Hello,
I'm new to SOLR. I am facing the same set of problem to solve. The idea is
to search for key phrase(s) within a set of documents. I understand the
query syntax somewhat. What if the list of document ids to search gets to
about say, 1 documents? what is the best way to craft the query?
Aslo i found that XPathEntityProcessor doesn't encode text.
but if i try to import data using XpathEnityProcessor it does not import
data for my Mfld field (non-multivalued).
below what i have tried.
String will be like
I have String like below format
---
this is solr!!WelcomeHello test
I want it to convert it in below format using XPathEntityProcessor
---
12: this is solr!! 18: Welcome 35: Hello test
I had used PlainTextEnityProcessor with ScriptTransfor
Hi Uma,
i don't understand what you're looking for.
Do you need to sort on fields of type double with precision 2 or what?
In your example you were talking about
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14.
Regards,
Bernd
Am 06.01.2012 07:11, schrieb umaswayam:
Hi Bernd,
The column which comes f
If you want the Nth result in a result set, that would be:
start=N&rows=1
A document 'id' is field containing a unique value for a document. It
is not normally used for relevance scoring. You would instead search
for
id:value
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:55 PM, solr_noob wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm new
Hi,
from your snippets the reason is not completely clear. There are a number of
reasons for not starting up the
server. For example in case of a faulty configuration of the core
(solrconfig.xml, schema.xml) the core does
not start and you get the reported error.
Best,
Sven
Am 06.01.2012 um
I think you would get much farther along if
you thought about a SolrJ program that
read in the documents, parsed them
and then constructed the Solr document to
send to Solr. This is much more
flexible than trying to force complex
manipulations through XPathEntityProcessor,
which does not support th
Also note that an EmbeddedSolrServer is for a specific core, not for all cores
(and thus solr.xml is not used). My hunch is that you need to point to the
core's home directory, not to the parent of solr.xml.
Erik
On Jan 6, 2012, at 03:06 , Sven Maurmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from your s
Hello,
It seem you are talking about huge disjunctive filter: fq=id:(1 2 3 4
5). I have two suggestions.
I. don't do that. It has the following drawbacks:
* it takes too much to parse such long query. as result, search will
cost O(query-len) instead of O(numFound) (without scoring/sorting)
*
Hello Raj,
AFAIK dataimport.properties absence is just a warning, but not
show-stopper (import process write it itself).
I can suggest you to play around dataimport.jsp it has interactive
debug support, which is pretty useful at most times.
Also, consider to set org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport
To answer myself after looking at the code:
public static final String NUMBER_BACKUPS_TO_KEEP = "numberToKeep";
So
7
should do it :-).
regards
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hello all,
i want to get whole xmldata into one field, for that i am using
xpathentityprocessor with flattern=true
but still it doesn't work as expected.
e.g. sample xml isabcabc
bcd
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Sven Maurmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from your snippets the reason is not completely clear. There are a number of
> reasons for not starting up the
> server. For example in case of a faulty configuration of the core
> (solrconfig.xml, schema.xml) the core does
> not sta
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> Also note that an EmbeddedSolrServer is for a specific core, not for all
> cores (and thus solr.xml is not used). My hunch is that you > need to point
> to the core's home directory, not to the parent of solr.xml.
Oh, interesting. The exam
See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?focusedCommentId=13114839&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13114839
with my response following Geert-Jan's question.
~ David
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-serv
On 1/6/2012 9:57 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Sven Maurmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> from your snippets the reason is not completely clear. There are a number of
>> reasons for not starting up the
>> server. For example in case of a faulty configuration of the core
>> (
2012/1/6 Yury Kats :
>
> Have you tried passing core name (collection1) to the c'tor, instead
> of the empty string?
Yep, but that gives the same error (with the core name appended) such
as "no such core: collection1"
Phil
Hi Juan,
You're correct, the search results casing is working fine. This is my
mistake, I didn't specify that I'm using the Suggester component in order
to drive an auto-completion field on a website. Is there anyway to change
the output of the Suggester to maintain case? Everything is coming out
On 1/6/2012 10:19 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> 2012/1/6 Yury Kats :
>>
>> Have you tried passing core name (collection1) to the c'tor, instead
>> of the empty string?
