40 rows and it was just fine.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/al
--- On Wed, 9/12/12, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> From: Dotan Cohen
> Subject: Solr unique key can't be blank
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2012, 5:06 PM
> Consider this simple schema:
>
>
>
>
> name="uuid" class="solr.UUIDField" indexed="true" />
Yes, it has been released. Read the details here (including download
instructions/links):
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/solrnews.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: samarth s
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:54 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 4.0 Beta
Actually at my company, we do a lot of NLP work and we've ended up
using bespoke formats, formerly a FeatureStructure serialized to JSON,
but most recently in protobufs. Possibly not the answer you were
looking for, Otis, but at least it's a datapoint.
Michael Della Bitta
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> Hi Dotan,
>
> Did you define the following update processor chain in solrconfig.xml ?
> And did you reference it in an update handler?
>
>
>
> id
>
>
>
>
Thank you Ahmet! In fact, I did not know that the
updateRequestPr
Do not run optimize. It is not necessary. Solr continually optimizes in the
background.
wunder
On Sep 11, 2012, at 11:15 PM, Nikhil Chhaochharia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using a recent nightly of Solr 4 and have setup a simple SolrCloud
> cluster of 2 shards without any replicas. If I send the
The UniqueKey wiki was recently updated to indicate this new Solr 4.0
requirement:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UniqueKey
"in Solr 4, this field must be populated via
solr.UUIDUpdateProcessorFactory"
The changes you were given are contained on that updated wiki page.
-- Jack Krupansky
-
> Thank you Ahmet! In fact, I did not know that the
> updateRequestProcessorChain needed to be defined in
> solrconfig.xml and
> I had tried to define it in schema.xml. I don't have access
> to
> solrconfig.xml (I am using Websolr) but I will contact them
> about
> adding it.
Please not that you n
could not be solr able to close oldest warming searcher and replace it by
new one?
That approach can easily lead to starvation (i.e. you never get a new
searcher usable for queries).
It will not. If there is more then 1 warming searcher. Look at this schema:
1. current in use searcher
2. 1st
Hi,
I am trying to connect with authenticated solr instance. I have added latest
solrnet .dll but getting authentication issue. Please Suggest me where i
did wrong.
ISolrOperations oSolrOperations = null;
const string core0url = "http://localhost:8080/solr/products";;
const string co
Hi,
I defined a field "id" in my schema.xml and use it as an :
id
I want to store URLs with a prefix in this field to be sure that every id is
unique among websites. For example:
domain_http://www.domain.com/?p=12345
foo_http://foo.com
bar_http://bar.com/?doc=452
I wrote a Java app, w
Use delimiter option instead of pattern for PathHierarchyTokenizerFactory:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.PathHierarchyTokenizerFactory
koji
--
http://soleami.com/blog/starting-lab-work.html
(12/09/12 22:22), mechravi25 wrote:
Hi,
Im Using Solr 3.6.1 version
Hi,
Exists the possibility of do a distinct group count in a grouping done using
a sharding schema?
This issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3436 make a fixe in
the way to sum all groups returned in a distributed grouping operation, but
not always we want the sum, in some cases is i
Hello,
term query parser is your friend in this case. With this you don't need to
escape anything.
SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
query.setQuery("{!term f=id}bar_http://bar.com/?doc=452";);
--- On Wed, 9/12/12, sy...@web.de wrote:
> From: sy...@web.de
> Subject: Cannot parse ":", using
Hello,
I am working on solr authentication with the help of solrnet dll and
windsolr container getting some issue. Please suggest me and provide me some
link this will be very helpful for me.
-
Regards,
Suneel Pandey
Sr. Software Developer
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.47
Hi Folks,
I'm going to setup a SOLR search server for the first time. Hope you don't
mind a few beginner questions. Perhaps a quick summary of how I intend to use
it will help.
The SOLR server will be installed on a single VPS host and bound to a
internal IP (192.168.?.?). Search pa
Hello All,
Sometimes (in a random manner) I get the following when I reply a post :
"Hi. This is the deliver program at zju.edu.cn.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
new...@zju.edu.cn
Thank you!
It seems to me that I managed to get it work.
Just for future reference short I attach source code. The jar should be placed
under core/lib folder:
Please let me know if you have any comments or if I got sth incorrect...
public class PrecedenceQParserPlugin extends QParserPlugin {
Distinct in a distributed environment would require de-duplication
en-masse, use Hive or MapReduce instead.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:53 AM, yriveiro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Exists the possibility of do a distinct group count in a grouping done using
> a sharding schema?
>
> This issue https://issues.a
I get the same thing, after nearly every email I send directly to the
lucene/solr lists (as opposed to auto-sent JIRA posts).
I don't think it delays my messages though.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:24 PM
T
> term query parser is your friend in this case. With this you don't need to
> escape anything.
> SolrQuery query = new SolrQuery();
> query.setQuery("{!term f=id}bar_http://bar.com/?doc=452";);
But how can I *store* a document with an URL as a field value ? E.g.
"domain_http://www.domain.co
my bad, using "term query parser" works, thanks ahmet.
