Normalising the data is a good idea, and it would be easy to do since I would
only have around 50,000 entires BUT it is a bit complicated with addresses I
think. Lets say I store the data in this form:
London, England
Swindon, Wiltshire, England
Wiltshire England
England
What happens if someone
Hi Kalyan,
that is becouse SolrJ uses "javabin" as format which has class version numbers
in the serialized objects that do not match. Set the format to XML ("wt"
parameter) and it will work (maybe JSON would, as well).
Chantal
Am 31.07.2012 um 20:50 schrieb Manepalli, Kalyan:
> Hi all,
>
I want to implement an auto completion search with solr using NGrams. If the
user is searching for names of employees, then auto completion should be
applied. ie.,
if types "j" then need to show the names starts with "j" if types "ja" then
need to show the names starts with "ja" if types "jac" th
All,
We have a requirement, where we need to implement 2 fields as Facetable,
but the values of the fields should not be Searchable.
Please let me know is this feature Supported in Solr If yes what would be
the Configuration to be done in Schema.xml and Solrconfig.xml to achieve
the same.
This i
On 01.08.2012 13:58, jayakeerthi s wrote:
We have a requirement, where we need to implement 2 fields as Facetable,
but the values of the fields should not be Searchable.
Simply don't search for it, then it's not searchable.
Or do I simply don't understand your question? As long as Dismax doesn
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:58 AM, jayakeerthi s wrote:
> We have a requirement, where we need to implement 2 fields as Facetable,
> but the values of the fields should not be Searchable.
The user fields "uf" feature of the edismax parser may work for you:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax
Your configuration of the fieldtype looks quite ok.
In what field are you searching? "text"? " empname " ? "autocomplete_text"?
If you are searching in "autocomplete_text " how do you add content to it? Is
there another copyfield statement? If you are searching in "text" what
fieldtype has that
hi
We would like to turn off TF for a field but we still want to use fast
vector highlighter.
How would we do that?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/termFrequncy-off-and-still-use-fastvector-highlighter-tp3998590.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list a
The "indexed" and "stored" field attributes are independent, so you can
define a facet field as "stored" but not "indexed" (stored="true"
indexed="false"), so that the field can be faceted but not indexed.
In addition, you can also use a copyField to copy the original values for an
indexed fie
On 01.08.2012 15:40, Jack Krupansky wrote:
The "indexed" and "stored" field attributes are independent, so you can
define a facet field as "stored" but not "indexed" (stored="true"
indexed="false"), so that the field can be faceted but not indexed.
?
A field must be indexed to be used for face
Oops. Obviously facet fields must be indexed. Not sure what I was thinking
at the moment.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Michael Kuhlmann
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 8:54 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Urgent: Facetable but not Searchable Field
On 01
Hi all,
I'm playing around with SolrCloud and followed indications I found at
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCloud/
- Started Instance 1 with embedded zk
- Started Instances 2 3 and 4 using Instance 1 as zk server.
Everything works fine.
Then, using CoreAdmin, I add a secon
Hi,
how can I map these complex Datastructure in Solr?
Document
- Groups
- Group_ID
- Group_Name
- .
- Title
- Chapter
- Chapter_Title
- Chapter_Content
Or
Product
- Groups
- Group_ID
- Group_Name
- .
The general rule is to flatten the structures. You have a choice between
sharing common fields between tables, such as "title", or adding a
prefix/suffix to qualify them, such as "document_title" vs. "product_title".
You also have the choice of storing different tables in separate Solr
cores/c
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:34 PM, roz dev wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am using Solr 4 from trunk and using it with Tomcat 6. I am noticing that
> when we are indexing lots of data with 16 concurrent threads, Heap grows
> continuously. It remains high and ultimately most of the stuff ends up
> being moved
It may have something to do with SOLR-3425, but I'm not that sure it fits.
I made some more tests.