>
> Yep, but that gives the same error (with the core name appended) such
> as "no such core: collection1"
That probably means the
People usually just have the slaves know about each other via the
configuration files (here's a good reference as well as a gotcha,
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-have-quot-shards-quot-parameter-by-default-td884519.html).
The idea is that you configure a search handler to automatically
On Jan 6, 2012, at 10:46 , Yury Kats wrote:
> On 1/6/2012 10:19 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote:
>> 2012/1/6 Yury Kats :
>>>
>>> Have you tried passing core name (collection1) to the c'tor, instead
>>> of the empty string?
>>
>> Yep, but that gives the same error (with the core name appended) such
>>
2012/1/6 Yury Kats :
>
> That probably means the home is not set properly, so it can't find solr.xml
>
Well, all the docs mention doing is this bit, which I have:
System.setProperty('solr.solr.home',
'/usr/servers/solr/apache-solr-3.5.0/example/heceta');
I've also tried it the other way mentioned
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> Again, EmbeddedSolrServer (unless I'm gravely mistaken!) doesn't do
> multicore. It's for a single core. If you want multiple cores
> supported... created multiple EmbeddedSolrServer instances. You point the
> instance to the core's "h
Multicore does work with EmbeddedSolrServer. It's what we use in our
application.
solr.xml is also relevant for configuring the cores. We do not do it in quite
the same manner that Phillip is describing, though. Our CoreContainer is
initialized by SolrDispatchFilter. After the core container is
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Christopher Childs wrote:
> Multicore does work with EmbeddedSolrServer. It's what we use in our
> application.
>
> solr.xml is also relevant for configuring the cores. We do not do it in quite
> the same manner that Phillip is describing, though. Our CoreContain
On 1/5/2012 7:25 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Somewhere you have access to a CommonsHttpSolrServer, right? There's a
getHttpClient call that returns an org.apache.commons.httpclient that
might get you the information you need.
If I have a multithreaded app that shares a single HttpClient between
I'm trying to set up some basic synonyms. The one I've been working on is:
us, usa, united states
My understanding is that adding that to the synonym file will allow
users to search for US, and get back documents containing usa or united
states. Ditto for if a user puts in usa or united states
See SOLR-141; there are a few patches - currently all you get back is a
400 error with no actual information equivalent to what is logged in the
solr exception.
On 1/6/2012 12:46 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 1/5/2012 7:25 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Somewhere you have access to a CommonsHttpSolrS
Hi guys,
I have bunch of simple documents, only differentiated by "rating filed":
Robert
eab213a7-b5f7-a8cf-71f3-2b7929eb1965
Dagge
0
7
rdagge
IT Sourcing Strategy
131
Larry
efa1c145-d244-ed07-09d9-6af43f3f35a0
Gutman
0
6
lgutman
I have led major global deployments of technology and process, Gl
I switched over to using FastVectorHighlighting, and the problem with
maxBooleanClause is resolved. I guess this is at the expense of having
a larger index (since you have to enable termVectors, termPositions and
termOffsets), but at least it's working.
Thanks for the help.
Mike
On Tue 03 Ja
Hello Mikhail
I like your idea of creating an index for eg category-id. I am going to try
to approach the problem with that for now. yeah, off the top of my head, the
idea of fq=id(1,2,3,4..) does not seem scalable. thank you so much for
your suggestion and pointing out the performance ramific
What does "/no_coord" mean in the dismax scoring output? I've looked
through the wiki mail archives, lucidfind, and can't find any reference.
--
¡jah!
OK, this is working now. There were a couple of things going on, but
the net-net was "classloading issues."
The initial "no such core" problem was happening because the cores
weren't initializing properly due
to a NoClassDefFoundError. But after fixing that, I wound up with a
pile of ClassCastEx
33 matches
Mail list logo
