!!! OFF TOPIC, srry
I cannot stand but I want to write this. Subject is very intriguing beacuse
of two meanings of the war word. :)
Best Regards
Alexander Aristov
On 4 February 2012 01:50, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Darren Govoni wrote:
>
> > I deployed each w
Hello Solr-users,
I am trying to search a patents dataset (in xml format) which
has fields like title, abstract, patent_ number,year of submission . Since
I would not want to specify the field name in a query, I have used a
catchall field, and using copyField, I copied all fields into
>
>
>
>
>
> searchField
>
>
> I have noticed that 'title' field and 'patent_no'
> field are not getting
> copied.
You need to use upper case F letter. copyField versus copyfield.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 1:20 AM, XJ wrote:
> When I look into details (slow queries), I found some real issues that I
> need help with. For example, a query which takes 200ms with geo sharding,
> now timeout (>2000ms) with distributed search. And each shard query
> (isShard=true) takes about 1200ms
also, if you want to search across different fields without specifying
field names, you can use dismax
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> searchField
>>
>>
>> I have noticed that 'title' field and 'pate
Hallo,
I hope somebody can help me.
My Question:
Is it possible to copy the directory /solr/data/index from indexed from
Solrversion 3.2.0 to Solr 3.4.0.
I want to use the new Solr-Version and want to put the Index from the old
one to the new Solr 3.4.0
Please forgive my bad english
Greeds
To
Thanks! I will look into it.
Regards,
Rakesh Varna
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Esteban Donato wrote:
> also, if you want to search across different fields without specifying
> field names, you can use dismax
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMaxQParserPlugin
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:0
Hi
I have seen several questions on this already but haven't been able to sort my
issue. My problem is that multi-word synonyms aren't behaving as I would
expect. I have copied my field type definition at the bottom of this message,
but the relevant synonym filter is here (used at index time):
Hi,
Yes, you may do this as a WAR upgrade. You may easily test this on a test copy
of your index, and it should work just fine. Be aware though that once you have
upgraded, you cannot go back. From Solr3.4.0's CHANGES.TXT:
* The Lucene index format has changed and as a result, once you upgrade,