Case 1 : with SolrCloud
I can create a new core on one of the server by the admin GUI or by CREATE
directive in URL. The data folder is created (but no conf folder, I believe zk
conf is used). How
I have a field type like the following:
This type is behaving differently in Solr 3.3 and 3.6. In 3.3, the following
doesn't return any records because there is no author called 'Gerri Killis'.
But there is an author called ''Gerri Jonathan'.
/sele
Thanks for the answer.
Ich have to explain, where the problem is...
you may have at the shop solutions products and articles.
The product is the parent of all articles...
in json...
{
"product_name": "tank top",
"article_list": [
{
"color": "red",
"pri
Sorry, that did not explain the problem, just more info about data
layout. What are you actually trying to get out of SOLR?
Are you saying you want parent's details repeated in every entry? Are
you saying that you want to be able to find entries and from there,
being able to find specific parent.
hm ok I think i have to write my example data and the queries I want
to make + the response I expect...
Data:
{
"product_id": "xyz76",
"product_name": "tank top",
"brand": "adidas",
"description":"this is the long description of the product",
"short_descrip
Hi Folks,
I am using Solr 3.4 and my document schema has attributes - title,
transcript, author_name. Presently, I am using DisMax to search for a user
query across transcript. I would also like to do an exact search on
author_name so that for a query "Albert Einstein", I would want to get all
the
Hello all,
I am running 4.0 alpha and have encountered something I am unable to
explain. I am indexing content to a master server, and the data is
replicating to a slave. The odd part is that when searching through the UI,
no documents show up on master with a standard *:* query. All cache types
a
Hi ,
I use solr as search engine for our application. WE have a title "Pandora's
star". When I give a query as
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=pandora's star&spellcheck=true
&spellcheck.collate=true
I get response as below,
-
-
-
1
10
17
-
pandora's
tex
Could your autocommit in the master be using "openSearcher=false"? If you
go to the Master admin, do you see that the searcher has all the segments
that you see in the filesystem?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Briggs Thompson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am running 4.0 alpha and have encountere
I noticed, escape character which is in the query, is getting ignored in solr
3.6.
For the following 3.3 gives results where 'Featuring Chimp' is matched. But
in 3.6, it gives results where Featuring or Chimp or Featuring Chimp is
matched. Any idea what is the difference between my 3.3 and 3.6 env
That is the problem. I wasn't aware of that new feature in 4.0. Thanks for
the quick response Tomás.
-Briggs
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe wrote:
> Could your autocommit in the master be using "openSearcher=false"? If you
> go to the Master admin, do you see that the sea
Which query parser do you have set in your request handler?
There was a problem with edismax in 3.6 with the WordDelimiterFilter, that
sounds exactly like your symptom. The workaround is to enclose the term in
quotes (to make it a phrase), otherwise the terms would be "OR"ed rather
than "AND"e
Jack, thanks a lot for your reply. We are using LuceneQParser query parser. I
agree, if I phrase the string by adding double quotes, I am good.
But I am checking if there is any fix for this without changing the query.
As we are in production environment, we need to change the quries in
different
This may simply be a matter of changing the default query operator from "OR"
to "AND". Try adding &q.op=AND to your request.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: raonalluri
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:26 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: StandardTokenizerFac
Try edismax with the PF2 option, which will automatically boost documents
that contains occurrences of adjacent terms as you have suggested.
See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Pranav Prakash
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 1:21
Thanks Robert for these inputs.
Since we do not really Snowball analyzer for this field, we would not use
it for now. If this still does not address our issue, we would tweak thread
pool as per eks dev suggestion - I am bit hesitant to do this change yet as
we would be reducing thread pool which c
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 7:53 AM, roz dev wrote:
> Thanks Robert for these inputs.
>
> Since we do not really Snowball analyzer for this field, we would not use
> it for now. If this still does not address our issue, we would tweak thread
> pool as per eks dev suggestion - I am bit hesitant to do th
32 matches
Mail list logo
