Hi Mike,
(12/01/11 16:14), Michael Lissner wrote:
- I need help with fragsize. The wiki says to set it to either 0 or a huge
number to disable
fragmenting. Which is it?
It is original Highlighter.
- the wiki says that hl.useFastVectorHighlighter is defaulted to false. I read
somewhere that
Johnny
What you are going to want to do is boost the artist field with respect to the
others, for example using edismax my 'qf' parameter is:
number^5 title^3 default
so hits in the number field get a five-fold boost and hits in the title field
get a three-fold boost. In your case you
> Does
> that make more sense?
Ah I see.
I'm not certain but take a look at pivot faceting
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-792
cheers lee c
Hi,
There are a couple ways of handling this.
One is to do it from the 'client' side - i.e. do a Solr ping to each
shard beforehand to find out which/if any shards are unavailable. This
may not always work if you use forwarders/proxies etc.
What we do is add the name of all failed shards to the
Hi,
It's quite coincidental that I was just about to ask this very
question to the forum experts.
I think this is the same sort of thing Jamie was asking about. (the
only difference in my question is that the values won't be known at
query time)
Is it possible to create a request that will return
> > What is an equivalent fieldType definition in Solr 3.5?
>
>
>
>
OK, and if I would reindex, is this still the best practice config for
german text?
Hi Mike,
Can you try removing ' from the
nested entities? Just keep it in the top level entity.
Regards,
Rakesh Varna
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Mike O'Leary wrote:
> [...]
> > My data-config.xml file looks like this:
> >
> >
>
Try using flatten="true" in the rather than the . Note that
it will remove all child node names, and will only concatenate the text
values of the child nodes.
example:
abc
def
ghi>/id>
will concatenate abc, def, ghi to give a single text value. Note that xpath
terminates at
Regards,
Rakes
Yes and No.
If using Synonyms funtionality out of the box you have to do it at index time.
But if using it at query time, like we do, you have to do some programming.
We have connected a thesaurus which is actually using synonyms functionality at
query time.
There are some pitfalls to take care