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. September 2012 um 19:40 Uhr
> Von: sy...@web.de
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Aw: Re: Cannot parse ":", using HTTP-URL as id
>
> > term query parser is your friend in this case. With this you don't nee
Hi ,
If I am looking to implement Suggester Implementation with 3.6.1 ,I beleive
this creates it own index , now If I want to also use the spellcheck also
,would it be using the same index as suggester?
Regards
Sujatha
> Should I go with Beta 4 or stable 3?
I would use solr 4, since this is first time installation.
> Which servlet container would you suggest is
> the most efficient for my implementation?
Folks use both jetty and tomcat.
> I'm unclear if the JDK is required or I can
> just install
I would start with version 4, hands down.
I started with Solr 4 alpha and has moved to beta. Final can't be too
far behind. So far, it has been extremely stable for me.
And unless you are going into production in a next week, it will
probably be final while you are learning.
Regards,
Alex.
Pe
Hi Sujatha,
No, suggester and spellchecker are separate beasts.
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Sujatha Arun wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> If I am looking to implement S
Same here. Changed subject to attract more attention.
Otis
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> I get the same thing, after nearly every email I send directly to the
> lucene/solr lists (as opposed to auto-sent JIRA posts).
>
> I don't think it delays my messages though.
>
>
> I am indexing data with Solr Cell,
> using mainly the code from here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ContentStreamUpdateRequestExample
>
> But in my Solr server i got the TikaException followed by a
> solrexception
> in my solrj programm.
>
> Is there a way to suppress this and similar excepti
Hello everyone, I'm working on an e-commerce website and using Solr as my
Search Engine, im really enjoying its funcionality and the search
options/performance.
But i am stucky in a kinda tricky cenario... That what happens:
I Have a medicine web-store, where i indexed all necessary products in
You may be able to do this with grouping. Group on the medicine "family", and
only show the Original if there are multiple items in the family.
wunder
On Sep 12, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Gustav wrote:
> Hello everyone, I'm working on an e-commerce website and using Solr as my
> Search Engine, im reall
You could implement a custom "search component" with that logic, if you
don't mind the complexity of writing Java code that runs inside the Solr
environment. Otherwise, just implement that logic in your app. Or, or
implement an "app server" which sits between Solr and your app.
http://wiki.apa
is there a way for solr to tell me what fields the query matched,
other then turning debug on?
I'd like my application to take different actions based on what fields
were matched.
--
Dan Foley
Owner - PHP Web Developer
___
Micamedia.com - PHP W
What about using the FastVectorHighlighter? It should get you what
you're looking for (fields with matches) without much of a query-time
performance impact.
--Casey
On 9/12/12 3:01 PM, Dan Foley wrote:
> is there a way for solr to tell me what fields the query matched,
> other then turning debug
There's a good intro to atomic updates here:
http://yonik.com/solr/atomic-updates/ but it does not describe how to
structure the updates using xml.
Anyone have any idea on how these would look?
Thanks! Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-post-atomic-
Figured it out.
in JSON:
{"id" : "book1",
"author" : {"set":"Neal Stephenson"}
}
in XML:
book1
This seems to work.
Jim
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-post-atomic-updates-using-xml-tp4007323p4007325.html
Sent from the Solr - User mai
But presumably "matched" fields relates to indexed fields, which might not
have stored values.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Casey Callendrello
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 6:15 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can solr return matched fields?
Does anyone want me to send them a white paper on having a
multi-datacenter environment with Solr?
Best,
Stephanie
Is that with plain Apache Solr or Datastax?
Otis
--
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm
On Sep 12, 2012 7:55 PM, "Stephanie Huynh" wrote:
> Does anyone want me to send them a white paper on having a
> multi-datacenter environment with Solr?
>
> Best,
> Stephanie
>
Hi,
I have been studying how server software responds to requests that cause
CPU overloads (such as infinite loops).
In my experiments I have observed that Solr performs unusually well when
subjected to such loads. Every other piece of web software I've
experimented with drops to zero service und
Hm, I'm not sure how to approach this. Solr is not alone here - there's
container like jetty, solr inside it and lucene inside solr.
Next, that index is rally small, so there is no disk IO. The request
rate is also not super high and if you did this over a fast connection then
there are also no
If the fact that it's "original" vs "generic" is a field "is_original"
0/1 can you sort by is_original? Similarly, could you put a huge boost
on is_original in the dismax so that document matches on is_original
score higher than those that aren't original? Or is your goal to not
show generics *at a
Cool,Thanks Mark!
Mark Miller-3 wrote
>
> Either setup a load balancer, or use the SolrCloud solrj client
> CloudSolrServer - it takes a comma separated list of zk servers rather
> than a solr url.
>
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:17 PM, andy wrote:
>> I know fail over is available in so
Dan,
if you have "foo bar" search phrase against field: NAME, BRAND, and you
have 10K docs matched and 100 first ones is displayed, what do you actually
want to see as "fields the query matched" and for which docs?
looking forward for additional details.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Jack Kru
I forgot to mention that I am using Solr 3.6 .
Laurent
2012/9/12 Laurent Vaills
> Hi,
>
> When I index a document in Solr, I do not commit immediately after, I use
> the autoCommit feature.
> But I would like to know in which index's version the document will be
> available. Is that possible to
Thanks a lot koji. It worked.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Doubts-in-PathHierarchyTokenizer-tp4007216p4007373.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
55 matches
Mail list logo