Done see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3541
On 12-6-2012 18:39, Sami Siren wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Thijs wrote:
Hi
I just checked out and build solr&lucene from branches/lucene_4x
I wanted to upgrade my custom client to this new version (using solrj).
So I copied
How much memory are you giving the JVM? Have you put a performance
monitor on the running process to see what resources have been
exhausted (i.e. are you I/O bound? CPU bound?)
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Alexandr Bocharov
wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I need advice for configuring Solr
Thank you for help :)
I'm giving 2048M the JVM for each node.
CPU load is jumping 70-90%.
Memory usage is increasing to max during testing (probably cache is
filling).
I/O I didn't monitor.
I'd like to see answers on my other questions.
2012/6/13 Erick Erickson
> How much memory are you giving
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Rok Rejc wrote:
> - java.runtime.nameOpenJDK Runtime Environment
> - java.runtime.version1.6.0_22-b22
...
>
> As far as I see from the JIRA issue I have the patch attached (as mentioned
> I have a trunk version from May 12). Any ideas?
>
its not guaranteed that
Consider just looking at it with jconsole (should be in your Java release) to
get a sense of the memory usage/collection. How much physical memory
do you have overall?
Because this is not what I'd expect. Your CPU load is actually reasonably high,
so it doesn't look like you're swapping.
By and
Mark Miller schrieb am 12.06.2012 19:19:01:
>
>
> On Jun 12, 2012, at 3:39 AM, lenz...@gfi.ihk.de wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > we tested SolrCloud in a setup with one collection, two shards and one
> > replica per shard and it works quite fine with some example data.
> > Now, we plan to set
Hmm, it seems that if I leave off the initial "facet.sort=index" then
it will sort each by index by default, and I can use the
"f.people.facet.sort=count" as expected.
I thought I tried that yesterday, but I suppose it slipped my mind in
my sleep-deprived state.
Thanks Jack!
-- Chris
On Tue, J
Hi,
am struggling around with creating multiple collections on a 4 instances
SolrCloud
setup:
I have 4 virtual OpenVZ instances, where I have installed SolrCloud on each
and
on one is also a standalone Zookeeper running.
Loading the Solr configuration into ZK works fine.
Then I startup the 4 in
BTW: i am running the solr instances using -Xms512M -Xmx1024M
so not so little memory.
Daniel
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Daniel Brügge <
daniel.brue...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> am struggling around with creating multiple collections on a 4 instances
> SolrCloud
> setup:
>
> I have
I'm glad that you have something working, but you shouldn't have to remove
that facet.sort=index.
I tried the following and it works with the Solr 3.6 example after I indexed
with exampledocs/books.json:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?q=*:*&facet=true&facet.field=name&facet.field=genre_s&
TNX. A lifesaver...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DIH-Multiple-repeat-XPath-stmts-tp499770p3989439.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
What is more, I tried to get the maximum value using stats query
This time the response time was about 30 seconds and server ate 1.5 Gb of
memory when calculating the response. But there were no statistics in
response:
0
27578
*.*
true
Id
0
What's wrong here?
--
View this message in
Thats an interesting data dir location: NativeFSLock@/home/myuser/
data/index/write.lock
Where are the other data dirs located? Are you sharing one drive or
something? It looks like something already has a writer lock - are you sure
another solr instance is not running somehow?
On Wed, Jun 13, 20
What command are you using to create the cores?
I had this sort of problem, and it was because I'd accidentally created
two cores with the same instanceDir within the same SOLR process. Make
sure you don't have that kind of collision. The easiest way is to
specify an explicit instanceDir and dataD
Try the query without the sort to get the number of rows, then do a second
query using a "start" equal to the number of rows. That should get you the
last row/document.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: rafal.gwizd...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:07 PM
To: solr
We've got a tokenizer which is quite explicitly coded on the
assumption that it will only be called from one thread at a time.
After all, what would it mean for two threads to make interleaved
calls to the hasNext() function()?
Yet, a customer of ours with a gigantic instance of Solr 1.4 reports
i
Hmmm, are you sure SolrCloud fits your needs? You say that you think
everything will fit on one shard and are worried about bulk updates. In
that case I should think regular Solr master/slave (rather than cloud)
might be a better fit. Using Cloud and all that goes with it for a single shard
is cert
Hmmm, I think you may be looking at the wrong thing here. Generally, a
filterCache
entry will be maxDocs/8 (plus some overhead), so in your case they really
shouldn't be all that large, on the order of 3M/filter. That shouldn't
vary based
on the number of docs that match the fq, it's just a bitset.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> Does this suggest anything to anyone? Other than that we've
> misanalyzed the logic in the tokenizer and there's a way to make it
> burp on one thread?
it might suggest the different tokenstream instances refer to some
shared object tha
A large start value is probably worse performing than the sort (see SOLR-1726).
Once the sort field is cached, it'll be quick from then on. Put in a warming
query in solrconfig for new and/or firstSearcher that does this sort and the
cache will be built in advance of queries at least.
Thanks for your response
Yes, maybe you are right. I thought that filters can be larger than 3M. All
kinds of filters uses BitSet?
Moreover maxSize of filterCache is set to 16000 in my case. There are
evictions during day traffic
but not during night traffic.
Version of Solr which I use is 3.5
I
Hi,
I have a data config file that contains the data import query. If I just
run the import query against MySQL, I get a certain number of results. I
assume that if I run the full-import, I should get the same number of
documents added to the index, but I see that it's not the case and the
number
Note: I don't see any errors in the logs when I run the index.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Swetha Shenoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a data config file that contains the data import query. If I just
> run the import query against MySQL, I get a certain number of results. I
> assume that if I ru
Could it be that you are getting records that are not unique. If so then
SOLR would just overwrite the non unique documents.
Thanks
Afroz
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Swetha Shenoy wrote:
> Note: I don't see any errors in the logs when I run the index.
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 5:48 PM, S
That makes sense. But I added a new entry that showed up in the MySQL
results and not in the Solr search results. The count of documents also did
not increase after the addition. How can a new entry show up in MySQL
results and not as a new document?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Afroz Ahmad w
Check the ID for that latest record and try to query it in Solr.
One way you can get multiple records in an RDBMS query is via join. In that
case, each of the records could have the same value in the column(s) that
you are using for your unique key field in Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Origi
On 14 June 2012 04:51, Swetha Shenoy wrote:
> That makes sense. But I added a new entry that showed up in the MySQL
> results and not in the Solr search results. The count of documents also did
> not increase after the addition. How can a new entry show up in MySQL
> results and not as a new docum
On 13 June 2012 10:45, Pranav Prakash wrote:
> My DIH Config file goes as follows. We have two db hosts, one of which
> contains blocks of content and the other contain transcripts of those
> content blocks. The makeDynamicTranscript function is used to create row
> names like transcript_en, trans
Will check later to use different data dirs for the core on
each instance.
But because each Solr sits in it's own openvz instance (virtual
server respectively) they should be totally separated. At least
from my point of understanding virtualization.
Will check and get back here...
Thanks.
On Wed
29 matches
Mail list logo
