Hi,
We're running Apache Solr v3.1 and SolrJ is our client.
We're passing multiple Arbitrary Faceting Query (facet.query) to get the
number of matching documents (the facet count) evaluated over the search
results in a *single* Solr query. My use case demands the actual matching
facet results/do
> Can anyone give me some general advice or pointers for
> setting up such an index that enforces user access
> permissions for this type of file/folder search?
May be you can make use of http://manifoldcf.apache.org/en_US/index.html
Hello,
I am new to Solr and I running some tests with our data in Solr. We are
using version 3.6 and the data is imported form a DB2 database using Solr's
DIH. We have defined a single entity in the db-data-config.xml, which is an
equivalent of the following query:
This might lead to some names
> I came across a problem where one of
> my column is multivalued. eg: value can
> be (11,22) (11,33) (11,55) , (22,44) , (22,99)
>
> I want to perform a grouping operation that will yield:
>
> * 11 : count 3
> * 22 : count 3
> * 33 : 1
> * 44 : 1
> * 55 : 1
> * 99 : 1
Ac
--- On Fri, 7/13/12, stockii wrote:
> From: stockii
> Subject: DIH include Fieldset in query
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Friday, July 13, 2012, 11:42 AM
> hello..
>
> i have many big entities in my data-config.xml. in the many
> entities is the
> same query.
> the entities look
Dear Solr users,
I try to run solr/ with tomcat but I have always this error:
Can't find resource 'schema.xml' in classpath or
'/home/solr/apache-solr-3.6.0/example/solr/./conf/', cwd='/var/lib/tomcat6
but schema.xml is inside the directory
'/home/solr/apache-solr-3.6.0/example/solr/./conf/'
If I recall properly, MCF had a proposed patch in this area that was never
fully accepted by the community. The LucidWorks Enterprise product has
support for "search filters for access control" as well:
http://lucidworks.lucidimagination.com/display/lweug20/Search+Filters+for+Access+Control
Th
I found the problem I think, It was a permission problem on the schema.xml
schema.xml was only readable by the solr user.
Now I have the same problem with the solr index directory
Le 14/07/2012 14:00, Bruno Mannina a écrit :
Dear Solr users,
I try to run solr/ with tomcat but I have always th
same problem.
but here should tomcat6 have the right to read/write your index.
regards
vadim
2012/7/14 Bruno Mannina :
> I found the problem I think, It was a permission problem on the schema.xml
>
> schema.xml was only readable by the solr user.
>
> Now I have the same problem with the solr inde
So this got me close
facet.field=testfield&facet.field=%7B!key=mylabel%7Dtestfield&f.mylabel.limit=1
but the limit on the alias didn't seem to work. Is this expected?
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> I am looking to facet on a field in more than one way. My data is of
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
> So this got me close
>
> facet.field=testfield&facet.field=%7B!key=mylabel%7Dtestfield&f.mylabel.limit=1
>
> but the limit on the alias didn't seem to work. Is this expected?
Per-field params don't currently look under the alias. I believ
Yes, I actually do a backup of my index before changing/testing chgrp
action.
As I'm a newbie on Linux, is it the right commands:
sudo chgrp tomcat6 /solrindex
sudo chmod g+s /solrindex
?
Le 14/07/2012 15:31, Vadim Kisselmann a écrit :
same problem.
but here should tomcat6 have the right to
Le 14/07/2012 16:37, Bruno Mannina a écrit :
As I'm a newbie on Linux, is it the right commands:
sudo chgrp tomcat6 /solrindex
If I do this command line, no change has been done?!
For solrindex/
Before I have: solr:solr
After I have: solr:solr
??
chgrp has no action?!
