After playing some more with this I managed to get what I want, almost.
My query now looks like:
q={!frange l=0 incl=false}query({!type=edismax qf="abstract^0.02 title^0.08
categorysearch^0.05" boost='eqsim(alltokens,"xyz")' v='+tokens5:"xyz" '})
With the above query, I am getting only the resu
http://www.lucidimagination.com/content/scaling-lucene-and-solr
Has good guidance.
Wrt 1. What is the issue - mem, cpu or query perf or indexing process
On Nov 20, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Lalit Kumar 4 wrote:
> Hello:
> We recently have seen performance issues of SOLR (running on jetty).
>
> W
The search with couple of parameters bringing 650 counts(out of 2500 approx)
and taking around 30 seconds
The schema.xml have more than 100 fields.
-Original Message-
From: "Govind @ Gmail"
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:01:04
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Reply-To: "solr-user@lucene.ap
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Lalit Kumar 4 wrote:
>
> The search with couple of parameters bringing 650 counts(out of 2500 approx)
> and taking around 30 seconds
> The schema.xml have more than 100 fields.
You have of course started with the basics like making sure that the
index is less th
I am a beginner to solr and need to ask the following:
Using the apache-solr example, how can I display an url in the xml document
as an active link/url in http? Do i need to add some special transform in
the example.xslt file?
thanks
Ben
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www
Ben,
Not quite sure how to interpret what you're asking here. Are you speaking of
the /browse view? If so, you can tweak the templates under conf/velocity to
make links out of things.
But generally, it's the end application that would take the results from Solr
and render links as appropria
Erik,
OK, I will look at that. Basically, what I amtrying to do is to index a
document with lots of URLs. I also index the url and give it a field type.
Don't know much about solr yet, but though maybe I can transform the url to
an active link, i.e. ''. I tried putting the href into the xml
documen
Could we see the schema definitions for the fields in question? And
the solrconfig for the handler, and the query you actually send?
Best
Erick
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Jean-Claude Dauphin
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The parsedQuery is displayed as follow:
>
> parsedquery=+(DisjunctionMaxQuery((
As it happens I'm working on SOLR-2438 which should address this. This patch
will provide two things:
The ability to define a new analysis chain in your schema.xml, currently called
"multiterm" that will be applied to queries of various sorts,
including wildcard,
prefix, range. This will be somewh
Each fq will create a bitmap that is bounded by (maxdocs / 8) bytes.
You can think of the entries in the fiterCache as a map where the key is the
filter query you specify and the value is the aforementioned bitmap. The
number of entries specified in the config file is the number of entries
in that
Well, I wouldn't store it as a string in the first place. Otherwise,
you're right,
you have to store it as an entity that compares lexicographically, usually by
left-padding with zeroes.
But don't do that if at all possible, it's much more expensive than
storing ints or
longs, so can you re-index
Please review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Best
Erick
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Tor Henning Ueland
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Lalit Kumar 4 wrote:
>>
>> The search with couple of parameters bringing 650 counts(out of 2500 approx)
>> and taking around 3
I think you're confusing Solr with a web app
Solr itself has nothing to do whatsoever with presenting
things to the user. It just returns, as you have seen,
XML (or JSON or ) formatted replies. It's up to the
application layer to do something intelligent with those.
That said, the /brows
Hi,
As per our business logic we have to show two products per company in our
results. Second product should also be displayed as a normal search result,
instead of "more..." (or "+", "expand") kind of nested results.
*Short description*: With *group.limit=2 *option I am not able to find the
exac
Thanks Erick.
Do you think the patch you are working on will be applicable as well to 3.4?
Best,
Dmitry
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> As it happens I'm working on SOLR-2438 which should address this. This
> patch
> will provide two things:
>
> The ability to define a
I am using solr 3.4 and configured my DataImportHandler to get some data from
MySql as well as index some rich document from the disk.
This is the part of db-data-config file where i am indexing Rich text
documents.
http://localhost/resumes-new/resumes${re
Number of rows in SQL Table (Indexed till now using Solr): 1 million
Total Size of Data in the table: 4GB
Total Index Size: 3.5 GB
Total Number of Rows that I have to index: 20 Million (approximately 100 GB
Data) and growing
What is the best practices with respect to distributing the index? Wha
17 matches
Mail list logo
