Hello,
*Background* :For each of our customers, we create 3 solr webapps with
different search schema's,serving different search requirements and we
have about 70 customers.So we have about 210 webapps curently .
*Hardware*: Single Server , one JVM , Heap memory 19GB ,Total Ram :32GB ,
Permgen
Hi,
This is what the thread dump looks like.
Any ideas?
Mav
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM20.1-b02Thread Count: current=19,
peak=20, daemon=6'DestroyJavaVM' Id=26, RUNNABLE on lock=, total cpu
time=198450.ms user time=196890.ms'Timer-2' Id=25, TIMED_WAITING
on lock=java.util.TaskQueu
hi
I checked out the trunk and played with its new soft commit
feature. it's cool. But I've got a few questions about it.
By reading some introductory articles and wiki, and hasted code
reading, my understand of it's implementation is:
For normal commit(hard commit), we should flush all in
Just my opinion, but I'm not sure I see the value in deploying the cores
to different webapps in a single container on a single machine to avoid
a single point of failure... You still have a single point of failure at
the process level down to the hardware, which when you think about it,
is mostly
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 7:02 AM, mav.p...@holidaylettings.co.uk
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is what the thread dump looks like.
>
> Any ideas?
Looks like the thread taking up CPU is in LukeRequestHandler
> 1062730578@qtp-1535043768-5' Id=16, RUNNABLE on lock=, total cpu
> time=16156160.ms user tim
I can call a script for the logic part but what I want to figure out is how to
save the same field sometimes as stored and indexed, sometimes as stored not
indexed, etc. From a transformer or a script I didn't see anything where I can
modify that at indexing time.
Thanks a lot,
Maria
On Apr 27
I have a SolrJ application that uses the core admin as well as doing
queries against each core. I have an object of my own design for each
core that uses SolrJ directly. Two of my core objects (one for build
and one for live) are used in an object that represents a shard, and
multiple shard o
Maria,
For your need please define unique pattern using dynamic field in schema.xml
Please have a look http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SchemaXml#Dynamic_fields
Hope that helps!
-Jeevanandam
Technology keeps you connected!
On Apr 28, 2012, at 10:33 PM, "Vazquez, Maria (STM)"
wrote:
> I can call
Thanks Jeevanandam.
That still doesn't have the same behavior as Lucene since multiple fields with
different names have to be created.
What I want is this exactly (multi-value field)
document.add(new Field("geoids", geoId, Field.Store.YES,
Field.Index.NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS));
document.add(new F
Hi,
What is your "qf" parameter?
Can you run the three queries with debugQuery=true&echoParams=all and attach
parsed query and all params? It will probably explain what is happening.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
This does not address the question. A single-ideogram query will not
find ideograms in the middle of phrases.
I have also found that phrase slop does not work with bigrams. At all.
I created a separate field type with unigrams. The CJK fields use the
StandardAnalyzer. I made a stack with just the
Maria,
thanks for detailed explanation.
as per schema.xml; stored or indexed should be defined at design-time.
Per my understanding defining at runtime is not feasible.
BTW, you can have multiValued="true" attribute for dynamic fields too.
- Jeevanandam
On 29-04-2012 2:06 am, Vazquez, Maria (
12 matches
Mail list logo