If I use nautilus (with sudo)
I have the list of User and the list of Group but when I choose tomcat6,
instantanly the selection change to "solr"
and I can't modify it
Help please,
Bruno
Le 14/07/2012 20:03, Bruno Mannina a écrit :
Le 14/07/2012 16:37, Bruno Mannina a écrit :
As I'm a newbi
humm it seems to be a NTFS problem because it's a external HDD that I
use also with Windows
Le 14/07/2012 20:11, Bruno Mannina a écrit :
If I use nautilus (with sudo)
I have the list of User and the list of Group but when I choose
tomcat6, instantanly the selection change to "solr"
and I can
I referred https://github.com/evolvingweb/ajax-solr/wiki/reuters-tutorial
for Ajax-Solr setup.
I want to know that although ajax-solr is running but it's searching under
only reuters data. If I want to crawl the web using nutch and integrate it
with solr,then i have to replace solr's schema.xml
I have been experiencing out of memory errors when indexing via solrj into a
4 alpha cluster. It seems when I delegate commits to the server (either
auto commit or commit within) there is nothing to throttle the solrj clients
and the server struggles to fan out the work. However, when I handle
co
With the file manager system, the users don’t have an account on the server
itself. They have user accounts stored in a MySQL database and all permissions
are tied to the user id from the database. I don’t know if this complicates
things at all, but I thought I’d throw that out there in case any
Can you give more info? How much RAM are you giving Solr with Xmx?
Can you be more specific about the behavior you are seeing with auto commit vs
client commit?
How often are you trying to commit? With the client? With auto commit?
Are you doing soft commits? Std commits? A mix?
What's the s
I know there are a variety of people out there already using SolrCloud - some
are testing and investigating, others are already in production. I don't know
many details about these installs though.
Could anyone that is able/willing share details about your SolrCloud
experience/setup?
I'm ver
> Can you give more info? How much RAM are you giving Solr with Xmx?
RHEL 5.4
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02, mixed mode)
java -Xmx16384m -Xms8192m
SOLR shards=6, each with a replica (i.e. total 12 JVMs)
Solrj multi-threaded c
Gotta admit it's a bit puzzling, and surely you want to move to the 3x
versions ..
But at a guess, things might be getting confused on the slaves given
you have a merge policy on them. There's no reason to have any
policies on the slaves; slaves should just be about copying the files
from the mast
What do you get when you attach &debugQuery=on? That should show you the parsed
query. You might paste that.
Erick
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:14 AM, davidbougearel
wrote:
> Ok well i know about the complexity that i can put into fq with AND and OR
> conditions but at the moment when i put fq=user
I think in 4.0 you can, but not 3.x as I remember. Your example has
the fl as part
of the highlight though, is that a typo?
Best
Erick
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 5:21 AM, maurizio1976
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have 2 fields, one containing a string (product) and another containing a
> boolean (show_product)
what version of Solr are you using? There's been quite a bit of work
on this lately,
I'm not even sure how much has made it into 3.6. You might try searching the
JIRA list, Martijn van Groningen has done a bunch of work lately, look for
his name. Fortunately, it's not likely to get a bunch of false
Really hard to say. Try executing your query on the cores with
&debugQuery=on and compare the parsed results (for this you
can probably just ignore the explain bits of the output, concentrate
on the parsed query).
Best
Erick
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> I'm having t
Sorting requires an array of 4-byte ints, one for each document. If
the field is a number or date, this is the only overhead. 80M docs * 4
bytes = 320 mbytes for each sorted field. If it is something else like
a string, Lucene also creates an array with one of every unique value.
If your query res
Hi All,
Is this issue fixed in solr 3.6 or 4.0: Faceting on all Dynamic field
with facet.field=*_s
Link : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247
If it is not fixed, any suggestion on how do I achieve this?
My requirement is just same as this one :
http://lucene.472066.n3.n
As far as I can tell, using field collapsing prevents the use of the
queryResultCache from being checked. It's important for our application to
have both. There are threads on incorporating custom hit collectors which
seems like it could be a way to implement the simplified collapsing I need
(just
29 matches
Mail list logo
