RE: Keyword Tokenizer Phrase Issue

I have come to the conclusion that this isn't possible due to the way dismax queries are created. I found someone else that had the exact same issue last year: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Multi-word-exact-keyword-case-insensitive-search-suggestions-td2246516.html I believe this makes it i

Re: indexing with DIH (and with problems)

Dear Shawn, thanks for your reply. but my contrib directory of Solr 3.5 dont' contain this .jar files (apache-solr-dataimporthandler-3.5-SNAPSHOT.jar and apache-solr-dataimporthandler-extras-3.5-SNAPSHOT.jar) I have only apache-solr-dataimporthandler-3.5.jar and apache-solr-dataimporthandler-extra

Re: SolrJ + SolrCloud

Thanks Mark. Is there any plan to make all the Solr search handlers work with SolrCloud, like MLT? That missing feature would prohibit us from using SolrCloud at the moment. :( On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 18:24 -0500, Mark Miller wrote: > On Feb 11, 2012, at 6:02 PM, Darren Govoni wrote: > > > Hi, > >

Re: indexing with DIH (and with problems)

Hi, Now, my DIH run but maybe only partly I indexing a directory containing 43 pdf files. follow, the reply of my FUll-import command: *full-import* *idle* - *0* *43* *0* *2012-02-12

Re: Geospatial search with multivalued field

Marian, My experience is not applicable to you directly, but David says You'll need to run "mvn package" to generate a jar file that you can throw into your classpath. Have you got the jar ? You don't need to bother with Solr sources. Just build jar and put it into Solr libs (see http://wiki.ap

Re: indexing with DIH (and with problems)

sorry for the confusion: I forgotted a part of code: Withouth this part, The result is the same of previous mail. If I add this raw, the results is: - *0:0:1.79* *0* *1* *0* *0* *201

Format version is not supported in file 'segments_gw': 0 (needs to be between -9 and -10). This version of Lucene only supports indexes created with release 3.0 and later.

Im getting the error below all of a sudden. AFAIK i haven't touched anything with Lucene. I did add a fields to my schema and data-config.xml: data-config.xml: schema.xml: But removed those again later. I restarted my machine several times, and also restarted cygwin and reloaded my data-config.

Re: Geospatial search with multivalued field

2012/2/12 Mikhail Khludnev : > Marian, > > My experience is not applicable to you directly, but David says > >  You'll need to run "mvn package" to generate a jar file that you can throw > into your classpath. > > Have you got the jar ? You don't need to bother with Solr sources. Just > build jar a

Re: indexing with DIH (and with problems)

the last version: with this data-config I obtain this result: *full-import* *idle* - *0:0:2.44* *0* *43* *0* *2012-02-12 19:06:00

Re: Improving performance for SOLR geo queries?

Mathias, For what it's worth, someone using LSP (Lucene Spatial Playground)'s RecursivePrefixTreeFieldType (which uses geohash encoding by default) quoted a 2x performance increase over Solr's built-in LatLonType. To boost the performance further, there are a couple parameters you can tweak. One

Re: Geospatial search with multivalued field

Seems like I moved to the next failure. Now I get java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/solr/schema/SpatialQueryable during solr startup. Any idea where this sould be? It seems to be required by the path (src/main/java/solr2155/solr/schema/GeoHashField.java:public class GeoHashField ext

Re: Geospatial search with multivalued field

Hi Marian. I'm the author of Solr2155. SpatialQueryable is an interface provided by Solr. Where did you put the SOLR-2155 built jar file? Perhaps you put it where it doesn't belong like in your servlet engine's lib directory (varies). You can put this in a variety of places like embedding it

Does the stats component cache

Does the stats component cache. If not what are the alternatives for finding Max / Min values of fields for a particular result set. We think we are running into performance issues with the stats component (250ms for a query when we issue a query with the stats component on) Cheers

Re: Improving performance for SOLR geo queries?

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > One way to speed up numeric range queries (at the cost of increased > index size) is to lower the precisionStep.  You could try changing > this from 8 to 4 and then re-indexing to see how that affects your > query speed. Your issue, and the fa

Do we need reindexing from solr 1.4.1 to 3.5.0?

Do we need to reindex solr data which was indexed using solr 1.4.1 in order to upgrade it to solr 3.5.0? Because indexing is really a huge costly process in our case because the data generated needs some calculations which takes lot of time. Else otherwise if there is any other tool which can updat